Bullish Emerges as a Bidder for Bankrupt FTX Exchange

Hong Kong Lawmaker Explores Digital Asset Links With MainlandIn a move aimed at bolstering its position as a rising global Web3 hub, Hong Kong Legislative Council member Johnny Ng has expressed his aspiration to foster greater collaboration between digital asset platforms in Hong Kong and a Shanghai-based exchange.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashDigital asset exchange interconnectivityAs Hong Kong continues to position itself as a key player in the emerging Web3 landscape, Ng envisions a future where licensed virtual asset exchanges in Hong Kong could be interconnected with their counterparts in Shanghai.Ng’s remarks came during an interview with Chinese media outlet The Paper. Drawing a parallel with the established Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect program that seamlessly connects the stock markets of both cities, Ng raised the question of whether a similar connection could be established for licensed digital asset exchanges. Ng’s idea hinges on the potential to bridge appropriate platforms in Shanghai with those licensed in Hong Kong for virtual asset trading.Interconnected talent poolThe lawmaker’s enthusiasm for interconnectivity also extends to the talent pool. He expressed his desire for more Web3 talent exchanges between Hong Kong and the mainland, recognizing Shanghai’s status as a financial hub boasting numerous exceptional financial enterprises.Hong Kong’s approach to the Web3 landscape stands in contrast to mainland China’s stringent cryptocurrency regulations. While China banned cryptocurrency transactions in 2021, Hong Kong has embraced crypto firms, even encouraging partnerships between these firms and local banks.This year, Hong Kong authorities unveiled a series of cryptocurrency-related policy statements, aimed at fortifying its stature as a global financial center. A significant step followed in December, when the Hong Kong Legislative Council passed an amendment introducing a comprehensive licensing framework for virtual asset service providers (VASPs).In a recent development underscoring Hong Kong’s pro-crypto stance, HashKey and OSL have become the pioneering recipients of licenses for retail trading under the new regulatory regime, which commenced on June 1.Differing policy approachesPeople following developments in crypto and Web3 in China and East Asia have been speculating if the strategic positive shift in Hong Kong towards developing as a regional hub relative to the sector is indicative of a softening in the approach of mainland China towards the industry. It appears that Hong Kong’s pursuit of crypto business has been sanctioned by Beijing.Commentators have been monitoring the emergence of further encouraging signals. In May, Chinese state television featured a segment that covered cryptocurrency and in particular Bitcoin. Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) was sufficiently encouraged by the development to suggest that it was “a big deal,” although the clip was later removed from the broadcaster’s website.Ng’s proposal aligns with the broader narrative of Hong Kong’s ambitious push into the Web3 landscape, capitalizing on its favorable regulatory environment to attract crypto-related ventures. As discussions evolve around the potential interconnectivity between Hong Kong and Shanghai’s digital asset exchanges, the global cryptocurrency community watches with interest to see if there are any emerging signs that Beijing will reciprocate positively.

