Sun Flags Unjust Token Profits of Huobi Founder’s Brother

Disagreement has emerged within the Bitcoin blockchain community, revolving around the BRC-20 token standard. Domo, the pseudonymous developer behind the creation of the token standard, has publicly expressed his opposition to an upcoming upgrade proposed by the Hong Kong headquartered project, UniSat Wallet.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashDue diligence concernsOn Tuesday Domo took to the X social media platform (previously Twitter) to articulate his concerns. He voiced apprehensions about hastily implementing updates in BRC-20, asserting that such a rush could potentially harm the broader BRC-20 user community. Domo's resistance is rooted in his belief that UniSat Wallet's proposed updates lack due diligence and are being introduced precipitously without considering potential repercussions. He wrote:”Recognizing the serious implications and valuations involved, I believe rushing these updates in BRC20 is reckless, disregards their peer indexers, and could potentially harm the broader community of BRC20 users.” ‘Split’ rather than ‘fork’Conversely, UniSat Wallet has declared its intention to “follow the Ordinals Jubilee upgrade, to confirm that BRC-20 is still on Ordinals without splitting into an isolated protocol." Described as a "split" rather than a "fork," UniSat Wallet's approach adapts to the Ordinals Jubilee upgrade, a transformative change in how the Bitcoin blockchain manages tokenized assets. In mapping the way forward its proposing to take, UniSat outlined that it would publish a whitepaper on Jan. 31, describing it as “the most significant present we are able to deliver” for BRC-20, Ordinals and Bitcoin. The crux of the matter lies in the method and pace of implementing these changes. Domo's concerns reflect a broader sentiment within the crypto community, where the rapid pace of advancements often collides with the need for stability and thorough vetting. UniSat Wallet's proposed changes, though innovative, may be viewed as potentially destabilizing by certain community members, especially those deeply entrenched in the current BRC-20 standard. Striking a balanceThis development is pivotal, highlighting the dynamic and occasionally contentious nature of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency standards. Web3 project incubator and investor TrustlessLabs summed up the matter in a social media post on Wednesday, drawing the following conclusions:”This situation encapsulates a critical challenge in blockchain protocol development: finding the right balance between preserving stability and embracing technological advancements.” As technology evolves, divergent opinions on the trajectory of these advancements are inevitable. The ongoing debate between Domo and UniSat Wallet serves as a microcosm of the larger conversations transpiring in the crypto space about how to strike the right balance between progress and stability. The BRC-20 token standard, an experimental fungible token standard on Bitcoin, draws inspiration from Ethereum's ERC-20 standard. It allows the creation of fungible tokens using Bitcoin’s Ordinals protocol, constituting a significant breakthrough in cryptocurrency by enabling novel forms of tokenization on the Bitcoin blockchain. This disagreement not only spotlights a critical debate in the crypto realm but also emphasizes the delicate equilibrium between innovation and stability.  

