Flybit’s Bug Bounty Program to Strengthen Its Crypto Exchange Security

Bybit Denies Plans to Leave UK MarketReporting related to Dubai-based crypto exchange Bybit had suggested in recent days that the firm was leaving the UK market. However, the company has since responded to state that it has strongly reaffirmed its commitment to the UK market and its dedication to collaborate with regulators to find mutually agreeable solutions.Photo by Marcin Nowak on UnsplashCompany clarificationThat speculation had arisen in the first place on the basis of difficulties the business may experience as a consequence of the upcoming implementation of new strict marketing rules for crypto firms in the UK. Taking to social media on Thursday, the company stated:”At Bybit, we consider the UK to be a highly important market for the advancement of crypto and blockchain technologies. Our commitment to this market is unwavering, and we intend to maintain our presence in the UK for the long term. Meanwhile, we are dedicated to working collaboratively with regulators upon the new law to ensure the responsible and secure development of the industry.”The reports published earlier in the week had fueled speculation that Bybit might exit the UK market, along with other jurisdictions characterized by rigorous crypto regulations. The concerns primarily centered around the UK’s recently introduced financial promotion rules, designed to bolster customer protection and enhance understanding of crypto investments.Ben Zhou, Co-Founder and CEO of Bybit, commented on the situation, underscoring the exchange’s unwavering commitment to regulatory compliance. Zhou confirmed that ongoing discussions with UK regulators aimed to find mutually beneficial solutions, aligning the interests of all stakeholders involved. He emphasized Bybit’s commitment to keeping its community well-informed about the progress of these discussions.Regulatory changesThe recent move by Bybit is in direct response to regulatory changes introduced by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in June. These changes were implemented to improve transparency and enhance customer protection within the crypto sector, with a particular focus on ensuring that UK customers have a clear understanding of the risks associated with crypto investments. The FCA also outlined various pathways for asset promotion, including those involving FCA-authorized personnel or crypto companies registered with the FCA.Exchanges have been very much under the cosh in 2023 when it comes to regulatory pressures. Bybit, accompanied by MEXC Global, Bitforex, and Bitget, were all issued with a warning by the Japanese regulator, the Financial Services Agency (FSA), in April on the basis that the exchanges were running unregistered crypto asset exchange business operations within Japan. In May Binance left the Canadian market.In the months that followed, the leading global crypto exchange was forced out of markets in Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands, and Cyprus due to regulatory pushback. In May Seychelles-based Huobi was ordered to cease its business offering in Malaysia by the local regulator.Moving forwardDespite these setbacks, Bybit has been making efforts to move the business forward. In May it obtained approval from the authorities in Kazakhstan to offer its services within the country. Some weeks prior, it announced that it had chosen Dubai as the global exchange’s headquarters.The firm also introduced TradeGPT recently, an AI-powered educational tool designed to enrich traders’ engagement with the crypto market.

China has provided insights into the conviction of Zhao Dong, the influential crypto over-the-counter (OTC) trader and widely known founder of the RenrenBit crypto trading desk. The ‘OTC King’Last Wednesday, China’s Supreme Procuratorate disclosed that Zhao, known as the "OTC King," was handed down a substantial prison sentence for engaging in illegal foreign exchange and crypto business operations. The case is emblematic of China's persistent efforts to clamp down on cryptocurrency trading, even when conducted through less transparent channels like OTC desks, private chat groups and stablecoins.Photo by Hanson Lu on UnsplashTracing fundsIn their comprehensive disclosure, the Chinese authorities outlined the meticulous investigation that led to Zhao Dong's conviction. The focus was on tracing fund movements across Chinese bank accounts, overseas cash pools and the circulation of Tether and Bitcoin. Investigators honed in on accounts associated with Zhao Dong and the chat groups used for trading activities. Their arsenal included detailed bank records, WeChat conversations, testimonies from Zhao's OTC agents and other documentary evidence. The report highlighted that all defendants, including Zhao Dong, confessed to the process of collecting dirhams in cash in Dubai, paying RMB to the other party's designated account, buying Tether with dirhams, and allowing the domestic gang to illegally sell it back for RMB. Seven year sentenceIn one of the alleged schemes, Zhao Dong purportedly orchestrated crypto-fiat trades between Dubai-based entities holding cash piles in United Arab Emirates (UAE) dirhams and Chinese contacts within the country. With numerous related recipients confirming that the funds Zhao received were payments from foreigners, the prosecution's case was made so much stronger. Zhao unsuccessfully argued during three public court hearings that his actions constituted digital currency transactions and not a breach of foreign exchange laws. The prosecution countered with evidence from the group's chat records, emphasizing the nature of foreign exchange in their dealings. The court ultimately rendered a verdict, sentencing Zhao Dong to seven years in prison and imposing a 2.3 million Chinese yuan ($325,000) fine. This conviction serves as a stark reminder of the stringent regulatory stance that China has adopted towards cryptocurrency trading. Zhao Dong was considered one of China's most influential OTC crypto traders. He was a Bitfinex shareholder and founder of the D Fund venture capital fund. He established RenrenBit in August 2018, incorporating the company in Singapore. The influential crypto trader is also believed to have been involved in assisting stablecoin-issuer Tether to launch its Tether Yuan product. However, once the authorities moved against him, RenrenBit was taken offline while Tether scrapped its pursuit of Tether Yuan. Despite his influence, Zhao has ultimately become a symbol of the government's commitment to curbing such crypto trading activities within mainland China. The outcome underscores the severity of China's regulatory crackdown on cryptocurrency trading and sends a strong message to other players in the crypto space within the country.

