World’s oldest exchange gains in-principle approval in Singapore

Crypto Influencer Arrested in Hong Kong Over JPEX AssociationHong Kong police have taken prominent social media influencer and former lawyer Joseph Lam into custody. Known as “Jolamchok” on Instagram, Lam has been arrested due to his connection with the troubled cryptocurrency exchange, JPEX.According to a report from the South China Morning Post (SCMP) on Monday, law enforcement officials conducted a search of his office, where they seized various items of potential evidence, including a plastic bag containing banknotes.Photo by niu niu on UnsplashCelebrity promotionThe Hong Kong regulator, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), recently issued a warning squarely pointing fingers at JPEX for actively enlisting online celebrities like Joseph Lam and over-the-counter (OTC) money changers to promote the platform’s services and products to the Hong Kong public. Hong Kong police are understood to have searched the offices of local OTC exchange service Coingaroo. That action is suspected to be related to the issues that have befallen JPEX.An unverified report suggests that Lam, who is also known as Lin Zuo, may have presented questionable investment “schemes” to a cryptocurrency investment chat group. One of the reported victims was allegedly persuaded to invest 100,000 Hong Kong dollars (approximately $12,800) in cryptocurrencies.In one instance, Lam made claims within the group, stating that people were relentlessly pursuing him for payments and that the amount of money involved was five times higher than usual.“Whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger”On September 17, the day before his arrest, Lam shared a news article on his Instagram account, suggesting that he had not been negatively affected by the JPEX investigations. The caption read, “Whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger.”Following this development, Lam visited the police alongside his legal representatives to provide the necessary information regarding his involvement with JPEX. In a related development, another crypto influencer, Chen Yi, is understood to have been arrested. Yi is suspected of conspiracy to commit fraud.Liquidity crisisJPEX has publicly attributed its liquidity crisis to regulatory pressures and “third-party market makers.” In response, the exchange increased withdrawal fees and suspended certain operations. They have, however, promised to restore liquidity from third-party market makers promptly and gradually return withdrawal fees to normal levels, with details to follow after negotiations.JPEX maintains that it was being treated unfairly. The exchange also said that it would freeze new trades while existing trades would continue to be active until completion.This arrest and the ongoing issues surrounding JPEX come amid wider concerns in the cryptocurrency sector. A recent report from Bitfinex indicated that capital outflows from the crypto markets amounted to a staggering $55 billion in August alone. This substantial outflow has not only impacted Bitcoin but has also affected the liquidity of Ether and stablecoins, underlining the broader challenges faced by the crypto sector.As the investigation into Joseph Lam’s involvement with JPEX continues, it remains to be seen how this development will impact the ongoing troubles facing the cryptocurrency exchange and the broader crypto ecosystem in Hong Kong and beyond.

Hong Kong's debut of Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) faced a tough start on their first day of trading, with volumes falling far below the record-breaking figures seen in the United States earlier in January 2024. Tough act to followThe launch of six spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs, managed by prominent firms including China Asset Management, Harvest Global, Bosera and HashKey, marked a significant milestone for Hong Kong's cryptocurrency market. However, initial trading volumes indicated a notable contrast with the groundbreaking volumes witnessed during the debut of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States. On their inaugural day, the total trading volume of the six new crypto ETFs in Hong Kong amounted to 87.58 million Hong Kong dollars ($12 million). This figure, while significant, paled in comparison to the $4.6 billion trading volume recorded for U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs on their first day, making the U.S. investment funds a tough act to follow. Despite the disparity, industry experts like Justin d'Anethan, head of APAC business development at crypto market maker Keyrock, viewed the Hong Kong ETFs' performance positively within the local market context.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashAbsence of stakingD'Anethan told The Block that while the trading volume in Hong Kong didn't match the U.S. debut, it reflected a noteworthy level of investor interest, particularly considering the market dynamics in Hong Kong, which lacks access to mainland China investors. Bloomberg ETF Analyst Eric Balchunas suggested on X that people expected too much and that in reality, it was a good first day’s trading. In an interview with Bloomberg, China Asset Management CEO Yimei Li stated that the products open the door “for a lot of RMB holders.” They didn’t show up on day one as d’Anethan pointed out, and he further noted that the absence of staking rewards for Hong Kong's spot Ether ETFs was a notable factor affecting investor decisions. Data from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) cited by Cointelegraph illustrated the relatively subdued performance of the newly launched ETFs. Among them, the Bosera HashKey Bitcoin ETF and Ether ETF recorded modest trading volumes, while the China Asset Management (CAM) Bitcoin ETF demonstrated stronger traction, attracting significant trading volume by the closing bell. Prior to trading, CAM's subscription size for its spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs drew substantial interest, totaling $140 million during the initial offering period. This heightened anticipation was further fueled by the success of HKEX's cryptocurrency futures ETFs, which garnered $529 million in net inflows in the first quarter of 2024. Fee exemptionsIn an effort to stimulate investor participation, local fund managers and brokerages in Hong Kong offered fee exemptions for the new crypto ETFs. Harvest waived its management fee for six months, while Bosera extended a fee waiver period of four months. Despite the optimism surrounding the launch, potential access to the ETFs by mainland Chinese investors remains uncertain, subject to Know Your Customer (KYC) policies. Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) stance on Ether ETFs in the U.S. complicates the prospects of listing such products in the near future. While Hong Kong's debut of Bitcoin and Ether ETFs faced challenges in matching the fervor witnessed in the U.S., it nevertheless represents a significant step forward for the region's cryptocurrency market, signaling growing interest and participation in digital asset investments.

