Coin Oasis Founder Thinks UAE Set Up For Crypto Success

The Philippines Forging Crypto Reg. Path US Could Learn FromThe Philippines has demonstrated best practice in operating a sensible regulatory framework relative to cryptocurrency while the United States has erred by engaging in regulation via enforcement while responding after the horse has bolted in relation to a string of crypto company collapses. That’s according to Robert De Guzman, Head of Legal Compliance at Philippines-based cryptocurrency exchange Coins.ph.©Unsplash/C BuezaIn an opinion piece published in Forkcast News on Tuesday, De Guzman lays out his view as to what’s required in terms of regulation, while drawing comparisons between the application of regulation relative to crypto in both jurisdictions.The need for “sensible” regulationDe Guzman believes that the crypto industry’s recent failures are a wake-up call for the whole sector. Losses of billions of dollars affected Celsius Network, BlockFi, Voyager Digital, Genesis, and FTX, and led to Silvergate, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), and Signature banks’ collapse in a week. To maintain consumers’ trust, he believes that sensible regulation is necessary for the crypto exchanges dealing with digital assets.The legal compliance expert cites the FTX collapse. FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried’s empire was among the largest collapses. FTX pretended to support regulation, but its true nature was an offshore exchange for global clients. Nonetheless, some businesses act on their regulation support by acquiring licenses and complying with central bank audits in the countries of operation.State-level and industry-level regulationThe crypto industry being open to self regulation is one element of the solution, he says. Regulators must proactively protect their consumers from scams and business failures, not just clean up the mess after millions of people have been harmed.Regulatory failuresDe Guzman points the finger at reactionary regulatory action. Regulators filed charges against crypto industry founders after their collapse. Previously, they missed the problems of the largest companies. FTX, based in the Bahamas, was mismanaged, and American regulators only responded after customer issues. Regulations by enforcement, preferred in several countries, wait for failure to happen before taking action. Over-regulation through enforcement pushes platforms offshore, where Wild West-type environments thrive, with clear consequences.Regulators in some countries focus on surface-level questions, like which tokens should be considered securities, while others, like in the Philippines, prioritize execution-level details to protect consumers. Anti-money laundering measures and custody are core issues, with the G-7’s Financial Action Task Force’s Travel Rule likely to be more strictly applied. Active regulation and audits are needed to ensure financial platforms act responsibly with customer deposits. Basic rules need to be put in place through a licensing regime, followed by regulation of market practices like commingling of assets, self-dealing, and trading against customers.The Philippines sensible approach to regulationThe Coins.ph legal guru holds out his home country as exemplary in terms of its approach to regulation. The Philippines’ regulatory regime requires a virtual asset service provider (VASP) license to operate a crypto exchange, as well as additional licenses for other services. The country’s central bank, BSP, directly regulates all crypto exchanges and expands its crypto regulations to adapt to market needs. KYC processes in the Philippines require recognition of valid ID documents from across 82 provinces.Additionally, the BSP expects the industry to cooperate in quarterly audits where they share balance sheet information and disclose digital assets in hot and cold wallets. Regulators in the Philippines are proactive and knowledgeable about the crypto space, which sets a sensible framework based on customer protection.

