OKX adds token support for atomicals, runes, doginals and stamps

The Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) of Taiwan has disclosed its intention to introduce a fresh draft of digital asset regulations for the nation come September 2024. The forthcoming draft bill seeks to establish more robust regulations for digital asset markets, prioritizing investor safety, as announced by Huang Tien-mu, the chairman of FSC. That’s according to a March 4 report by local media outlet, United Daily News (UDN).Photo by Kelly Sikkema on UnsplashAddressing customer protectionIn October, Taiwanese legislators introduced the Virtual Asset Management Bill to parliament, a move aimed at fortifying customer protection and ensuring effective industry supervision. The bill encompasses provisions that could impose fines ranging from two million Taiwanese dollars ($63,000) to 20 million Taiwanese dollars on unlicensed virtual asset service providers (VASPs). Around that time, the authorities had a particular concern with regard to the operation of foreign and offshore VASPs within the Taiwanese market. Like Hong Kong, Taiwan also had seen some negative impact due to the fraudulent activity of the Dubai-based JPEX crypto platform.The FSC has already barred foreign VASPs from operating in Taiwan without requisite approvals from the regulator. These measures were instituted following the establishment of a self-regulatory association by major cryptocurrency exchanges in the country, aiming to foster collaboration with regulators. Stricter regulationsPer the latest report, Chairman Huang Tien-mu outlined the FSC's plan to propose a draft bill targeting virtual currencies in September of the current year. This initiative seeks to bolster investor safeguarding and enhance regulatory oversight over the virtual currency sector. Concern has also been raised relative to native exchanges, in addition to offshore VASPs. In November, an investigation was opened into the Bitgin exchange, amid alleged money laundering activity. Shortly afterwards, another probe was launched into the ACE Exchange, amid allegations of money laundering and fraud. Highlighting the imperative for stricter regulations, Huang underscored the potential fraud risks tied to digital currencies. He issued a stern warning, signaling severe administrative penalties for merchants engaged in fraudulent activities aimed at investors. Moreover, the regulator expressed concerns about the growing interconnection between digital assets and the conventional financial system. He emphasized the need for laws to shield the stability of traditional financial systems from the inherent risks posed by digital assets. Addressing apprehensions regarding the misuse of virtual currencies for fraudulent endeavors, Huang cautioned of stringent administrative penalties awaiting both domestic and foreign currency traders found guilty. ETF considerationsTaiwan's Chamber of Commerce is poised to unveil a study on Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in April. Gao Jingping, Deputy Director of the Securities and Futures Bureau at the Financial Supervisory Commission, indicated Taiwan's contemplation of endorsing spot Bitcoin ETFs under regulatory oversight. However, he advised against investing in foreign crypto-based exchange-traded products. Reports from local media in December suggested that the FSC will closely monitor Bitcoin ETFs to assess their potential and gauge public demand. The FSC intends to release research findings in April, which will influence the fate of Bitcoin ETFs in Taiwan. Positive findings may pave the way for Taiwanese investors to resume acquiring overseas Bitcoin ETFs. This initiative unfolds amid heightened global demand for Bitcoin ETFs, which recently contributed to Bitcoin's surge to almost $69,000.

South Korea Reveals Guidelines for Public Officials’ Virtual Asset DisclosureSouth Korea’s high-ranking government officials will soon be obliged to divulge specific information regarding their virtual asset holdings, including types and quantities, as part of their wealth declaration process. The Ministry of Personnel Management (MPM) issued a press release yesterday, announcing revisions to the Enforcement Decree of the Public Service Ethics Act. These amendments are slated to come into effect on December 14.Photo by Chris Boland on UnsplashIn addition, officials holding positions of rank one or higher will be required to disclose the methods through which they acquired their virtual assets. They must also furnish documentation of transaction records for a period of one year.These amendments to the decree come in the wake of the revised Public Service Ethics Act, which was passed in May. The primary aim of this act is to make it obligatory for government employees to declare their virtual asset holdings. The changes to the decree can be summarized into five main points.Types and amountsFirst, officials obligated to disclose their wealth must report the types and amounts of virtual assets. The prices of virtual assets traded on Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, and Korbit — all virtual asset service providers (VASPs) designated by the Commissioner of the National Tax Service — are required to be reported using the average daily price observed on the reporting day. As for other assets, their values should align with their most recent market prices. In cases where determining these prices is not feasible, they should be reported at reasonable values that reflect transaction prices.Acquisition methodsSecond, high-level public officials must explain how they acquired virtual assets. Under the existing regulation, officials are obligated to reveal both the date and method of acquisition, along with the source of funds. However, following the adoption of the updated decree, they will also be required to provide analogous information for virtual assets.Year-long transaction historyThird, comprehensive guidelines will be established to outline the process of reporting virtual asset transaction history records. Officials subject to the disclosure requirement must divulge all virtual asset transactions conducted within the past year, even if they do not possess such assets on the day of reporting. They are obligated to furnish documentation prepared by VASPs.Officials and their family membersFourth, officials are required to permit VASPs and other relevant institutions to provide the Government Ethics Committee with information on virtual asset holdings owned by both themselves and their family members. This will be facilitated through the inclusion of virtual assets in the existing information provision agreement, similar to the approach applied to other types of assets such as real estate.Addressing conflict of interestLastly, the revised decree could potentially impose restrictions on certain public officials with regard to possessing virtual assets, especially when their responsibilities encompass tasks like formulating relevant policies, granting approval for virtual assets, and overseeing taxation matters related to them. The outcomes of these restrictions will be reported on an annual basis to the Government Ethics Committee.In a briefing regarding this development, MPM Vice Minister Lee In-ho underscored the significance of the amended decree as the regulatory framework for enforcing the requirement of public officials to declare their virtual assets. He highlighted the Korean government’s commitment to ensuring that public servants adhere to accurate reporting practices concerning virtual assets, thereby preventing unlawful accumulation of wealth.

Korean Prosecutors Say Do Kwon and His Colleagues Knew Terra Was Unviable from the BeginningKorean prosecutors claimed that Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon and the key members behind the Terra-LUNA crash were aware of the project’s unviability from the beginning, according to a file issued by the Seoul Southern District Court.©Terraform LabsTerraform Labs founders misleading Korean investorsTerraform Labs founders Do Kwon and Daniel Shin attracted 280,000 investors in Korea alone, claiming that the Terra stablecoin is a means of transaction, even though the company leaders had been notified by the financial authority that Terra-accepting businesses were impermissible. It is reported that during a search and seizure of the company, Korean prosecutors collected evidence that its employees shared such knowledge on their internal messaging system.Terra’s cross trading on crypto exchangesKnowing their cryptocurrency’s unviability, Terra executives registered its sister token LUNA for listing on major Korean crypto exchanges in May 2019. According to the Korean prosecution, they used a bot to create a trade volume of more than 800 million won in three domestic crypto exchanges by cross trading between 2019 and early last year.Cross trading is illegal in the stock market, as it is considered as an act of price manipulation, but LUNA was traded in crypto exchanges and it hasn’t been determined whether their token is a security or not. Under current Korean law, the court has to accept it as a security to punish those behind the Terra collapse.Shin’s denial of allegationsMeanwhile, Daniel Shin denied the prosecution’s allegations and argued that they had never received such a notice from the financial regulator.