Animoca founder: $200T crypto market within 10 years

Global crypto exchange Binance has carried out a survey which reveals that the security habits of Asian platform users are evolving positively.Photo by Vadim Artyukhin on UnsplashUsers responding to more sophisticated scamsIn a blog post published by the crypto exchange platform on May 6, Binance revealed that it had carried out a survey of nearly 30,000 platform users across Asia. The company’s takeaway following analysis of the survey data is that “scams are evolving — and so are crypto users.” The firm suggested that users are “stepping up their security game,” with exchanges facing growing demand from their users for real-time protection and smarter security tools. Increasing use of 2FAThe exchange platform found that 80.5% of survey respondents now use Binance two-factor authentication (2FA). While the use of 2FA is definitely a move in the right direction, it doesn’t guarantee the safety of a user’s digital assets.  In an article published by Forbes last month Forbes Contributor Davey Winder warned that infostealer malware can compromise 2FA codes in as little as 10 seconds. In June of last year, an OKX user lost $2 million in crypto to a hacker who utilized AI despite the victim having used Google’s 2FA. Double-checking transfersThe survey found that 73.3% of users double-check transfers before sending digital assets. Due to the nature of decentralized cryptocurrency, crypto transactions are not easily reversed and are usually irreversible. That puts a greater responsibility on crypto users to ensure that they are sending funds to the appropriate wallet address. Double-checking transfer addresses is not only necessary due to human error. Malware is also used by hackers to spoof such addresses, tricking the sender into sending the digital assets to their address rather than the one that was originally intended. It emerged in May 2024 that a Bitcoin trader had lost more than $70 million in Bitcoin in an “address poisoning” scam. Binance itself had warned users last September that “clipper malware,” which intercepts clipboard data on a user’s phone or desktop, replacing copied wallet addresses with alternative addresses under the hacker’s control, is increasingly being employed in hacking attempts. While the survey has revealed a positive evolution in the security habits of Asian platform users, there’s still room for further improvement. Just 17.6% of survey respondents utilize address whitelisting, a measure that restricts account user access to a safe list of pre-defined trusted addresses. Only 21.5% of survey respondents use anti-phishing codes as a security mechanism. The objective of phishing is to steal data, install malware on a user’s device or otherwise gain account access. An anti-phishing code aids the user in verifying the authenticity of emails and texts from a specific service. Security remains a major issue within crypto. Last month, hackers employed social engineering tactics to steal $330 million in Bitcoin from an elderly American victim. Exchange platforms themselves continue to struggle to safeguard user funds. Earlier this year, Binance competitor, Dubai-headquartered Bybit, suffered a $1.5 billion hack believed to have been perpetrated by North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Lazarus is also thought to have been behind a $235 million crypto theft at Indian crypto exchange WazirX in July 2024.

