Former Binance CEO advising Kyrgyzstan on blockchain & crypto

Crypto.com Scores MPI License in SingaporeIn a significant move for the Web3 industry, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has granted online crypto trading platform, Crypto.com, a Major Payment Institution (MPI) license. This regulatory development showcases Singapore’s commitment to welcoming innovation and embracing the potential of the Web3 sector.Photo by Timo Volz on PexelsLicensing milestoneCrypto.com made the exciting announcement on Thursday, revealing that it has received the MPI license from the MAS, the country’s central bank and financial regulator. With this license in hand, Crypto.com can now provide its Digital Payment Token (DPT) services to residents of Singapore.This achievement follows the in-principle approvals granted to Crypto.com by the MAS in June of the previous year, further highlighting the company’s adherence to regulatory standards and its dedication to operating within the guidelines set by financial authorities.Community reactionThe news of the license has garnered positive reactions within the crypto community. Many members see the Singaporean government’s decision as a significant endorsement of the Web3 industry. ‘Aravind,’ a Twitter user, expressed this sentiment, stating, “Singapore government giving out a license is itself a massive plus for the Web3 Industry,” adding that it's probable the process to obtain the license has been hard fought, and likely two years in the making.Interestingly, another community member drew comparisons between Crypto.com’s successes and the challenges faced by global crypto exchange, Binance. While Binance has encountered difficulties in various jurisdictions, Crypto.com has been praised for its steady progress and forward-looking approach.Yet another Twitter user chimed in along similar lines, stating: “Whilst Binance seems to be losing ground, Crypto.com seems to be slowly doing things right and building for the future.”Binance has recently faced setbacks, such as its diminishing presence in the Australian and Canadian markets and trading restrictions imposed in certain European countries. Reports have even surfaced suggesting that Binance plans to lay off 20% of its staff in June.However, it’s important to note that Binance has not given up, as evidenced by its recent expansion into Thailand, where it established a regulatory-compliant platform. The exchange has also taken steps to ensure compliance in Japan through the creation of another regulatory-compliant platform.Additional licensesCrypto.com has set up its headquarters in Singapore, and it is in good company there with leading crypto firms Kraken and Coinbase also maintaining offices in the city state. The company has taken a truly global strategy, having marketed heavily in recent years. It maintains offices in nine other locations, including Miami, Dublin, London, Seoul, Malta, Sofia, Hong Kong and Shenzhen, as well as Kadıköy in Turkey.The crypto trading platform has received a Minimal Viable Product (MVP) preparatory license from the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) in Dubai, alongside firms like Komainu, Hex Trust, and GC Exchange. The company has also successfully pursued digital asset licensing in France, Australia, and the United Kingdom.Crypto.com’s acquisition of the MPI license in Singapore marks a significant milestone for the company and the broader Web3 industry. With Singapore embracing innovation and offering a favorable regulatory environment, Crypto.com is well-positioned to continue its growth and contribute to the advancement of the digital payment token ecosystem.

Sun Flags Unjust Token Profits of Huobi Founder’s BrotherJustin Sun, Founder of the Tron blockchain and stakeholder in Seychelles-based global crypto exchange Huobi, has stated that the younger brother of the founder of the exchange, Li Wei, has received millions of Huobi tokens ($HT) when he shouldn’t have.Taking to Twitter, Sun wrote:“Li Lin’s younger brother Li Wei has repeatedly acquired a large amount of zero-cost HT through abnormal means. He has sold it on the Huobi platform many times in history, and has withdrawn huge amounts of cash”.Negotiating a refund and token burnSun went on to outline the action that he is in favor of taking in unison with decisions taken by the Huobi Global Advisory Committee (HGAC). “In order to protect people’s interests, the [HGAC] and the HT DAO community decided to recover and destroy the HT obtained by Li Wei at zero cost,” he wrote. “The HT destruction will be announced in the HT community. Such behavior will not be condoned,” he added.Sun complained that not only were the tokens wrongly allocated to Li Wei, he had been dumping the tokens on the market, selling them off for fiat money. In addition to the tokens being burnt, Sun says that he alongside the HGAC will “negotiate a refund” by engaging directly with Li Wei relative to the fiat money that he has already extracted through selling off the token.The Tron founder added that he doesn’t think it equitable that Wei should benefit from the token allocation as he hasn’t made any contribution to the Huobi community, stating that “fairness and the importance of rewarding those who genuinely contribute to the growth and development of HT DAO” are important.Double standardsSome in the crypto community would call double standards on Sun’s claims of a lack of fairness. At the time of the collapse of the FTX exchange in November of last year, Sun offered to help, collaborating with FTX’s Sam Bankman Fried to allow assets related to Sun’s crypto projects (TRX, BTT, JST, SUN, and HT) held by FTX customers on the exchange to be traded out of the exchange into external wallets.Trading in these assets recommenced for a time, with the price within the exchange being exorbitant relative to the regular market price outside of FTX. Many FTX customers ended up buying these tokens at excessive prices, without being able to extract them from the exchange like Sun had promised. To cap it off, those customers then had the newly installed FTX Debtor under the guidance of John J. Ray III, record their loss at the time the exchange officially went bankrupt at the normal market price for these tokens.Although originally a China-based exchange, Huobi moved out of the Chinese market due to adverse regulation, re-establishing itself in the Seychelles. The firm maintains offices in South Korea, the United States, Japan, and Hong Kong, where it has had a listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange since 2018.The $HT token has proven to be very volatile both in intraday trading on Tuesday and over the course of the past seven days. In both instances, it has hit high points in excess of $3.00 and low points of $2.70. At the time of publication, the token was trading at $2.90.Photo by Ant Rozetsky on Unsplash

