Hong Kong’s SFC flags suspect platforms disguised as HashKey

Hong Kong Bank to Act as Settlement Bank for Crypto FirmsZA Bank, Hong Kong’s largest virtual bank, is looking to become the go-to bank for crypto startups. The online bank has been given permission to serve as the settlement bank for regulated Web3 companies in the city. This development was announced at Hong Kong’s Web3 Festival, an event supported by the local government and attended by crypto startups and institutions from across Asia.©Pexels/Frank BarningHashKey and OSL collaborationZA Bank is expected to facilitate crypto-fiat conversions with two licensed exchanges in Hong Kong, HashKey and OSL, where customers can swap crypto into fiat currencies. ZA Bank will also offer basic banking services to local Web3 startups, a category that is currently underserved by traditional financial institutions.ZA Bank is focusing on assisting local Web3 startups and small-medium enterprises (SMEs).The bank linked up to the city’s company registry data, allowing for minimal information input and cross-checking. According to Devon Sin, alternate chief executive of ZA Bank, the bank currently conducts AML scrutiny against the usual checklists to satisfy the regulatory requirements. No AML issues have emerged during the recent months of work.Competing for global crypto businessHong Kong is trying to establish itself as a crypto-friendly alternative to other hubs, such as the US and Singapore, and a sandbox for Web3 businesses from China, where crypto trading is illegal. The city is revamping its digital assets regulatory framework, with plans to legalize retail trading of major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether. Ronald Lu, CEO of ZA Bank, said that ZA Bank’s online account opening for Web3 startups is a major step forward in integrating traditional banking services with the Web3 world.According to Lu, ZA Bank will act as a settlement bank for clients to allow withdrawals in Hong Kong, China, and US currencies after they deposit crypto tokens with exchanges. The business model is already operational through HashKey and OSL, the only two licensed crypto exchanges in Hong Kong. The bank will provide the same service for other exchanges as they become licensed.HK China’s crypto “trial run”Hong Kong is opening up to the beleaguered sector in a move that aims to revive its status as a financial center following years of COVID restrictions and political upheaval. However, access to banking has been a major hurdle for the city’s ambitions. The city’s banking and securities regulators are hosting a round-table for crypto players and bankers to share experiences and perspectives on banking services later this month.Many have speculated about a softening stance on cryptocurrency by the Chinese authorities. However, it’s more likely that they continue with strict regulation and control relative to crypto in mainland China while happy to monitor a more open approach to it within Hong Kong. Crypto analyst Myles Deutscher likens the approach to a “trial run” that is being monitored by China.Launched in March 2020, ZA Bank is one of Hong Kong’s eight licensed virtual banks and had the most net assets as of last year, despite remaining unprofitable. The virtual lender doesn’t expect it will need to boost its headcount to handle the crypto client push. Although the revenue model is still unclear, Lu said that more clients, more deposits, and more business opportunities are always great for the bank. The lender doesn’t offer services for clients from mainland China, given the restrictions in place there.