Kbank’s Upbit Customer Deposits Total $2.2BKbank, an internet-only bank in South Korea, is facing criticism due to its relatively high proportion of cryptocurrency customer deposits compared to other banks. Kbank reportedly manages approximately KRW 3 trillion (equivalent to $2.2 billion) in deposits from customers of cryptocurrency exchange Upbit, which accounts for about 18% of its total customer deposits.This percentage stands out, being notably higher than other banks that provide accounts to the other four crypto-to-fiat exchanges in Korea. That is according to a report by Maeil Business Newspaper, which obtained documents submitted to lawmaker Kim Hee-gon by the Financial Services Commission (FSC).According to Korean law, crypto exchanges must secure real-name bank accounts from banks to offer crypto trading services against the Korean won. Kbank offers its accounts to Upbit, the dominant player in the Korean crypto market.Photo by David McBee on PexelsNotable exposure to crypto exchangeThe FSC documents showed that Kbank’s Upbit customer deposits totaled KRW 3.09 trillion, making up 18% of its total deposits, which amount to KRW 17.2 trillion.In a striking contrast, Nonghyup Bank had 0.2% of its deposits, equivalent to KRW 557.8 billion, in Bithumb, which is the nation’s second-largest cryptocurrency exchange. Kakaobank, another internet-only bank, had 0.3% (KRW 112.2 billion) of its deposits in Coinone. Shinhan Bank held 0.01% (KRW 43 billion) in Korbit, and Jeonbuk Bank had a similarly small 0.02% (KRW 4.2 billion) in Gopax.Lawmaker Kim pointed out that Kbank has become a bank dedicated to crypto trading. Kim proposed that financial authorities take proactive measures to assess the potential risks that may emerge when Kbank utilizes Upbit customer deposits as a basis for offering credit loans. Such risky financial practices could potentially result in higher loan defaults and the emergence of a greater number of individuals with poor credit histories, which could ultimately jeopardize the stability of the financial market.Regulatory gapThe current Financial Transaction Reporting Act mandates that virtual asset service providers (VASPs) segregate customer deposits from their own assets as a measure to combat money laundering. However, it has been noted that there are regulatory gaps stemming from the absence of specific guidelines for the custody of these deposits.According to the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), Nonghyup and Kakaobank store deposits in separate accounts within the bank. On the other hand, Kbank and Jeonbuk Bank keep deposits in corporate accounts under their respective exchange partners’ names.When deposits are stored in separate accounts within the bank, only the bank has access to those funds, and they are essentially operated in a manner similar to a trust, preventing the bank from using the funds arbitrarily. In contrast, funds held in corporate accounts can be used by the bank as a source for lending. Lawmaker Kim warned that in scenarios such as exchange bankruptcies or similar situations, banks holding customer funds in corporate accounts could face difficulties in ensuring customer protection.Each of these banks receives reserve funds from crypto exchanges in anticipation of potential compensation requirements in the event of unforeseen losses. The FSS states that as of the end of last month, the reserve amounts held by each bank were as follows: Kbank had KRW 200 billion, Nonghyup Bank had KRW 100 billion, Kakao Bank had KRW 73 billion, and both Shinhan Bank and Jeonbuk Bank had KRW 30 billion.Kbank’s Upbit customer deposits are approximately 72 times larger than Shinhan Bank’s Korbit customer deposits. However, the reserve amounts held by Kbank are only 6.7 times greater than those held by Shinhan. Lawmaker Kim emphasized the importance of banks maintaining reserve funds that are proportional to the customer deposits held in their partner crypto exchanges.Signs of recoveryMeanwhile, the Korean cryptocurrency industry, which faced a downturn in the latter half of last year due to events like the Terra collapse and FTX’s bankruptcy, has exhibited signs of recovery in the first half of this year.The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the FSC recently reported that the cryptocurrency market cap in South Korea has reached KRW 28.4 trillion as of the end of June this year. This reflects a 46% increase compared to the end of last year when it stood at KRW 19.4 trillion. Additionally, the total operating profit of domestic exchanges surged by 82% to KRW 227.3 billion over the past six months, compared to the previous figure of KRW 124.9 billion.The total market’s max drawdown (MDD) was 62%. MDD assesses the extent to which an asset has declined in value from its highest point to its lowest point within a specific time frame, before experiencing a recovery. The FIU considers this MDD to be high, urging investor caution.