Crypto Titans Clash on Elon Musk’s X

Founders Exit Following Overhaul of NFT Startup RarioPolygon-based NFT platform Rario, specializing in cricket-related non-fungible tokens (NFTs), is experiencing a major transformation, with its founders, CEO Ankit Wadhwa and CTO Sunny Bhanot, departing the company after a two-year tenure.Investors in the startup are taking on a more prominent role in steering the direction of the Indian startup, according to a report from TechCrunch on Friday.Photo by Alessandro Bogliari on UnsplashDream11Dream11, a prominent Mumbai-based fantasy sports platform and one of Rario’s primary backers, alongside other investors, is said to be exerting pressure to gain greater control, resulting in the ousting of the firm’s founders. The development comes amid other significant shifts in Dream11’s leadership.Additionally, Rario is undergoing a broader restructuring effort that includes the elimination of various roles, according to sources who were cited by TechCrunch as being familiar with the matter.This recent upheaval coincides with reports of Dream11’s parent company, Dream Sports, taking measures to reduce operational costs. TechCrunch noted that Dream Sports is actively renegotiating several licensing agreements previously inked by Rario as part of cost-cutting measures.High profile investorsRario boasts a roster of high-profile investors, including global investment company Alpha Wave Global and cricket icon Sachin Tendulkar. In April 2022, the cricket NFT platform made waves by securing $120 million in a Series A funding round, asserting its dominance in the cricket NFT rights arena with over 900 cricketers on board at that time. It’s not clear what valuation the firm had at the time of the Series A funding round but in a prior round, Rario had been valued at $250 million.Founded in 2021, Rario set out with a mission to create digital cricket collectibles and foster an online community for passionate fans. By April 2021, the company had successfully sold 50,000 NFTs to sports enthusiasts spanning 20 countries.Cricket world partnershipsCricket is the second largest sport in the world with in excess of 1.5 billion fans worldwide. That leaves a lot of scope for Rario to harness NFTs to bring about new forms of engagement.Among Rario’s notable partnerships are agreements with cricket leagues such as Cricket Australia, the Australian Cricketers’ Association, the Caribbean Premier League, the Lanka Premier League, and the Abu Dhabi T10 League Legends League Cricket.Polygon changesPolygon Labs, the developer of the Ethereum-centric layer two scaling network upon which the Rario platform runs, also features India in its origin story. It too has seen upheaval at a managerial level recently. In July, the firm announced a number of senior positional changes. Its former Chief Legal Officer (CLO) was elevated to the position of CEO. Those changes saw Polygon Labs’ Indian Co-Founder Sandeep Naiwal transition to the role of Executive Chairman.Rario’s ongoing evolution reflects the dynamic nature of the NFT space, where startups must adapt to changing investor interests and market conditions. With its investors taking the reins, Rario faces a pivotal juncture in its journey to redefine how cricket fans engage with the sport through the exciting world of NFTs.

Singaporean Authorities Uncover $1.3M Crypto Mining ScamFour foreign nationals are facing charges in a Singaporean court related to a cryptocurrency mining investment scheme that allegedly cheated investors out of over S$1.8 million ($1.3 million).According to reports in local media, the accused individuals are associated with A&A Blockchain Technology Innovation, a Singaporean company that was previously investigated for potential cheating offenses related to the very same crypto mining scheme in 2022. The accused include Dutch national Yang Bin, who was the Chairman of A&A Blockchain at the time of the offenses, and Lu Huangbin, Wang Xinghong, and Chen Wei, who held various roles within the company. Lu, Wang, and Chen are Chinese nationals.Photo by Arul Kumaran on UnsplashConspiracy to cheat chargesThe four individuals are collectively facing twelve counts of engaging in a conspiracy to cheat, involving the aforementioned sum of money. Additionally, they are charged with carrying out payment services without the required license.The charges are connected to a cryptocurrency mining investment scheme offered by A&A Blockchain between May 2021 and February 2022. The scheme promised investors a fixed daily return of 0.5 percent, luring them in by falsely claiming ownership of a large number of cryptocurrency mining machines.Unlicensed crypto exchangeDuring the period of August 2021 to February 2022, A&A Blockchain operated a cryptocurrency exchange named AAEX, facilitating the trading of multiple cryptocurrencies. However, the company operated without a proper license from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for providing payment services in the country.Under the Penal Code, those convicted of cheating offenses can face penalties that include fines, imprisonment for up to a decade, or both. The accused face a total of 12 cheating charges, out of which 10 are amalgamated charges. If convicted of an amalgamated charge, the punishment could be doubled for a single incident of the offense. Furthermore, engaging in payment services without the necessary license can lead to a jail term of up to three years, a fine reaching S$125,000 ($92,000), or both.The cases against Chen, Wang, and Yang have been adjourned until next month. Meanwhile, Lu’s pretrial conference is scheduled for a later date in September. The charges against these individuals come in the wake of a large-scale operation targeting anti-money laundering offenses within the city-state.The operation resulted in the arrest and charging of ten individuals suspected of forgery, money laundering, and resisting arrest. The group had reportedly amassed assets worth approximately S$1 billion ($736 million), residing in affluent properties and owning luxury vehicles.Good actorsThe nascent nature of crypto is being used as a cover for scammers and while those bad actors get a disproportionate level of coverage, there are plenty of good actors engaging positively with the innovation at hand.As an example of genuine efforts being made in crypto mining, Beijing-based Canaan, a leading mining equipment manufacturer, intends to hold an event in Singapore next month to celebrate ten years in the business. Singapore is also home to well-known crypto miner, Bitdeer, a company with significant mining operations in North America, Bhutan, Norway, and elsewhere.As the industry matures and makes a better fist at self-regulation, in tandem with ever-improving regulations and controls at a national level, scammers using crypto-related activities as a foil for their criminal enterprise will be forced out of the sector.

