OKX Strengthens Partnership with Manchester City Football Club

The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) announced plans to conduct on-site inspections of local virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs) that are still in the process of regulatory applications after the June 1 licensing deadline. The SFC has emphasized that starting from June, all local crypto trading platforms must either possess a license or be deemed-to-be-licensed to operate legally. Operating an unlicensed VATP post-deadline will be considered a criminal offense, with the SFC actively pursuing compliance.Photo by farfar on UnsplashFocus on compliance and market adjustmentsThe inspections aim to ensure adherence to regulatory standards, particularly in safeguarding client assets and executing Know Your Customer (KYC) processes. The SFC has advised investors to only engage with licensed platforms and cautioned unlicensed companies against marketing their services or accepting new retail clients. Amidst these regulatory changes, the number of license-seeking crypto exchanges has declined. Notably, 11 firms, including OKX and Huobi's local branch, have retracted their licensing applications, leaving 18 still pending. Meanwhile, Gate.HK has halted certain operations in anticipation of meeting the new regulatory demands. To date, only two companies, OSL Digital Securities Limited and Hash Blockchain Limited, have secured a license to operate under the new framework in Hong Kong. 

Dispute Embroils Bitget in Legal Battle With Crypto InfluencerBitget, the crypto exchange registered in Seychelles, finds itself entangled in a legal dispute with prominent crypto influencer Evan Luthra.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashAccount freezing allegationsThe conflict stems from Luthra’s allegations of account freezing and loss of funds after a token listing incident in March. Luthra has filed a lawsuit against Bitget, accusing the exchange of withholding $200,000 in Tether (USDT) without adequate explanation, while also freezing his account.The legal drama follows Luthra’s involvement with the Reel Star project, where he served as an advisor for the platform which is aimed at creators. As compensation for his collaboration with the project, Luthra received Reel Token (REELT), the project’s utility token.Bitget alleged market manipulationUpon the listing of REELT tokens, Luthra reportedly sold 1.3 million tokens on Bitget. In response, Bitget claims it faced a manipulative attack orchestrated by a group of traders attempting to profit from market manipulation immediately after the token’s listing. This allegedly caused a significant drop in the token’s price, prompting Bitget’s decision to freeze Luthra’s account.Bitget states that it contacted Luthra seeking an explanation for the suspicious trading behavior. Luthra acknowledged the token sale but failed to provide satisfactory reasons for his actions, according to Bitget’s version of events. The exchange maintains that user protection is its foremost priority and that it takes swift action against illegal or fraudulent behaviors.$16 million damages claimLuthra refutes the allegations, asserting his innocence and citing alleged approval from Reel Star’s Co-Founder Navdeep Sharma for his token sale plans. He seeks a substantial $16 million in damages, in addition to the frozen funds. Luthra claims that Bitget unjustly deprived him of his tokens, asserting his status as a fully KYCed user entitled to access his holdings.In the aftermath of the incident, Bitget conducted an investigation and offered a compensation plan for affected clients. Gracy Chen, Bitget’s Managing Director, emphasized the exchange’s commitment to user protection and its actions against illicit activities on its platform. Addressing the matter on Twitter, Chen didn’t hold back in her commentary on Luthra, stating that he “has a history of fraudulent activities,” which she says were exposed by crypto journalist CoffeeZilla.The legal dispute has ignited debates within the crypto community. Supporters of Luthra contend that his case underscores broader issues faced by users of centralized exchanges, shedding light on the need for improved user rights and protection. On the other hand, some argue that Bitget acted appropriately to safeguard its users and the market integrity.CZ brought into the disputeThe legal battle has attracted attention from influential figures in the crypto industry. Against a backdrop of a very public airing of the dispute on Twitter, in a recent tweet Luthra invited Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the CEO of Binance, to respond to Luthra’s claim that Bitget spreads rumors about other exchanges. CZ was having none of it, writing: “You should talk to them, right? We are not a regulator for other exchanges.”The case highlights the intricate challenges surrounding market manipulation and token listings within the crypto space. As it unfolds, the outcome could potentially set a precedent for similar situations involving token listings, market manipulation, and user protection.

Netmarble’s MARBLEX Secures Whitelist Approval for MBX Token in JapanSouth Korean gaming company Netmarble made an announcement today that its blockchain subsidiary, MARBLEX, has obtained whitelist approval for its governance token MBX in Japan. This marks a significant milestone for the project, opening up new opportunities for MBX’s utilization within the Japanese market.Photo by Eliobed Suarez on UnsplashCrypto listing in JapanIn Japan, crypto assets must undergo a rigorous review conducted by the Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA) before being listed on crypto exchanges. Boasting its stability and reliability, MBX has become the first token from a Korean blockchain gaming project to be added to the Japanese whitelist of crypto assets.As part of its expansion plan, MARBLEX is in discussions with Zaif to arrange the listing of the MBX token on the Japanese crypto exchange in October.Utility expansion planMoon Jun-ki, Business Division Director of MARBLEX, expressed confidence in MBX’s competitiveness as a verified token. He highlighted MARBLEX’s strategy to introduce a token burn policy and expand the token’s utility, all aimed at establishing a sustainable and transparent ecosystem.These comments from Moon point to MARBLEX’s overhaul plan for MBX tokenomics. As a key step in this initiative, the blockchain firm burned 67% of its total 1 billion MBX distribution on July 19.