The Sandbox Adds Singapore Virtual Neighborhood Lion City

OKX and Bybit Exclude Sanctioned Russian Banks from P2P ServicesIn response to the mounting pressure on crypto firms to improve general compliance standards, prominent digital asset exchanges OKX and Bybit, based in the Seychelles and Dubai, have decided to delist sanctioned Russian banks from their peer-to-peer (P2P) services.Photo by Eduardo Soares on UnsplashThe move by the two exchange platforms, brought to light by Russian media reports, comes just days after Binance had done the same.Tinkoff Bank and Sberbank, two significant Russian financial institutions, have been expunged from the P2P platforms of OKX and Bybit. This effectively removes the option for Russian crypto users to exchange their assets for fiat through these banks. The decision sees the exchanges fall into line with Western sanctions imposed on the banks due to Russia’s actions in Ukraine.Enforcement difficultiesWhile the removal of these banks from the platforms is a significant step, the nature of P2P transactions introduces complexities in enforcing such bans comprehensively. Reports indicate that certain users are still engaging in P2P transactions with these banks through private channels, showcasing the challenges in regulating this decentralized method of exchange.In the case of OKX, at the time of publication, the platform still allows Russian users to receive fiat through accounts held with the Russian Standard Bank and the Russian branch of Raiffeisen Bank.This action aligns OKX and Bybit with Binance, which faced a similar scenario last week. Binance came under scrutiny when it continued to list the sanctioned banks as part of its payment methods. Following a report by The Wall Street Journal, Binance eventually removed the banks from its platform.Binance’s compliance effortsA spokesperson from Binance conveyed that while the banks have been delisted, the company remains committed to ensuring compliance by continuously updating its systems.“We regularly update our systems to ensure compliance with local and global regulatory standards,” they said. “When gaps are pointed out to us, we seek to address and remediate them as soon as possible.”Despite this stance and the latest action it has taken, users on Binance’s P2P platform are still posting ads for the sale of crypto using the “green bank,” referring to the sanctioned banks, as the preferred method of payment.Western-imposed sanctions have led to significant economic challenges in Russia, pushing individuals and institutions towards cryptocurrencies as a potential solution. In a country that has previously banned private cryptocurrencies, the attraction of decentralized digital assets has grown stronger as a means to break through the sanctions-induced financial stranglehold.Sanctions impactReports from Russian financial institutions reveal dramatic declines in profits, some as high as 90%, as they find themselves cut off from the global payments network SWIFT. Tinkoff Bank, for instance, reported a substantial decline of 67% in the second quarter of 2022, attributing the drop to escalating global tensions.In April, the Bank of Russia introduced a bill that could potentially allow cryptocurrencies to be used in international trade, a measure aimed at mitigating the impact of sanctions. While this could potentially open doors for cross-border transactions involving cryptocurrencies, the restrictions on local transactions remain intact.