Bankruptcy Judge Permits Terraform Labs to Subpoena FTXIn a significant development in the bankruptcy case of defunct crypto exchange FTX, a judge has granted Singapore-based Terraform Labs the authority to subpoena information related to its ongoing case brought by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Photo by Bermix Studio on UnsplashHack allegationsTerraform Labs, the blockchain company that developed the Terra blockchain and failed US dollar stablecoin UST, claims that the failures of its algorithmic stablecoin and governance token were the result of an attack from short-sellers, possibly involving Alameda Research (FTX’s sister company).The order, issued by Judge John Dorsey on Monday, allows Terraform Labs to serve subpoenas to FTX Trading and FTX US, aimed at collecting evidence to support its defense against the SEC’s allegations of fraud. According to court filings, lawyers representing the FTX Debtor have not formally objected to the court order.Terraform Labs’ request for subpoena power stems from its belief that short-sellers connected to FTX entities played a role in the failure of the algorithmic stablecoin and governance token, leading to the collapse of the crypto firm. The ability to obtain information from FTX through the subpoenas could be crucial in bolstering Terraform Labs’ defense against the SEC’s fraud charges.UST collapse falloutThe collapse of the UST stablecoin in 2022 contributed to a major market crash, resulting in a significant drop in the prices of many tokens. As a result, the company filed for bankruptcy in November 2022. The Co-Founder of Terra, Do Kwon, is currently serving a four-month sentence in a Montenegrin prison for using false travel documents. He may also face extradition to the United States or South Korea on fraud charges related to Terraform Labs.Motion to dismiss deniedIn a separate high-stakes ruling, US District Judge Jed Rakoff denied Terraform Labs’ motion to dismiss the securities fraud lawsuit filed by the SEC. The judge’s decision allows the SEC’s case against Terraform Labs and Do Kwon to proceed, rejecting defense arguments that the agency lacked jurisdiction and that Terraform’s TerraUSD stablecoin did not qualify as an unregistered security.Judge Rakoff’s ruling is a significant victory for the SEC as it intensifies its enforcement actions against crypto companies involved in allegedly unlawful token sales. He found the collapse of TerraUSD, which lost its dollar peg and incurred a $40 billion loss last year, plausible as a reason to consider the token as a security that should have been registered.Moreover, Rakoff dismissed Terraform’s claim that the SEC lacked the authority to regulate stablecoins without explicit Congressional authorization, asserting that the crypto industry was significant enough to warrant application of the “Major Questions Doctrine.” This doctrine limits agency overreach into major political issues but does not apply to the crypto asset markets.The judge also rebuffed Terraform Labs’ attempts to draw parallels between the Ripple case and its own. In the Ripple case, a different judge ruled that Ripple’s XRP token sales to retail investors did not violate securities laws due to the manner of purchase on secondary markets. Rakoff firmly stated that such distinctions did not apply under the legal Howey test governing whether crypto assets qualify as securities.