Chinese financial industry groups have warned that illegal fundraising and fraud are increasingly emerging through stablecoins, airdrops, real-world asset (RWA) tokens, and crypto mining schemes, according to a Dec. 5 notice carried by the state-run Xinhua News Agency.Photo by Othman Alghanmi on UnsplashThe joint warning was issued by seven major bodies: the National Internet Finance Association of China, the China Banking Association, the Securities Association of China, the Asset Management Association of China, the China Futures Association, the China Association for Public Companies, and the Payment & Clearing Association of China. These groups stated that such products are being used to drive speculative trading, pyramid schemes, and other illicit activities that threaten financial stability. They stressed that cryptocurrencies are not legal tender in China and do not share the legal status of fiat currency, further noting that regulators have not approved any RWA tokenization activities. Crypto and RWA offerings prohibitedConsequently, the notice bars member institutions from directly or indirectly providing services related to the issuance or trading of cryptocurrencies or RWA tokens. The associations also urged members to intensify risk warnings and investor education, while encouraging the public to report suspected violations. This industry alert follows the central bank’s recent reiteration of its concerns regarding speculative crypto activity. According to Reuters, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) last month restated its ban on crypto-related business, citing a resurgence in speculation and compliance gaps in stablecoins that complicate risk management. The central bank plans to tighten enforcement against unlawful operations, reinforcing the blanket ban on crypto transactions and mining imposed in September 2021. Old Bitcoin loan feud resurfacesDespite this restrictive framework, disputes tied to legacy crypto dealings continue to surface. Cryptopolitan reported that a long-running controversy has re-emerged surrounding Li Feng, a co-founder of Moore Threads, a Chinese GPU designer widely viewed as a homegrown rival to Nvidia. According to Cryptopolitan, the scrutiny follows the company's Dec. 5 debut on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, where it raised 8 billion yuan ($1.1 billion). Reportedly, Li faces accusations of failing to repay 1,500 Bitcoin allegedly borrowed from OKX founder Xu Mingxing. Citing a Foresight News post referenced by analyst AB Kuai.Dong on X, the report indicates that Li and angel investor Xue Manzi launched a cryptocurrency in 2017, raising 5,000 ETH. According to the outlet, Li has been accused of failing to repay 1,500 Bitcoin that he purportedly borrowed from OKX founder Xu Mingxing. Xu is said to have raised the issue publicly and sought resolution through legal proceedings in both China and the U.S. However, the legal ambiguity surrounding cryptocurrencies at the time was viewed as a major obstacle to settlement. Li, for his part, has characterized Xu’s contribution as a failed investment. The situation took a constructive turn when Xu reposted AB Kuai.Dong’s post, saying observers should look past old disputes. Xu encouraged a focus on constructive industry growth and stated that debt matters should be left to legal channels, offering goodwill toward fellow entrepreneurs. The timing of the renewed dispute alongside recent industry warnings highlights a consistent focus on risk control and legal clarity within China’s digital asset space. Authorities continue to emphasize investor protection and formal reporting channels to curb speculation, while market participants are increasingly turning to legal avenues to resolve legacy issues. These developments point to a sector still wrestling with unresolved disputes and regulatory gaps, underscoring the need for clearer rules for both regulators and entrepreneurs.