Korean Lawmakers Complete First Rough Draft of Virtual Asset User Protection BillKorean lawmakers have completed the first rough draft of the virtual asset user protection bill at a National Policy Committee meeting held later last month.©Pexels/Matthias ZomerAgreeing on term usage ‘virtual assets’So far, 18 bills have been proposed to regulate cryptocurrencies, and the lawmakers and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) agreed to use the term “virtual assets” to encompass similar terms such as digital assets and crypto assets.Phased enactment of billsThe bills are likely to be reviewed under the title “Virtual Asset User Protection Act.” The bipartisan group agreed to enact the bills in phases, introducing the user protection bill in the first phase and the virtual asset listing and issuance bill in the second phase.Meanwhile, there were mixed opinions on the content of the bills. In particular, there was debate over whether the bills should stipulate that the central bank digital currency (CBDC) is excluded from virtual assets, and whether the bills should include a standard for determining if a virtual asset is a security.Debate over stipulating CBDC’s statusThe stipulation of excluding CBDC from virtual assets was the most divisive topic since it would lead to defining the conditions for other assets such as non-fungible tokens. Moreover, the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, which currently regulates virtual asset service providers (VASPs), does not contain any stipulation on CBDC. Some raised concerns that such discrepancies could later cause confusion. In the end, assembly members decided to discuss the matter again in April after consulting with the Bank of Korea and the Ministry of Government Legislation.Criteria for classifying virtual assets as securitiesRegarding whether to include criteria for classifying virtual assets as securities, the lawmakers and financial regulators took different sides.Lee Yong-woo, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, underlined that a clear statement of the relationship between the issuer and the recipient of virtual assets in a whitepaper can determine their security status. He added that such provisions should be included in the bills.Park Min-woo, an FSC official, on the other hand, commented on a cautious note that in case virtual assets fall under the category of securities, they may not be applicable to the virtual asset act. He explained that VASPs might deal with both securities and virtual assets, and in such cases, there could be a misunderstanding that VASPs are not subject to the virtual asset act simply because they trade securities.

SC Ventures cues up $100M crypto startup investment vehicle in UAESC Ventures, the Singapore-headquartered fintech investment arm of British financial services giant Standard Chartered, is set to forge a “Digital Asset Joint Venture” investment company in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in collaboration with Japanese financial giant SBI Holdings.Photo by ZQ Lee on UnsplashBroad spectrum of crypto sector investmentThe CEO of SC Ventures, Alex Manson, outlined the joint venture’s strategic objectives in a press release published from Dubai on Thursday. Manson emphasized a focus on making strategic and minority investments in crucial areas such as market infrastructure, risk management, compliance tools, DeFi, tokenization, consumer payments and the metaverse.SBI Holdings has been collaborating quite a bit with Standard Chartered when it comes to the digital assets space over the course of the past year. It has invested in Standard Chartered subsidiary company Zodia Custody, a digital assets custodian. Subsequently, Zodia Custody has gone on to launch its services in Dubai, and in September, the company launched its services in Singapore.Meanwhile, SBI is similarly invested in Standard Chartered subsidiary Zodia Markets, an exchange and brokerage platform which recently received approval to trade in the UAE as a broker-dealer. A report by Nikkei Asia last month outlined that Standard Chartered is very much making a concerted effort to muscle its way into the Asian crypto space.Speaking at RippleSwell, an event held in Dubai earlier this week organized by blockchain company Ripple Labs, Zodia Custody CEO Julian Sawyer stated:“Blockchain is the future, tokenization is the future. It’s a question of how we get there and what speed we do that.”Building out a regional hubThis recent partnership comes as the UAE works towards strengthening its position as a fintech hub, leveraging improved infrastructure and a local talent base. Despite its roots in the UAE, the joint venture aims to explore opportunities within the global digital asset ecosystem. Manson highlighted the commitment to broader exploration beyond the local market, indicating a global perspective in navigating emerging opportunities.This development follows Standard Chartered’s earlier memorandum of understanding with the Dubai International Financial Centre in May. This agreement granted the bank approval to extend digital asset custody services to institutional clients on a global scale.While deeply entrenched in the crypto custody business, Standard Chartered is also actively engaging with the digital economy’s broader facets. In June, the bank partnered with PricewaterhouseCoopers China to produce a white paper on applications for central bank digital currency in the Greater Bay Area of China, encompassing Guangdong province, Hong Kong and Macao.Both SBI and Standard Chartered are collaborating with the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) in a project that seeks to build a comprehensive framework for the provision of interoperable and open networks for tokenized digital assets.This multifaceted approach positions Standard Chartered as a key player navigating the dynamic intersection of traditional finance and the evolving digital landscape. Market reaction to this recent development has been positive with one crypto sector participant stating:”Excited to see Standard Chartered expanding its services to accommodate the growing demand for crypto custody, especially in the UAE where the regulatory environment appears to be more favorable. This move could pave the way for increased institutional adoption of Bitcoin and Ethereum.”