Amber Group Targets Trust in Web3 Via Thoughtworks Partnership

Korea considers legal recognition of virtual assets as trust assets for investor protectionSouth Korea’s Ministry of Justice (MOJ) is assessing whether customers’ virtual assets on cryptocurrency exchanges should be legally recognized as trust assets. This classification would give users priority in claiming their virtual assets in case of an exchange’s bankruptcy, thus strengthening investor protection. There’s a noted concern about potential disputes in such bankruptcy situations, as users’ digital assets are typically considered to be in the custody or storage of these platforms.Photo by Daniel Bernard on UnsplashLegal study by Seoul National UniversityAccording to a Tuesday report by local news outlet ChosunBiz, citing industry and legal sources, the MOJ has initiated a legal study on this subject. The research is being conducted by the Seoul National University R&DB Foundation, which started the project earlier this month.Through this study, the MOJ is expected to examine the legal classification of cryptocurrency as property. This review is significant because, for cryptocurrencies to be held in a trust, they must be legally recognized as property. Meanwhile, the upcoming Virtual Asset User Protection Act, set to come into effect next July, mandates that only cash deposits made by users be segregated from the assets of the exchange itself.In Korea, under the current provisions of the Capital Markets Act, virtual assets are not recognized as being held in a trust. Instead, staked cryptocurrencies are seen as being under custodial management or storage. In such arrangements, only a debtor-creditor relationship concerning virtual assets is acknowledged, differing from the legal framework of a trust.Prioritization of rightsIf a cryptocurrency exchange becomes insolvent and enters liquidation, the current legal framework could end up prioritizing the rights of the exchange’s creditors or shareholders over those of the crypto investors. This situation has faced criticism for its inadequate protection of investors. However, if the crypto assets were considered to be held in trusts, it would enable users to acquire “rights to foreclose outside bankruptcy.” This means users would have the right to receive priority reimbursement for their crypto assets, offering them a higher level of protection in the event of an exchange’s bankruptcy.Regarding this development, an official from the MOJ said that while the study is a fundamental legal review focused on exploring ways to protect users through the application of trusts for various cryptocurrency transactions, including those involving decentralized finance (DeFi), it is too early to provide specific details at this stage.

The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), an independent statutory body that regulates Hong Kong’s securities and futures markets, has alerted investors to 33 suspicious websites which appear to be masquerading as HashKey, one of the Chinese autonomous territory’s first licensed virtual asset exchanges.Photo by Dan Freeman on UnsplashAlert listThe regulator flagged the websites by publishing their domain names to its alert list. Hong Kong’s SFC first published its alert list relative to suspicious crypto-related entities in November 2021. In terms of both suspicious trading platforms and suspicious crypto-related web links, the regulator has found 91 instances to date. Remarks added to the listing confirm that a HashKey company, Hash Blockchain Limited, had reported the websites to the regulator as fraudulent websites. The web domain links have been slightly modified when compared to official links to the HashKey website, in an effort to mislead HashKey customers. A little less than two weeks ago, HashKey published a statement to its website, making service users aware of the fraudulent links and websites. It stated: “Fraudulent websites will appear under different domain names or with slight modifications or variations of the official HashKey Exchange website address www.hashkey.com by adding a combination of letters, numbers or symbols.” The company added that it has no connection with these websites, that no affiliation exists with HashKey Exchange, and consequently the company doesn’t accept any liability for any matters relating to these fraudulent websites and links. As well as the regulator, HashKey has also reported the matter to the Hong Kong Police Force. Tackling crypto-related fraudBoth law enforcement and regulators in Hong Kong have been more proactive in tackling any signs of crypto-related fraud or potential scams following an episode of fraud involving an unlicensed Dubai-headquartered crypto exchange, JPEX, in 2023. At that time, the authorities within the Chinese autonomous territory received in excess of 2,369 complaints from Hong Kong residents who had been duped by the unregulated exchange. Overall, victims were out of pocket to the tune of $166 million. Some commentators had likened the JPEX scandal as being an “FTX moment” for Hong Kong, referring to the high profile collapse of Bahamas-headquartered crypto exchange FTX in November 2022. However, Hong Kong investors also suffered as a result of the FTX collapse.  In fact, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) and the SFC were listed as FTX creditors in 2023. The statutory bodies appeared on the FTX creditor list alongside 50 Hong Kong institutions. Towards the end of 2023, the agency issued a public warning regarding HongKongDAO and BitCuped, entities that were accused of misinformation. In February 2024, the SFC issued a reminder to investors within the Chinese autonomous territory to ensure that they’re only engaging with licensed cryptocurrency platforms. To date, the regulator has awarded crypto trading licenses to seven virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs). Earlier this month, the regulator extended use of its swift licensing process to all new applicants in an effort to fast-track the approval of more licensed platforms.

Daehong and Animoca Brands Partner to Leverage NFTs in Expanding Web3 ProjectsDaehong Communications, the marketing solutions arm of South Korean industrial conglomerate Lotte Group, has recently inked a partnership with Animoca Brands, a blockchain gaming company headquartered in Hong Kong.Animoca Brands gained attention earlier this year by raising $5.5 million through the sale of its Mocaverse NFTs. Mocaverse is the membership NFT collection for the Animoca Brands ecosystem. The Hong Kong-based publisher is also the owner of the renowned metaverse gaming platform, The Sandbox.Photo by Shubham’s Web3 on UnsplashConnecting two worlds of NFTsThis collaboration between Daehong Communications and Animoca Brands is intended to expand their respective Web3 projects, focusing on domains like games, communities, and tickets. As a move under this collaboration, Daehong’s Bellygom and Bellyland NFTs will see integration with Mocaverse. Daehong oversees the Bellygom NFT project, while the pink bear character of the project is a promotional tool for Lotte Homeshopping, a media commerce arm of Lotte Group.Moreover, holders of Mocaverse NFTs are set to experience a variety of games, missions, and rewarding systems introduced by Bellyland — Daehong’s second collection of the Bellygom NFT project.Bellygom’s expansion effortsIn recent times, Daehong has been actively driving the growth of the Bellygom NFT project by revealing the project’s details on GitBook in both Korean and English. Furthermore, Daehong has forged alliances with several burgeoning Web3 projects, including decentralized wellness ecosystem Yogapetz, Web3 social media platform Phaver, and Web3 social network CyberConnect.This partnership marks a strategic confluence of marketing solutions and blockchain gaming, aiming to spearhead innovations in a variety of Web3 projects, especially those related to gaming and community building. These efforts are poised to contribute to broadening the horizon of decentralized technologies.