Animoca Brands ventures into Bitcoin ecosystem

Dunamu reports Q3 slump amid interest rate hikes and economic slowdownDunamu, the operator of South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange Upbit, posted a lackluster performance in this year’s Q3 due to a decrease in trading volume caused by ongoing interest rate hikes and an economic downturn.Photo by Алекс Арцибашев on UnsplashLagging performanceAccording to the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), Dunamu’s consolidated operating revenue in Q3 was KRW 193 billion (approximately $150 million), marking a 29% decrease from the same period a year earlier (KRW 271.9 billion). Operating income came in at KRW 101.8 billion, and net profit was KRW 29.5 billion, down 39.6% and 81.6% from the same period last year, respectively.This underwhelming financial performance reflects the sluggish crypto market amid the nation’s economic downturn and the U.S. Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes. The decrease in the exchange’s net profit in particular can be attributed to a loss in the valuation of crypto assets due to crypto price declines compared to the previous quarter.Positive outlookHowever, with the expected approval of the spot bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) next year and the next Bitcoin halving, the market outlook is expected to improve gradually. Despite the current market conditions, Dunamu plans to continuously promote the mainstream adoption of blockchain services and explore new business ventures.“We will make efforts to revitalize the blockchain ecosystem and create an advanced investment environment,” Dunamu said. “We will strive to offer innovative services building on our unique technological capabilities.”

Japan’s financial authority has decided to regulate cryptocurrencies under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, classifying them as financial instruments. According to a report by The Asahi Shimbun, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) intends to include this reclassification in an amendment scheduled for submission during next year’s regular Diet session. Under the revised framework, local crypto exchanges will be required to provide detailed disclosures on the 105 tokens they handle. This includes the existence of issuers, underlying technologies such as blockchain, and price volatility risks. The proposed regulations will also subject these classified cryptocurrencies to insider trading rules. Issuers and individuals affiliated with exchanges will be prohibited from trading based on material non-public information, such as the suspension of trading or an issuer’s potential bankruptcy.Photo by Karola G on PexelsToken coverage in JapanAlthough the regulatory list contains 105 tokens, data from the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA), cited in a New Economy report, indicates that Japanese exchanges currently list 119 cryptocurrencies, leaving unclear how the remaining digital assets will be regulated.  To enhance investor protection, the FSA will mandate specific disclosure requirements for issuers that use token launches for fundraising. These entities will be required to report on their latest business activities and future issuance plans annually. This legislative push follows a discussion paper published by the FSA in April, which proposed dividing crypto assets into two distinct categories. The first category includes tokens issued for raising capital, while the second comprises established cryptocurrencies that are not primarily used for issuer fundraising, citing Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) as primary examples. Tax cut from 55% to 20%In parallel with these regulatory changes, the FSA plans to request tax reforms similar to those applied to traditional stock trading. Under Japan’s current tax code, taxes on cryptocurrency gains can reach as high as 55%. The agency proposes reducing this rate to a flat 20% in next year’s tax reform. Responding to the news on X, Changpeng Zhao, the founder and former CEO of Binance, welcomed Japan’s initiative to lower crypto taxes. However, he noted that the proposed 20% rate remains high compared to other jurisdictions, many of which do not levy capital gains taxes on crypto at all. Crypto ETF CFDs set to closeThe government’s move to tighten regulations is already reshaping the financial product landscape. One immediate impact is visible in contracts for difference (CFDs) linked to crypto ETFs. As reported by FinanceFeeds, IG Securities, the Japanese subsidiary of the London-listed IG Group, announced changes to its offerings. The firm will stop accepting new orders for CFDs tied to BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust and its Ethereum equivalent on Dec. 1. Open positions are scheduled to be automatically closed on Jan. 31 of next year. If clients do not settle their holdings prior to this date, the final settlement will be calculated based on the official closing price of that final day. This discontinuation adheres to an FSA decision that derivatives referencing Bitcoin or Ether ETFs must be regulated as crypto-related derivatives rather than standard ETF products. These instruments, now under the crypto-related derivative classification, fall under stricter rules regarding investor protection, operational oversight, and licensing. Japan’s latest regulatory and tax initiatives reflect a broader effort to bring clarity and investor protection to the country’s growing crypto market. As the framework evolves, the industry will be watching how the new rules influence participation and market structure. With lower taxes and stricter oversight on the horizon, both investors and exchanges may need to adjust, potentially reshaping liquidity and Japan’s overall appeal while prompting trading platforms to rethink their product offerings. 

Calls for Regulation of Crypto Investment Management Firms Amidst Growing ConcernsThere have been recent calls in South Korea for crypto investment management companies to be subject to the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act amidst concerns about potential regulatory blind spots negatively impacting crypto investors.Photo by Conny Schneider on UnsplashPushing for regulatory oversightKang Seong-hoo, chairman of the Korea Digital Asset Business Association (KDA) went into detail regarding the issue during a forum held by the association on Thursday to discuss the efficient use of technology and safety management in the era of the digital economy.He emphasized that dealings related to virtual asset management such as deposits, lending, and staking must be regulated by authorities under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act. This is due to the fact that crypto investment management companies are not within the purview of the Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information or the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, the latter of which is set to take effect next year.The Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information defines financial companies as those that provide services for selling, buying, exchanging, transferring, keeping, or managing virtual assets; or act as a broker, intermediary, or agent for these services. However, there is no mention of crypto management companies.Echoes of past crypto platform controversiesThese concerns are driven by the looming possibility of another debacle like the class-action lawsuits against crypto platforms like Haru Invest or Delio arising again as a result of regulatory gray areas. Two months ago, investors had filed a legal complaint after the two lenders unexpectedly suspended customer deposits and withdrawals, claiming that they suffered around KRW 50 billion (approximately $39 million at the time of the incident) in damages as a result.Furthermore, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), a division under the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC), recently stated in a report that virtual asset deposits, lending, and DeFi services do not fall under the obligations of the Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information.“Given the context of the ongoing crypto winter since last year, the business model of virtual asset management companies, which is heavily reliant on arbitrage between exchanges, poses a high risk of incidents similar to the Haru Invest and Delio cases,” said Chairman Kang.“In order to ensure virtual asset user protection and market safety, authorities should promptly explore regulatory measures under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act for virtual asset management such as deposits, lending, staking, and the like.”