Singapore Prime Minister issues warning on AI-generated crypto scam

Recent developments relative to governance of the CRO token, a native token belonging to the Cronos blockchain, have proven controversial, with many in the community unhappy with the actions of Singapore-headquartered Crypto.com.Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashProposal controversyThe controversy surrounds a proposal put forward by Crypto.com, which originally developed the Cronos blockchain in 2021, to mint 70 billion CRO tokens. The move would effectively roll back a CRO token burn that took place in 2021. The governance process applicable to the proposal meant that CRO token holders could vote on the proposal between March 2 and March 16. For the majority of that voting period, the outcome appeared to be uncertain. The “yes” vote had a narrow lead, but it would have been insufficient to reach the required 33.4% quorum of eligible votes. Exceeding the quorumHowever, at 14:00 UTC on Sunday, a last-minute influx of 3.35 billion tokens tipped the balance firmly in favor of the proposal while well exceeding the minimum turnout as 70.18% of eligible votes were cast. 61.18% voted in favor, with 17.61% against. Many CRO token holders who opposed the proposal are aggrieved at the manner in which this late voting surge came about. It’s understood that these last-minute votes came from blockchain validators controlled by Crypto.com. Crypto.com is understood to hold in the region of 80% of the voting power. In exercising that voting clout, many CRO holders feel that it has undermined the will of the community. Some commentators believe that increasing the token supply will result in a loss of trust in the project, damaging investor confidence going forward. Earlier this month, Crypto.com CEO Kris Marszalek responded to community pushback against the proposal. Marszalek suggested that the proposal ties in with an overall strategy for the success of the Cronos blockchain and its CRO token in the long term.  He pointed to four items that are relevant in achieving success for an altcoin like CRO. These included finding product-market fit, the need to redeploy free cashflows, successfully launching exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and participating in reserve-building initiatives.  ‘Free to vote and free to sell’The strategy relies upon building demand in order to achieve longer-term success. On X, Marszalek wrote: “People who do not agree that this is the right approach are free to vote & free to sell. We will stay laser focused on building towards new ATHs [all-time-highs].” In another X post on March 19, the Crypto.com CEO outlined that the company generated $1.5 billion in revenue in 2024 while servicing the needs of 140 million users on the platform. The company spent $700 million on branding, user acquisition and user incentives in 2024. Its operations turned a net profit of $300 million.  Crypto.com has also made further headway on the compliance front over the course of the past week. The company received licensing approval in Dubai to offer derivatives from the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA). On March 17 the company announced that it had successfully achieved Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) registration with the Argentine regulator.

Korean Securities Firms Unite to Build Shared Security Token InfrastructureShinhan Securities, KB Securities, and NH Investment and Securities are gearing up to sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) later this month to establish a security token consortium, according to South Korean news outlet MoneyToday.Photo by Louie Nicolo Nimor on UnsplashShared infrastructureThe primary objective of this consortium is to create a shared infrastructure for their security token operations. This initiative marks the first instance where the nation’s major securities firms are getting together to set up a security token consortium. Until now, securities companies have typically sought collaborations with banks, fractional investment firms, or blockchain technology companies, showing reluctance to cooperate with their direct competitors over concerns of potential loss of competitiveness.An expert within the securities industry underscored the paramount importance of securing control over the infrastructure, particularly given that the security token market has not materialized. The expert further stated that once a collaborative network is built among the leading securities firms, it is likely to set the standards for the entire market. Meanwhile, the precise details of the plan have not yet been finalized.Challenges in prior initiativesSince the South Korean Financial Services Commission revealed the security token guidelines in February, the securities sector has been deliberating the creation of a shared network that would be accessible to all industry participants. This kind of system is considered ideal as it facilitates flexible expansion and cost efficiency. However, the discussion came to a halt due to conflicts between the Korea Securities Depository, the Korea Financial Investment Association, and fintech firm Koscom.Meanwhile, installing an independent network is not very feasible, given that it not only incurs significant costs upfront but also has limited potential for expansion. This is why these industry leaders devised an alternative strategy in which they can collectively share the financial burden. In addition, Shinhan, KB, and NH plan to explore joint business models with the aim of maximizing the utility of their security token infrastructure.

Binance Takes P2P Service Measures in Response to Sanctioned Russian BanksGlobal crypto exchange Binance has removed the option for users to conduct transactions via sanctioned Russian banks on its peer-to-peer (P2P) platform, a decision that comes on the heels of a Wall Street Journal exposé published earlier this week, shedding light on the platform’s involvement in facilitating the movement of funds for Russian users.Previously, Binance’s peer-to-peer service featured five Russian banks under sanctions as a method for ruble transfers between users. However, the company swiftly acted to address potential compliance concerns. Fittingly, this latest news was also broken by the Wall Street Journal on Friday.Dmitry Sidorov on PexelsSailing too close to the windWhen approached regarding the omission of these banks, a Binance spokesperson stated: “We regularly update our systems to ensure compliance with local and global regulatory standards. When gaps are pointed out to us, we seek to address and remediate them as soon as possible.”The Wall Street Journal’s article outlined how Binance’s peer-to-peer platform facilitated ruble-to-crypto trades that frequently involved the sanctioned Russian banks, with Rosbank and Tinkoff Bank being prominent examples.These trades often utilized layers of intermediaries to convert funds from these banks into Binance balances, as detailed by various company resources, user screenshots, and messages in official chat groups. Despite these revelations, Binance’s exchange had continued to handle significant volumes of ruble trading, according to data compiled by digital asset research firm CCData.US DoJ probeBinance’s activities in Russia could potentially contribute to its ongoing legal challenges in the United States. The US Justice Department (DoJ) has been probing the company’s actions for potential violations of American sanctions on Russia. In response to such concerns, the Binance spokesperson emphasized:“Binance aims to diligently comply with the global sanctions rules and enforces sanctions on people, organizations, entities, and countries that have been blacklisted by the international community, denying such actors access to the Binance platform.”WorkaroundsTraders, however, had reportedly found workarounds to the bank removals, as observed in the official Telegram chat group for Russian clients. Many shared that they could still engage with sanctioned banks by selecting alternative payment methods and then manually inputting their Rosbank or Tinkoff bank details.Earlier this year, an investigative report by CNBC alleged that employees of the company had told it that Binance staff regularly helped Chinese customers to bypass Know Your Customer (KYC) controls in order to access the platform. More recently, another report, once again by the Wall Street Journal, found that business in China was booming, which surprised many given that China banned crypto trading within the country in 2021.It’s apparent that the company is reacting to regulatory and legal pressures in taking the decision to make these changes to its P2P service. Perennial crypto critic US Senator Elizabeth Warren took to X (formerly Twitter) on Friday, stating:“I rang the alarm about sanctions evasion by Russia using the crypto platform Binance — and urged [the DoJ] to investigate potentially false statements it made to Congress. We need stronger crypto regulations to rein in illicit finance.“