Circle President visits Seoul for stablecoin talks with exchanges and central bank

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.

Wemade Signs MOU with Hub71 to Expand WEMIX Ecosystem in the UAEWemade, a leading blockchain gaming company based in South Korea, has recently entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Hub71, a global tech hub situated in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).Photo by Mohamad on PexelsGlobal tech hubHub71, established in 2017, serves as a global tech hub that brings together startups, corporates, and investors in the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM), which is also home to Wemade’s branch in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region called WEMIX MENA.Hub71 benefits from the support of several influential partners, including Mubadala, the Abu Dhabi Investment Office (ADIO), and ADGM. Mubadala, a sovereign investor, manages a diverse portfolio of assets in the UAE and overseas. ADIO acts as the pivotal government hub promoting investment in Abu Dhabi. Meanwhile, ADGM functions as an international financial center with a regulatory framework based on UK common law.Web3 initiativeIn February, Hub71 launched a dedicated initiative called Hub71+ Digital Assets, aimed at fostering Web3 startups and blockchain technologies in the UAE. The initiative has attracted over $2 billion in capital commitments. Notable partners include Binance, Algorand, Polygon, Mastercard, and Amazon Web Services.As part of this collaborative endeavor, Wemade will participate as a partner by leveraging its native WEMIX token. While WEMIX and startups within its ecosystem will have expedited access to Hub71’s programs, GameFi and DeFi companies in Hub71 will have the opportunity to join the WEMIX ecosystem.Korea and UAE’s investment cooperationEarlier this year, the UAE and South Korea signed an MOU, outlining a $30 billion investment plan in the East Asian nation. This agreement has facilitated the entry of Korean firms into the UAE while also attracting investment opportunities.Wemade aims to expand its WEMIX ecosystem by establishing partnerships with various blockchain projects, both domestically and internationally. The company views the MOU with Hub71 as a significant stepping stone for its expansion in the MENA region.

India tightens control with 3,000 police officials trained in crypto investigationsAs the crypto sector continues to develop, authorities continue to get to grips with the new crypto innovation, with India’s law enforcement being the latest entity to look to clamp down.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashCrypto forensics and investigation trainingAccording to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) annual report, a comprehensive training initiative was undertaken during the financial year 2022–2023. The initiative, spearheaded by the Narcotics Control Bureau and the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C), equipped over 2,900 officials with essential skills in cryptocurrency forensics and investigation.Under the aegis of the Narcotics Control Bureau, India’s central law enforcement and intelligence agency, 141 officers underwent specialized training in the investigation of darknet activities, cryptocurrencies and other pertinent areas such as digital footprints.The report stated that workshops were set up that covered techniques for gathering intelligence and evidence from open sources and social media platforms, reflecting a commitment to staying ahead in the ever-evolving landscape of cybercrime.There’s clearly a need for this level of expertise, given an uptick in crypto-related scams in India and the broader Asia region as a whole in recent times. Earlier this week, it emerged that the Indian authorities had arrested eight individuals in relation to a $300 million cryptocurrency scam.Raj Kapoor, the founder of the India Blockchain Alliance (IBA), recently called for greater control when it comes to crypto-related illicit financing. Kapoor stated:”It is a kick on the backside for most governments. All regulatory bodies will take a closer look at crypto regulation. Governments will need to start implementing new rules and regulations.”I4C played a pivotal role in training over 2,800 cyber police officials. The training encompassed crypto forensics, investigations and emerging technologies like anonymization networks. The focus extended to addressing the misuse of mobile applications in the cyberspace realm.Ongoing blockchain tech adoptionAs India proactively prepares to combat potential crypto-related crimes amidst increased adoption, the nation is also delving into mainstream blockchain applications. In a recent stride towards digital transformation, Hindustan Petroleum (HPCL), the state-run oil and gas company, partnered with blockchain software firm Zupple Labs. Together, they launched a blockchain system designed to automate the verification of purchase orders (POs).HPCL’s spokesperson outlined the significance of this implementation to Cointelegraph, stating that the integration helps automate the verification of HPCL POs to external parties, utilizing the blockchain system alongside HPCL’s internal e-PO. This generates tamper-evident, verifiable POs, enhancing efficiency and transparency within industry processes.In a separate development, it emerged on Thursday that India’s Central Bureau of Investigation has appointed Singapore-headquartered digital asset market intelligence outfit Liminal to manage seized digital assets.This holistic approach, combining advancements in law enforcement training and embracing blockchain applications, underscores India’s commitment to navigating the evolving landscape of digital technologies while looking to ensure a secure and transparent future.