Yuichiro Tamaki, leader of Japan’s Democratic Party for the People (DPP), has outlined that if elected the party will introduce a crypto tax plan that will bring about the lowering of taxation on crypto gains to 20%. Tamaki’s comments come ahead of the Asian nation's elections, which are due to be held on Oct. 27. Taking to the X social media platform on Oct. 19, Tamaki wrote: “If you think crypto assets should be taxed separately at 20% instead of treated as miscellaneous income, please vote for the Democratic Party for the People. There will be no tax when exchanging crypto assets with other crypto assets.”Photo by Liger Pham on PexelsCrypto taxation reformThe DPP leader added that he would be appreciative of people spreading the word and letting the broader Japanese public know about this commitment that is being made in respect of crypto taxation reform. The reduction to 20% would bring the treatment of crypto in line with that of the stock market in Japan, where gains are already taxed at the 20% tax rate. The DPP leader included a graphic within his X post that provided further detail. It outlined that a loss carry-forward deduction could be applied by the taxpayer within a three-year timeframe.  A tax exemption would apply when it comes to the exchange of crypto assets. The DPP is also in favor of increasing the permitted leverage multiple from 2x to 10x relative to crypto trading. Finally, the party supports the introduction of spot crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in Japan. Focusing on developing Web3In response to an X user, Tamaki claimed that the DPP would consider a reduced taxation policy to be inclusive of other financial income in the future. However, for right now, the DPP leader said that the focus was on making Japan “a strong nation in the Web3 business.” Another Japanese crypto community member suggested that the proposed tax cut would lead to an increase in tax revenues, based upon the assertion that many people don’t file tax returns simply because tax calculations are too difficult right now. While the plan is positive for Japan’s crypto community, the DPP is unlikely to be in a position to implement such a plan. The party currently holds just seven of the 465 seats in the National Diet, the Asian nation’s House of Representatives.  Tax reform guidelinesCurrently, the applicable tax rate applied to crypto revenues can reach as high as 55% in Japan. At the end of August Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) unveiled new tax reform guidelines for 2025. One component of those proposals was the suggestion that the crypto tax rate should be reduced to 20%. With that, if Tamaki’s DPP can’t influence matters, the regulator’s proposals may be of sufficient weight to have the matter addressed. The approach taken to the taxation of crypto in various jurisdictions is having a bearing in terms of the competitiveness of those locations relative to the development and further roll-out of Web3 technologies. Earlier this month, the United Arab Emirates took a positive step forward by exempting crypto from value-added tax (VAT). Meanwhile, in Indonesia the local regulator is moving towards a re-evaluation of what is considered to be a harsh taxation policy relative to crypto. 

Lee Bok-hyun, the governor of South Korea’s Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), is set to have a meeting with Gary Gensler, the chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in May. The purpose of their meeting is to discuss whether to classify non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as virtual assets. Currently, NFTs are not seen as virtual assets in Korea, but there is a high likelihood of them being acknowledged as such following the meeting in May, local financial media outlet Edaily reported.Photo by Andrey Metelev on UnsplashLack of definition for NFTsAn NFT is a digital certificate of authenticity that is not fungible or replicable. NFTs tokenize content or assets of various types – from images, music, videos, games and artworks to real-estates – by assigning a unique token ID to them. Many see 2018 as the year NFT technology was first introduced.  Despite its wide range of applications, no legal definition has been made for NFTs. Some view NFTs as technology, and others as virtual assets or securities. The Korean government decided not to recognize NFTs as virtual assets under the Virtual Asset Protection Act (Virtual Asset Act), effective in July. Behind this decision is a perception that NFTs are less likely to pose significant risks to the market, as a large portion of NFTs are now traded by collectors seeking to expand their private collections.  However, NFTs are increasingly seen as speculative destinations by many investors over time, as prices of virtual assets including BTC surge. This shift backs the local movement to recognize NFTs as well as spot bitcoin ETFs as virtual assets. Opposition from NFT businessesBlockchain industry insiders say defining NFTs is of utmost importance, noting that classifying NFTs as virtual assets headfirst could deal a heavy blow to businesses in this sector. One finance insider mentioned that defining NFTs comes down to understanding their purposes and how they are utilized. If NFTs are primarily used for speculative purposes or as currency, they could be recognized as virtual assets, the person said.  The biggest resistance is coming from NFT-related businesses. That is because recognizing NFTs as virtual assets would require these businesses to obtain a virtual asset service provider (VASP) license from the financial authority, which takes significant costs and workforce in the process. A CEO of a blockchain startup, who preferred to remain anonymous, expressed concerns about the possibility of NFTs becoming virtual assets, saying that such recognition would enable NFT transaction tracing, potentially leading to severe violations of human rights. While many industry insiders expect that the financial authorities will bring NFTs under the forthcoming Virtual Asset Act, the FSS stated that no decisions have been made regarding details of the upcoming meeting with the U.S. SEC.