Crypto.com unlocks regulated expansion through UK FCA licensing awardSingapore’s Crypto.com has obtained an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the United Kingdom. The approval complements the platform’s existing status as a registered crypto-asset business, a milestone achieved in August 2022.Photo by Robert Tudor on UnsplashSet to expand product offeringIn a press release published to its website on Monday, the company outlined that the EMI license represents a pivotal step for the firm, empowering the exchange to issue and manage electronic money. This expansion goes beyond its initial crypto-asset business focus, which concentrated primarily on compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) regulations.The regulatory nod came after Crypto.com underwent a comprehensive examination of its business and compliance practices, ensuring alignment with the stringent AML and CTF requirements in the UK.With this authorization in hand, Crypto.com is poised to introduce a range of e-money products tailored for the UK market. This move aligns the company with other cryptocurrency firms like Coinbase and Gemini, which have previously secured similar licenses.Notwithstanding that, while some other well-known platforms have struggled with recently introduced rules related to the marketing of crypto products and services in the UK, Crypto.com’s UK subsidiary company, FORIS DAX UK LIMITED, had successfully registered with the FCA in October.Building out global expansionWhile a trend has emerged in 2023 for crypto platforms to expand within regional markets around the world beyond the United States, Crypto.com has been following a global strategy for some time already. Last month, CRO DAX Middle East, a subsidiary company of Crypto.com, secured a license from the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) in Dubai to offer regulated virtual asset services.Earlier this year, Patrick Yoon, General Manager of Crypto.com’s Korean business outlined plans for expansion within that market, including the aspiration to obtain the banking relationship required in order to conduct virtual asset trading business in South Korea.Dutch licensing successEarlier in July, Crypto.com received approval from the Dutch central bank, De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB), to extend its cryptocurrency services in the Netherlands.This recognition places Crypto.com among the 36 cryptocurrency-related businesses approved by the Dutch central bank, joining major industry players like Coinbase Europe, eToro and Bitstamp. Notably, this approval followed Binance’s inability to secure registration in the Netherlands, leading to its exit from the country.Expressing enthusiasm about this achievement, Kris Marszalek, CEO of Crypto.com, emphasized the importance of the UK market for their business. He stated:“The UK has and continues to be a hugely important market for our business and the greater industry. We look forward to continuing to collaborate with a global regulatory leader in the FCA in our collective pursuit of responsible innovation for crypto.”Crypto.com’s global expansion strategy includes regulatory approvals in Singapore, France, Italy, Dubai and Australia. However, in a strategic shift, the platform discontinued its institutional exchange service for professional customers in the United States in June. Citing a decline in demand, this move aligns with the broader market conditions in the U.S., influenced by ongoing legal actions against major exchanges such as Binance and Coinbase.

In a move to enhance the oversight of cross-border wire transfers involving virtual assets, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), the central bank of the Philippines, is fortifying the implementation of regulations relative to crypto transfers.Photo by C Bueza on UnsplashTravel rule clarificationsLocal news outlet, the English language newspaper The Philippine Star reported that central bank memorandum 2023-042 provides clarifications on the travel rule for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). The travel rule requires financial institutions to pass on information to the next institution where a transaction takes place. The BSP aims to bring greater clarity to several aspects, including the applicability of the P50,000 transaction threshold and expectations regarding transactions involving jurisdictions without travel rules. Additionally, further interpretation is being provided concerning the extension of the Philippine travel rule to non-custodial VASPs and regulatory expectations surrounding transactions with unhosted wallets or crypto wallets controlled directly by their owners, rather than managed by third-party service providers. FATF compliance ambitionThis regulatory move is in response to the directives from the Paris-based Financial Action Task Force (FATF). In 2021 the Philippines came under greater scrutiny from the intergovernmental organization, when it was included on its "gray list," making it a candidate for increased monitoring. The FATF has called upon the Philippines to establish guidelines for the travel rule to prevent terrorists and criminals from exploiting virtual asset transfers for the unrestricted movement of their assets and to detect and prevent misuse effectively.BSP-supervised financial institutions (BSFIs) are now mandated to scrutinize specific details of virtual asset transfers, including the originator's name, account number used in the transaction, originator's physical address or national identity and the beneficiary's name and account number. International moves towards complianceThis latest move by the Philippine central bank is not unusual. In recent months, a plethora of similarly motivated central banks around the world have tightened up on crypto regulation as it relates to the FATF directives. Being on the FATF's "gray list" is bad for a country’s reputation. It has the potential to result in loss of investor confidence and lead to higher compliance costs and greater monitoring. Additionally, it may have an impact on trade relations and damage a country’s ability to access international finance.  Turkey has also found itself on the organization’s gray list. Working towards repairing that situation, Turkey is in the process of establishing a crypto regulatory framework that will be FATF compliant.In May, Pakistan went a step further in banning cryptocurrency. At the time, its Minister of State for Finance and Revenue, Aisha Ghaus Pasha, stated that the ban had been a requirement for Pakistan’s removal from the FATF gray list. A tightening of crypto regulations has also occurred in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and in Hong Kong more recently, as those territories work towards ensuring FATF compliance. The BSP emphasizes that transactions not surpassing the P50,000 threshold or its equivalent in foreign currency must include the names and account numbers of both the originator and beneficiary. Both originating and beneficiary VASPs are required to establish and adhere to robust sanction screening procedures, ensuring compliance with sanctions lists and preventing transactions involving sanctioned individuals, entities, or jurisdictions.