Chinese financial industry groups have warned that illegal fundraising and fraud are increasingly emerging through stablecoins, airdrops, real-world asset (RWA) tokens, and crypto mining schemes, according to a Dec. 5 notice carried by the state-run Xinhua News Agency.Photo by Othman Alghanmi on UnsplashThe joint warning was issued by seven major bodies: the National Internet Finance Association of China, the China Banking Association, the Securities Association of China, the Asset Management Association of China, the China Futures Association, the China Association for Public Companies, and the Payment & Clearing Association of China. These groups stated that such products are being used to drive speculative trading, pyramid schemes, and other illicit activities that threaten financial stability. They stressed that cryptocurrencies are not legal tender in China and do not share the legal status of fiat currency, further noting that regulators have not approved any RWA tokenization activities. Crypto and RWA offerings prohibitedConsequently, the notice bars member institutions from directly or indirectly providing services related to the issuance or trading of cryptocurrencies or RWA tokens. The associations also urged members to intensify risk warnings and investor education, while encouraging the public to report suspected violations. This industry alert follows the central bank’s recent reiteration of its concerns regarding speculative crypto activity. According to Reuters, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) last month restated its ban on crypto-related business, citing a resurgence in speculation and compliance gaps in stablecoins that complicate risk management. The central bank plans to tighten enforcement against unlawful operations, reinforcing the blanket ban on crypto transactions and mining imposed in September 2021. Old Bitcoin loan feud resurfacesDespite this restrictive framework, disputes tied to legacy crypto dealings continue to surface. Cryptopolitan reported that a long-running controversy has re-emerged surrounding Li Feng, a co-founder of Moore Threads, a Chinese GPU designer widely viewed as a homegrown rival to Nvidia. According to Cryptopolitan, the scrutiny follows the company's Dec. 5 debut on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, where it raised 8 billion yuan ($1.1 billion). Reportedly, Li faces accusations of failing to repay 1,500 Bitcoin allegedly borrowed from OKX founder Xu Mingxing. Citing a Foresight News post referenced by analyst AB Kuai.Dong on X, the report indicates that Li and angel investor Xue Manzi launched a cryptocurrency in 2017, raising 5,000 ETH. According to the outlet, Li has been accused of failing to repay 1,500 Bitcoin that he purportedly borrowed from OKX founder Xu Mingxing. Xu is said to have raised the issue publicly and sought resolution through legal proceedings in both China and the U.S. However, the legal ambiguity surrounding cryptocurrencies at the time was viewed as a major obstacle to settlement. Li, for his part, has characterized Xu’s contribution as a failed investment. The situation took a constructive turn when Xu reposted AB Kuai.Dong’s post, saying observers should look past old disputes. Xu encouraged a focus on constructive industry growth and stated that debt matters should be left to legal channels, offering goodwill toward fellow entrepreneurs. The timing of the renewed dispute alongside recent industry warnings highlights a consistent focus on risk control and legal clarity within China’s digital asset space. Authorities continue to emphasize investor protection and formal reporting channels to curb speculation, while market participants are increasingly turning to legal avenues to resolve legacy issues. These developments point to a sector still wrestling with unresolved disputes and regulatory gaps, underscoring the need for clearer rules for both regulators and entrepreneurs. 

Bank of Korea Anticipated to Conduct Retail CBDC Pilot TestThe Bank of Korea (BOK), the South Korean central bank, is reportedly planning to conduct a pilot test for distributing retail central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) to the general public via commercial banks, according to a report by local news outlet IT Chosun.Photo by Zequn Gui on UnsplashBOK’s CBDC initiativesIn 2020, the BOK initiated a pilot test for CBDC issuance, establishing a platform for both online and offline payments. Last month, the BOK announced the successful completion of a CBDC simulation to ensure connectivity with commercial banks.A representative from a commercial bank stated that the BOK would recruit banks next month for a retail CBDC experiment. The pilot test for this retail CBDC is projected to take place next year.Wholesale and retailThe upcoming CBDC pilot test aims to cater to the retail needs of ordinary citizens. There are two types of CBDCs: wholesale CBDCs, which facilitate payments between financial institutions, and retail CBDCs, which are accessible to all economic entities, including the general public.The successful execution of the retail CBDC pilot test requires close collaboration between the BOK and commercial banks. A banking official highlighted that while the BOK can outline the distribution framework for wholesale CBDCs, it may not be the most suitable entity to design the intricate distribution scheme for retail CBDCs.Last year, 15 financial institutions, including five commercial banks (KB Kookmin Bank, Shinhan Bank, Hana Bank, Woori Bank, and NongHyup Bank), participated in an inter-institutional CBDC linkage experiment with the BOK. The BOK is expected to select banks from among these participants to design the distribution structure of retail CBDCs and proceed with a pilot test.Speculative timelineAn official from a commercial bank that took part in the BOK’s prior experiment said that the Korean central bank has recently maintained close communication with commercial banks and successfully completed the infrastructure linkage test for CBDCs. The official also mentioned that the retail CBDC test is expected to see its completion this year, potentially enabling the commencement of retail CBDC implementations in the private sector next year.However, a BOK official expressed a more cautious stance. The official stated that the BOK has recently expanded its digital currency research team and plans to conduct further research in the future. Specific timelines and plans for the retail CBDC test could not be disclosed at this time.Other countriesDifferent countries have adopted varying approaches to CBDC research and implementation, depending on their economic conditions. Developing nations have been promoting CBDC issuance to facilitate financial inclusion, while developed countries have prioritized the stability of their financial systems.However, as cash payments decline and private digital currencies continue to proliferate, developed countries are also turning their attention to retail CBDCs. For instance, the Bank of England collaborated with the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) to establish and experiment with retail CBDC prototype infrastructure. Similarly, the European Union (EU) has released draft legislation to introduce the digital euro as a legal tender within the Eurozone.