Circle moves towards further APAC expansion via MHC Digital partnership

Tether, the issuer of the USDT stablecoin, has teamed up with local partners in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in order to launch a dirham (AED)-backed stablecoin. In a statement published to the firm’s website on Aug. 21, Tether outlined that the stablecoin is being launched in partnership with Dubai-based technology conglomerate Phoenix Group and Green Acorn Investments, a company that describes itself as “a socially responsible investment firm dedicated to supporting critical sectors and supporting the generation of sustainable wealth and financial literacy.”Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashFully backed by AED reservesThe stablecoin issuer outlined that each token will be “fully backed by liquid UAE-based reserves.” Tether further maintained that the back-end management of the new token will adhere to the firm’s “transparent and robust reserve standards,” and that “every Dirham-pegged token is tied to the value of the AED, providing stability and confidence in its value.”  Tether dominates the stablecoin market where USDT accounts for $117 billion, against a backdrop of an overall stablecoin market valued at $169 billion.  Perennial skepticsThe company has perennially faced criticism for a lack of transparency relative to the backing of its USDT stablecoin, given its policy of providing attestation reports instead of fully comprehensive audits from a top-tier auditing firm. One of the firm’s critics, the pseudonymous X account @OccamiCrypto took to the social media platform to provide its reaction to this most recent development, stating: "This Tether UAE stablecoin 'launch' will likely be as real as Tether’s promised audit and real time reserve reporting." The Tether critic went on to claim that the announcement is nothing more than "Tether spin," and that Tether has never attempted to become regulated in any market and that nothing would come of it. Another Tether critic, freelance journalist Jacob Silverman, commented on the development on X, stating:”Russian businessmen in UAE must be rejoicing.” His comment is suggestive of a common assertion that Tether is being used to facilitate the circumvention of sanctions. According to the firm’s press release, it believes that the product will enable users locally to access the benefits of the AED in digital form. The company claims that it will “streamline international trade and remittances, reduce transaction fees, and provide a hedge against currency fluctuations, thus playing a crucial role in the financial ecosystem of the UAE and beyond.” Tether’s partner Phoenix Group has been active in the crypto-sphere in recent times through mining. In December of last year, the company sealed a $380 million deal with Chinese mining equipment manufacturer MicroBT. Earlier that month, the company went public on the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (ADX). On face value, this development appears positive. However, UAE-based crypto and blockchain lawyer Irina Heaver recently warned that tightening regulations within the UAE may shut down crypto payments within the country. Heaver specifically cited the use of USDT as being under threat, with the potential for stablecoin-based transactions to be prohibited as new rules are ushered in.  

Korea’s FSC Opposes Other Agencies’ Involvement in Virtual Asset BillAhead of the National Assembly’s passage of the virtual asset bill, the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) has repeatedly opposed the involvement of the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) in regulating cryptocurrencies, according to the Korean newspaper Kukmin Ilbo.©Pexels/LukasFSC’s oppositionIn a document submitted to the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee, the FSC opposed stipulating the BOK’s right to request documents in the virtual asset bill. The agency argued that the bill is indirectly related to the BOK’s monetary and credit policy and that explicitly mentioning monetary and credit policy in the bill could lead to the misinterpretation of virtual assets as possessing the characteristics of currencies.The FSC also objected to stipulating the FSS’s right to inspect crypto enterprises. According to law, the purpose of the FSC is to inspect and supervise financial institutions. Explicitly stating the FSS’s right to inspect crypto enterprises could cause confusion to the public that they are financial entities.However, there are growing concerns about the FSC’s perceived intention to dominate virtual asset jurisdiction.At a small meeting held under the National Policy Committee last month, Lawmaker Yoon Han-hong of the ruling People Power Party expressed the view that the FSC should consider incorporating the BOK and the FSS in the virtual asset bill for crypto regulations. During the meeting, the FSC objected to the inclusion of a stipulation that excludes central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) from the definition of virtual assets. Meanwhile, the BOK agreed to include such a stipulation.Allowing class action suitsAccording to an internal document obtained by Kukmin Ilbo, the FSC also intends to allow class action suits for crypto investors. It seeks to add cryptocurrencies to a bill proposed for class action suits, which also deal with securities. Class action suits provide a means for victims to receive redress in cases where a representative is successful in winning the lawsuit against the offender.The FSC stated that it will follow the majority on the issue of whether the purpose of the virtual asset bill should include the phrase “to contribute to the development of the nation’s economy,” although it left a cautionary note that some might raise objections to this, considering the speculative nature of virtual assets.

28 crypto service providers register with India’s FIUIn India, 28 entities providing services related to virtual digital assets (VDAs) have successfully registered with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the body responsible for combating money laundering in the world’s most populous country.Notable names in this list include Neblio Technologies, more commonly known as CoinDCX, Zanmai Labs, the company responsible for the WazirX crypto platform, Bitcipher Labs’ CoinSwitch, Nextgendev Solutions and Awlencan Innovations India’s Zebpay.Photo by Big G Media on UnsplashA need to register as ‘reporting entities’This information comes in response to a question posed in the Lok Sabha (India’s lower house of Parliament), where the government emphasized the significance of these entities complying with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). In March, the government had formally designated companies dealing in VDAs, crypto exchanges and related intermediaries as “reporting entities” under the PMLA.According to the notification, crypto exchanges and their intermediaries are obligated to conduct Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures for their clients and platform users. This includes maintaining KYC details, identity documents, account files and business correspondence records with clients.Offshore exchanges required to registerMinister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary mentioned that the registration process for VDA service providers catering to the Indian market is underway. Non-compliance with these regulations may result in appropriate action under the PMLA. It has been clarified that offshore crypto exchanges operating in India are required to adhere to these guidelines. Despite that, none of the 28 entities who have registered so far appear to be offshore companies.Commenting on the development via the X social media platform, Sumit Gupta, Co-Founder of CoinDCX, wrote:”Emphasizing compliance to PMLA is vital for the safety and financial integrity of Indians, as dealing with non-registered platforms exposes citizens to nefarious actors, putting their finances at risk.” . . . “It’s encouraging to witness the Government initiating actions against non-compliant offshore entities.”While steps to provide guidelines for the industry are largely positive, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has been vocal in its criticism of cryptocurrencies and calls for potential bans have cast a shadow over the industry in India. The recent collapse of prominent platforms like FTX have not been helpful, only serving to exacerbate concerns relative to India’s crypto ecosystem.The negative sentiment, coupled with an ongoing funding winter, has resulted in the closure of operations for some crypto platforms, including Pillow and WeTrade, this year. Firms like CoinSwitch and Gupta’s CoinDCX have had to reduce headcount in 2023 amid challenging market conditions.Despite these challenges, there are also positive signs. A recent report by blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis found that India has been the frontrunner more recently in terms of crypto adoption in Asia.This latest development provides guidelines where anti-money laundering processes are concerned for crypto firms in India. However, the government needs to follow through with a complete regulatory framework for the industry. The Indian courts recently declined to act on such a petition on the basis that it falls within the remit of the country’s legislature and is outside the purview of the courts.