bitFlyer Moves to Comply With Travel Rule

Datachain Secures Funding from Japan’s MUFG to Advance Blockchain Interoperability InitiativesDatachain, a Japanese blockchain interoperability solution provider, has secured funding from Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFJ), one of Japan’s largest banking institutions, according to a press release. This investment will boost their collaboration as they work together to advance ongoing initiatives involving stablecoins, security tokens, and cross-chain technology.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashGrowing token marketIn a joint report by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) and Singapore-based investment platform ADDX, it is projected that the market for illiquid asset tokenization could reach $16.1 trillion by 2030 (as a conservative estimate) or potentially $68 trillion in a best-case scenario. This growth in the illiquid asset tokenization market, coupled with the expanding stablecoins and cryptocurrencies market, is expected to drive the overall digital asset market’s expansion.Cross-chain techDatachain will collaborate with MUFG and other partners to develop an infrastructure that enables the transfer of digital assets across different blockchains. Boasting prowess in cross-chain technology, Datachain has been conducting tests and collaborative research with numerous companies in Japan and abroad. Notably, Datachain has been working closely with MUFG to drive initiatives utilizing stablecoins scheduled for issuance and distribution through the Progmat Coin stablecoin platform.Moreover, Datachain, MUFG, and cross-chain bridge provider TOKI will form a three-way partnership aimed at commercializing the issuance and distribution of stablecoins on public blockchains like Ethereum between April and June 2024.Datachain is also collaborating with MUFG to promote cross-chain settlements involving security tokens based on stablecoins. Their goal is to realize this initiative in cooperation with securities firms by 2024.Starting with this new funding, Datachain plans to expedite its business expansion by seeking investments from other companies that can create synergies.Tomohiro Kimura, Director and Managing Executive Officer at MUFG, commented on the investment, emphasizing MUFG’s commitment to the digital asset market’s anticipated growth. According to Kimura, MUFG has established and promoted Progmat Coin in preparation for the expanding digital asset market. Highlighting that multi-chain and cross-chain transactions are essential to the future of digital assets, Kimura expressed delight over MUFG’s investment in Datachain, citing the blockchain company’s unparalleled expertise in key technology areas such as multichains and cross-chain transactions. He also highlighted MUFG’s increased involvement as a shareholder in Datachain, underlining its dedication to making a substantial impact in the digital asset market.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the city-state’s central bank and primary financial regulator, has set a deadline of June 30 for unlicensed digital token service providers (DTSPs) working out of Singapore to cease offering their services to clients in overseas markets.Photo by Hu Chen on UnsplashResponding to feedbackThe deadline emerged by way of a process MAS has followed as part of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022 (FSM Act). Last October, the regulator invited feedback from stakeholders related to the authority’s approach to the regulation of DTSPs. MAS published its response to that feedback on May 30.  It stated:”DTSPs which are subject to a licensing requirement under section 137 of the FSM Act must suspend or cease carrying on a business of providing DT services outside Singapore by 30 June 2025.” It added that it was not including any transitional arrangement for DTSPs despite MAS receiving such a suggestion from a number of feedback respondents. Instead, unlicensed DTSPs will need to abide by the June 30 deadline and have acquired a license by then or cease unlicensed activity.The regulator defines DTSPs as individuals, partnerships or Singapore corporations operating from a place of business in Singapore, including those formed or incorporated in Singapore who offer digital token services outside Singapore. Those found in breach of the regulation could face up to three years in prison and fines of up to S$250,000 ($195,000). Companies who have already obtained licensing or those exempted by way of the Securities and Futures Act, Payment Services Act and the Financial Advisers Act are free to continue trading. Challenging licensing requirementsThose who wish to become compliant will have to satisfy some challenging requirements. For those granted a license, an annual license fee of S$10,000 ($7,780) applies. Small-scale DTSPs need to satisfy a $150,000 ($116,670) ongoing capital requirement, while larger, well-established DTSPs must comply with a S$250,000 ($195,000) capital requirement. Additionally, MAS has put in place competency requirements related to a DTSP's CEO, directors, partners and managers. Hagen Rooke, a partner at law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, outlined on LinkedIn that while it's possible for unlicensed operators to obtain licensing, it will be very difficult to get a license. In its feedback response document, the regulator stated: “MAS will approach the licensing of DTSPs in a prudent and cautious manner and there will be extremely limited circumstances under which MAS will consider granting an applicant a licence under section 138 of the FSM Act.” Rooke advised crypto companies that may be affected to act swiftly in order to derisk through an operational restructuring or removing the businesses' Singapore touchpoints. He suggested that firms need to consider if it has customers outside of Singapore or front-office functions located outside of the city-state to determine if they could be affected by this regulatory measure. A number of Asian countries have moved to take action against unlicensed foreign firms that have engaged with local investors, with Thailand becoming the latest country to do so recently. However, the Singaporean authorities have approached the issue from the opposite perspective, citing the potential reputational risk that unlicensed DTSPs pose for Singapore.

Several South Korean crypto-only exchanges have long been struggling to keep their business afloat due to their prolonged weak performances. The local news outlet Etoday reported that the persistent underperformance of these local crypto exchanges is mounting pressure on their corporate operation and management, resulting in them shutting down their businesses. The situation hinders them from meeting the requirements set by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC).  Their inability to generate sufficient revenue, due to faltering token trading volumes, makes complying with the FIU guidelines a daunting task.Photo by Anne Nygård on UnsplashCascading closure of crypto exchanges According to crypto industry insiders, local crypto-only exchanges including Cashierest, Coinbit, Huobi Korea, Probit and Tennten have announced their service closure as early as the second half of last year. On Nov. 6, Cashierest announced it was shutting down its services, with Coinbit following suit in the same month. The cascading closure announcements from crypto exchanges raised concerns about their potential harm on investors.  In an effort to protect crypto investors, the FIU has released a statement that local crypto exchanges are obliged to meet the requirements of the FIU in compliance with the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, despite their closing of services. Furthermore, the regulator said finalizing business closure requires due assessment by the FIU.  "Virtual asset service providers (VASPs) must notify their users of the closure and explain how to reclaim their assets at least one month before the business closing date. They must also support users to withdraw their assets for at least three months before closing," the FIU stated.  Struggling to meet FIU requirements However, some point out that it would be challenging for near-bankrupt crypto exchanges to run a customer service center for more than three months. Some exchanges allow users to deposit and withdraw their assets until their closure, as they would under normal conditions, but charge additional fees afterward. "It is very demanding to operate customer services when we're seeing no actual gains," one exchange official said.  It has been found that some crypto exchanges failed to register a change in their business state with the FIU, which is mandatory in the event of business location or contact changes, under the Financial Transaction Reports Act.  When Etoday reporters visited the offices of some of these crypto exchanges, they were met with empty rooms. One person who is familiar with the matter said, "The exchange has moved its office to another location and is scheduled to resume service in March."