PM encourages focus on crypto so Malaysia doesn’t get left behind

Victory Securities granted approval for retail crypto trading in Hong KongHong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has given the green light to Victory Securities, a well established investment firm headquartered in the Chinese autonomous territory, for retail virtual asset trading.Photo by Carlos Alberto Gómez Iñiguez on UnsplashFirst licensed corporationThe license will allow the investment firm to expand its crypto trading and advisory services to retail investors. The publicly traded company announced its crypto licensing achievement via a press release published to its website on Friday. In that statement, the company expressed the hope that “by connecting traditional finance with virtual assets, customers can configure assets in a flexible and convenient way, and [we] can provide general investors with investment advice on virtual assets and publish relevant research reports.”This approval marks Victory Securities as the first licensed corporation in Hong Kong to offer such services to the retail market, joining the ranks of already approved firms like HashKey Exchange and OSL Digital Securities. It builds upon previous licensing approval that the company received from the SFC to offer a full range of trading and advisory services in respect of virtual assets to institutional clients in November 2022.The move reflects Hong Kong’s commitment to crypto regulation, as earlier this year, the region established a framework enabling the provision of crypto services to retail clients. This development positions Hong Kong as a key player in the Asian crypto market, where firms seem to be receiving more regulatory clarity compared to their counterparts in the United States. The regulatory initiative gains significance in light of the recent JPEX scandal, involving an alleged HK$1.6 billion ($204 million) fraud.Bringing retail into cryptoVictory Securities, currently listed as an applicant on the SFC’s recently published roster of virtual asset trading firms, is navigating this regulatory landscape to bring retail investors into the crypto market. In parallel, HashKey Group, another Hong Kong-based cryptocurrency firm, has launched the city’s first SFC-approved trading app since the JPEX incident. HashKey Exchange’s app, boasting “full mobile trading capabilities,” became operational this month, a notable progression given its prior limitation to professional investors.Through HashKey’s app, local traders can now engage in bitcoin and ether transactions using funds from their Hong Kong or U.S. dollar bank accounts. In addition to pioneering retail crypto trading, HashKey has introduced its crypto over-the-counter (OTC) trading service, HashKey Brokerage, aligning with local securities regulations and the recently implemented cryptocurrency regulatory framework by the SFC.The Hong Kong regulator is also believed to be currently weighing up whether to allow retail investors the ability to access spot crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Despite these advancements, the SFC maintains restrictions on retail traders engaging in stablecoin transactions until new regulatory arrangements are established. This decision follows the SFC’s consultation paper on regulating crypto activities, emphasizing the need to address risks associated with stablecoins and their regulation.The regulator aims to ensure appropriate management of stablecoin reserves to maintain price stability and safeguard investors’ redemption rights, underscoring the potential significant implications for stablecoin stability if these risks are not effectively managed.As Hong Kong solidifies its position in the evolving crypto landscape, Victory Securities’ approval signifies yet another milestone in the region’s journey toward fostering a regulated and inclusive crypto market for retail investors.

Korean Lawmakers Complete First Rough Draft of Virtual Asset User Protection BillKorean lawmakers have completed the first rough draft of the virtual asset user protection bill at a National Policy Committee meeting held later last month.©Pexels/Matthias ZomerAgreeing on term usage ‘virtual assets’So far, 18 bills have been proposed to regulate cryptocurrencies, and the lawmakers and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) agreed to use the term “virtual assets” to encompass similar terms such as digital assets and crypto assets.Phased enactment of billsThe bills are likely to be reviewed under the title “Virtual Asset User Protection Act.” The bipartisan group agreed to enact the bills in phases, introducing the user protection bill in the first phase and the virtual asset listing and issuance bill in the second phase.Meanwhile, there were mixed opinions on the content of the bills. In particular, there was debate over whether the bills should stipulate that the central bank digital currency (CBDC) is excluded from virtual assets, and whether the bills should include a standard for determining if a virtual asset is a security.Debate over stipulating CBDC’s statusThe stipulation of excluding CBDC from virtual assets was the most divisive topic since it would lead to defining the conditions for other assets such as non-fungible tokens. Moreover, the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, which currently regulates virtual asset service providers (VASPs), does not contain any stipulation on CBDC. Some raised concerns that such discrepancies could later cause confusion. In the end, assembly members decided to discuss the matter again in April after consulting with the Bank of Korea and the Ministry of Government Legislation.Criteria for classifying virtual assets as securitiesRegarding whether to include criteria for classifying virtual assets as securities, the lawmakers and financial regulators took different sides.Lee Yong-woo, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, underlined that a clear statement of the relationship between the issuer and the recipient of virtual assets in a whitepaper can determine their security status. He added that such provisions should be included in the bills.Park Min-woo, an FSC official, on the other hand, commented on a cautious note that in case virtual assets fall under the category of securities, they may not be applicable to the virtual asset act. He explained that VASPs might deal with both securities and virtual assets, and in such cases, there could be a misunderstanding that VASPs are not subject to the virtual asset act simply because they trade securities.

Further Trials Required Before Determination of eHKD Launch DateThe Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is taking a cautious approach to the launch of its retail central bank digital currency (CBDC), the e-HKD, stating that it will only go live once key stakeholders have gained sufficient experience to compete effectively in the payment sector.Photo by Jimmy Chan on PexelsAwaiting greater clarityIn an interview with the South China Morning Post (SCMP) earlier this week, Eddie Yue, CEO of the HKMA, revealed that initial experiments with e-HKD have shown promise, but the central bank is still waiting for greater clarity on technological, legal, and societal aspects. The CBDC trial began in May, involving 16 commercial banks, payment providers, and gross settlement platform Ripple, with a focus on exploring various use cases.Yue emphasized that they are still in the early stages of the trial process. The central question remains finding a use case that outperforms current retail payment methods in terms of safety, speed, or convenience.Programmable paymentsAmong the use cases explored in the pilot, programmable payments have stood out. This functionality allows consumer funds to be restricted for specific purposes. Bank of China (Hong Kong) has been at the forefront of this study, allowing select users to make payments using the test CBDC.The potential applications of the CBDC extend to tokenized deposits and tokenized assets, the aspect of the project which Ripple has involved itself with. The HKMA has shown interest in tokenization, especially after the successful completion of Project Evergreen, a blockchain-based bond issuance project.While the domestic use of the CBDC faces challenges, the HKMA is actively considering its role in cross-border payments. The HKMA has been involved in the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) mBridge pilot, which is expected to release a minimum viable product (MVP) by 2024. It’s working alongside the Bank of Thailand and the central bank of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) on that project. Hong Kong and the UAE have been working towards strengthening financial cooperation in respect of crypto regulation.Following the achievements of the initial pilot, the HKMA is open to bringing in new participants. Rumors suggest that up to 20 central banks are closely monitoring the project’s developments.Collaboration with mainland ChinaRecent weeks have seen Hong Kong and China working on improving cross-border transactions. In July, it was announced that Chinese tourists visiting Hong Kong would be able to use their digital yuan wallets to pay for goods and services at select locations.Conversely, Hong Kong tourists visiting mainland China could use the digital yuan for retail transactions. A new upgrade will enable tourists to top up their digital yuan wallets using Hong Kong’s Faster Payment System (FPS) or major payment providers like Mastercard and Visa.While the exact launch date for e-HKD remains uncertain, the focus on practical use cases and technological advancements is expected to yield a robust and innovative CBDC for Hong Kong’s future. On the international front, the mBridge project is set to play a pivotal role in the broader adoption of CBDCs across borders, potentially revolutionizing global payment systems.