Dispute Embroils Bitget in Legal Battle With Crypto InfluencerBitget, the crypto exchange registered in Seychelles, finds itself entangled in a legal dispute with prominent crypto influencer Evan Luthra.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashAccount freezing allegationsThe conflict stems from Luthra’s allegations of account freezing and loss of funds after a token listing incident in March. Luthra has filed a lawsuit against Bitget, accusing the exchange of withholding $200,000 in Tether (USDT) without adequate explanation, while also freezing his account.The legal drama follows Luthra’s involvement with the Reel Star project, where he served as an advisor for the platform which is aimed at creators. As compensation for his collaboration with the project, Luthra received Reel Token (REELT), the project’s utility token.Bitget alleged market manipulationUpon the listing of REELT tokens, Luthra reportedly sold 1.3 million tokens on Bitget. In response, Bitget claims it faced a manipulative attack orchestrated by a group of traders attempting to profit from market manipulation immediately after the token’s listing. This allegedly caused a significant drop in the token’s price, prompting Bitget’s decision to freeze Luthra’s account.Bitget states that it contacted Luthra seeking an explanation for the suspicious trading behavior. Luthra acknowledged the token sale but failed to provide satisfactory reasons for his actions, according to Bitget’s version of events. The exchange maintains that user protection is its foremost priority and that it takes swift action against illegal or fraudulent behaviors.$16 million damages claimLuthra refutes the allegations, asserting his innocence and citing alleged approval from Reel Star’s Co-Founder Navdeep Sharma for his token sale plans. He seeks a substantial $16 million in damages, in addition to the frozen funds. Luthra claims that Bitget unjustly deprived him of his tokens, asserting his status as a fully KYCed user entitled to access his holdings.In the aftermath of the incident, Bitget conducted an investigation and offered a compensation plan for affected clients. Gracy Chen, Bitget’s Managing Director, emphasized the exchange’s commitment to user protection and its actions against illicit activities on its platform. Addressing the matter on Twitter, Chen didn’t hold back in her commentary on Luthra, stating that he “has a history of fraudulent activities,” which she says were exposed by crypto journalist CoffeeZilla.The legal dispute has ignited debates within the crypto community. Supporters of Luthra contend that his case underscores broader issues faced by users of centralized exchanges, shedding light on the need for improved user rights and protection. On the other hand, some argue that Bitget acted appropriately to safeguard its users and the market integrity.CZ brought into the disputeThe legal battle has attracted attention from influential figures in the crypto industry. Against a backdrop of a very public airing of the dispute on Twitter, in a recent tweet Luthra invited Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the CEO of Binance, to respond to Luthra’s claim that Bitget spreads rumors about other exchanges. CZ was having none of it, writing: “You should talk to them, right? We are not a regulator for other exchanges.”The case highlights the intricate challenges surrounding market manipulation and token listings within the crypto space. As it unfolds, the outcome could potentially set a precedent for similar situations involving token listings, market manipulation, and user protection.