Taiwanese cryptocurrency exchange under investigation for money launderingBitgin, a cryptocurrency exchange in Taiwan, is currently under police investigation for alleged money laundering, with its Chief Operating Officer, Yuting Zhang, arrested in connection to the infamous “88 Guild Hall” money laundering incident. The exchange is cooperating fully with the investigation and has assured users that its operations remain unaffected.Photo by Adam Jang on Unsplash‘88 Guild Hall’ scandalThe “88 Guild Hall” scandal, which unfolded from late 2021 to March 2022, implicated Zhang in a massive money laundering network. The controversy exposed a multi-billion dollar operation orchestrated by local businessmen Zhemin Guo and Chengwen Tu, utilizing a network of foreign exchange offices and crypto exchanges.Yuling Tsai, General Counsel of the Taiwan VASP Association, addressed the situation, stating: “This time, a member of the preparatory group was involved in the investigation case. The preparatory group immediately held a meeting and issued a public response. The members involved in the case also took the initiative to suspend participation in the work of the preparatory group.”Business as usualIn an official statement, Bitgin confirmed Zhang’s association with the scandal and clarified that the ongoing investigation has not disrupted its operations. The exchange emphasized its commitment to cooperating with authorities, providing all necessary assistance to facilitate a smooth investigation process.The statement reads: “At present, Bitgin is fully cooperating with the investigating unit and actively providing all necessary assistance to ensure the smooth conduct of the investigation and hopes that the facts can be clarified as soon as possible.”Bitgin also confirmed that in light of the charges, the COO has ceased all communications with counterparties.Focus on regulationTaiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) outlined earlier this year its intention to restrict the activity of non-compliant offshore crypto exchanges. While cryptocurrency exchanges are not officially regulated yet, local operators have taken cues from the FSC to move towards self-regulation. A preparatory group was formed in September with Bitgin participating as a founding member.While Taiwan still doesn’t have a regulatory framework in place, it has applied anti-money laundering (AML) regulation to crypto businesses. In August, leading crypto exchange Binance initiated steps to register for AML compliance in Taiwan.Earlier this year, Taiwanese officials suggested that they would foster self-regulation while proposing the classification of crypto regulations within their own unique business category. Efforts were furthered last month when legislators introduced a cryptocurrency bill for its inaugural reading.JPEX falloutBeyond Bitgin, Taiwan is grappling with the fallout from wayward crypto exchange JPEX, which is accused of orchestrating Hong Kong’s largest financial scam. The authorities raided the local office of JPEX and identified suspects involved in the alleged fraud. To compound matters, local police also uncovered a $320 million crypto money laundering operation earlier this month.The incidents highlight the ongoing challenges faced by regulators in the region as they strive to protect investors from fraudulent activities.As the investigation unfolds, the Taiwanese cryptocurrency industry, along with its self-regulatory initiatives, remains under scrutiny, emphasizing the broader need for regulatory frameworks to safeguard the interests of investors and maintain the integrity of the market.

Bitget withdraws from Hong Kong crypto marketSeychelles-incorporated cryptocurrency derivatives platform Bitget has made a decision to permanently exit the Hong Kong market, discontinuing its efforts to obtain a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license.Photo by SHUJA OFFICIAL on UnsplashBitgetX platform shutdownThe decision comes only months after it had introduced its BitgetX platform to comply with local regulations. The company, which bases its operations out of Singapore, is a well-known entity in the crypto space, renowned as the operator of the 12th-largest cryptocurrency exchange globally in terms of 24-hour trading volume. It made this revelation on Monday, citing what it referred to as “business and market-related considerations.”In a published statement, the company said:”With a heavy heart, we regret to inform you that due to business and market related considerations, we have decided not to pursue a Virtual Asset Trading Platform (VATP) license in Hong Kong. As a result of this decision, the BitgetX website (www.BitgetX.hk) will cease its operations effective December 13, 2023. At the same time, Bitgetx.hk will permanently exit the Hong Kong market.”While outlining that BitgetX will close its doors, the firm urged users to withdraw their assets beforehand. Bitget is among a handful of exchanges that had publicly expressed their intent to secure a license following Hong Kong’s proactive push over the course of the past year to embrace the virtual asset sector.Broader challengesThe decision to abandon the pursuit of a VATP license echoes the broader challenges faced by the cryptocurrency industry in Hong Kong. Despite the city’s recent enthusiastic regulatory embrace of the virtual asset sector, a number of stumbling blocks remain.High compliance costs and the lingering aftermath of the JPEX financial scandal have hindered Hong Kong’s aspirations to establish itself as a leading crypto hub. A report back in June identified the major cost implications of acquiring a license in Hong Kong. At the time, it was estimated that the required spend to obtain a VATP license could range from $2.55 million to $25.5 million.Banking crypto companies has also become a major bottleneck. In June, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) urged banks such as HSBC, Standard Chartered and the Bank of China to bank the crypto sector, having identified a reluctance amongst them to do so.Limited interestThe forthcoming closure of BitgetX adds to a growing trend of limited interest in Hong Kong’s new licensing scheme. Only five companies, all local, have submitted applications for virtual asset licenses to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). This list began publication in response to the JPEX scandal, which significantly damaged public trust in virtual assets.The challenges faced by the industry go beyond regulatory hurdles. The damaged public trust, coupled with the high-profile exit of JPEX, has contributed to the hesitancy of international crypto platforms in pursuing licenses in Hong Kong. The abrupt withdrawal of Bitget raises questions about the viability of Hong Kong as a central player in the cryptocurrency industry and underscores the complexities faced by exchanges navigating the evolving landscape of the digital asset sector.