HashKey Report Outlines Risks of Liquid StakingLiquid staking derivatives (LSD) are not without their potential pitfalls according to a report published by Hong Kong’s HashKey Capital.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashLiquid staking exceeds $22 billionThe report, which was published by the digital asset manager and finance house in July, emphasizes the pressing need for enhanced decentralization to counteract the risks associated with this growing trend of liquid staking.The figures themselves are impressive. This year, the total value locked in the liquid staking derivatives market has surged past the $22 billion mark. Correspondingly, the market capitalization of LSD projects has skyrocketed to $18 billion, indicating a substantial influx of interest and investment.However, the growth that these protocols are witnessing also presents a dual-edged conundrum for the Ethereum ecosystem. HashKey Capital’s report underscores that despite the advantages these protocols might offer their respective communities and token-holders, they could potentially destabilize the Ethereum ecosystem in multifaceted ways.Centralization riskAs evident in HashKey Capital’s overview, several LSD protocols heavily rely on a limited number of node operators, effectively centralizing a significant portion of validator nodes. This centralization trend, as highlighted by the report, is a cause for concern. The concentration of node operators raises red flags, as it contradicts the fundamental tenets of decentralization that underpin blockchain technology.The report articulates the adverse effects of centralization in the realm of liquid staking. It points to the dangers of reduced competition and a heightened risk of censorship.The report raises an important caution: “There is a heightened possibility of censorship with centralized staking players, as they may be subject to incentives or regulatory pressure to censor transactions. This can potentially result in a disruption of the trust within the network.”Security threatsCentralization also ushers in security threats. The dominance of major staking players makes the Ethereum ecosystem more susceptible to 51% attacks. Furthermore, the potential for collusion among centralized stakers looms large, leading to actions that counteract the very essence of decentralization, such as front running and malicious maximal extractable value (MEV) susceptibility.However, amidst these centralization risks, HashKey Capital acknowledges that most protocols are in their nascent stages. Many of them have devised strategies to incorporate distributed validator technology into their protocols, a proactive step towards fostering greater decentralization and resilience.HashKey Exchange awarded retail services licenseIn an unrelated development, HashKey Exchange received approval on Wednesday to upgrade type 1 and type 7 licenses, allowing it to cater to retail investors in Hong Kong. This accomplishment comes a mere two months after the city introduced its Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) licensing framework on June 1.In this evolving landscape, HashKey Capital and OSL were among the pioneer licensed exchanges under the city’s earlier voluntary program. Now, the new regulations stipulate that crypto trading platforms must obtain a license to serve retail investors, further solidifying Hong Kong’s commitment to cultivating a thriving crypto ecosystem.As the HashKey Capital report and recent developments in Hong Kong demonstrate, there’s a lot in play relative to both crypto regulation, protocol design and new product innovation. The challenges posed by centralization in liquid staking underscore the importance of vigilance and corrective action. Meanwhile, Hong Kong’s aspirations to become a crypto stronghold offer a beacon of hope in an ever-evolving regulatory landscape.

GRVT (Gravity), a self-custodial hybrid crypto exchange, has received $5 million in funding from Abu Dhabi-based venture capital firm Further Ventures. That’s according to a report published by The Block on Jan. 21. GRVT seeks to blend the benefits of both centralized exchanges and decentralized exchanges in a hybrid model built using ZKsync’s Validium ZK Chain. The platform offers off-chain order matching paired with on-chain settlement at a rate of 600,000 transactions per second (TPS). Settlements are secure and verifiable on the blockchain, while the user maintains custody of his/her assets, and the order book infrastructure is nevertheless centralized.Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on UnsplashEquity-based funding dealThis latest equity-based funding round ran from October until it was closed out in December. Further Ventures, an entity that specializes in early-stage startup funding, led the round, making this its latest investment into a crypto-sector startup.  Earlier this month, the venture capital firm led a funding round into Paris-based crypto wallet technology firm Dfns. Last year, it collaborated with Singapore-headquartered crypto trading firm QCP Capital, in facilitating its expansion in Abu Dhabi.  Other crypto-related investments include staking services provider Twinstake, crypto custodian Tungsten, blockchain infrastructure platform Fuze and crypto derivatives platform Kemet Trading.  Further Ventures counts ADQ, Abu Dhabi’s sovereign wealth fund, among its investors. In 2022, it established a $200 million fund, which was earmarked for investment into early-stage startups in the fintech, digital assets and supply chain sectors. In the past, Hong Kong-based GRVT has held pre-seed and seed funding rounds that involved GRVT token warrants. On this occasion, the funding deal was structured as equity. GRVT CEO Hong Yea explained that equity was chosen as it was felt that the GRVT token should be held in reserve for the community. Additionally, structuring the funding round around equity means that the holding company has the freedom to pivot or expand into alternative business lines in the future. $14.3 million in funding to dateBack in October 2023, the project raised $7.1 million in funding based on a $39 million valuation. That round was co-led by Matrix Partners alongside Delphi Digital, with further participation by Susquehanna Investment Group, CMS Holdings, ABCDE and Hack VC. Matter Labs, the developer of the ZKsync scaling network that GRVT runs on, was also a participant.  This latest funding round brings GRVT’s total capital raised to $14.3 million. In March of last year, the firm had raised $2.2 million from a private token sale. Expanding spot & options tradingIt’s understood that the new funding will be used to expand the platform’s crypto spot and options trading. Furthermore, the firm has plans to acquire an upgraded full Class F license from the regulator in Bermuda. Currently, the Bermudan authorities have issued the company with a modified Class M crypto business license. In an effort to unlock its offering to a broader global market, the company also has plans to pursue a Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) license within the European Union and a virtual assets service provider (VATP) license from the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) in Dubai.