Animoca Brands Expands Focus to Non-US Markets

Philippines Delays Crypto Framework PublicationThe Philippines’ financial regulator has decided to postpone the release of a legal framework for the crypto industry, originally scheduled for late 2022, despite a tumultuous year.That’s according to a report published by local news outlet, Philstar Global. In the face of numerous market failures in 2022, the Philippines’ financial regulator has opted for a cautious approach and delayed the publication of a legal framework for the crypto industry, which was initially expected to be released by the end of the same year. However, work on the guidelines is still ongoing, and there is a possibility that the results could be made public in 2023.Photo by Krisia on PexelsScrutinizing crypto failuresAccording to the chairman of the Philippines Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Emilio Aquino, the regulatory authority has adjusted its previous deadlines for introducing the crypto framework in the country. The SEC had originally planned to roll out the guidelines in 2022, but they held back in order to thoroughly study the reasons behind the collapse of the FTX exchange and ensure the protection of investors.Aquino stated that there is still a chance that the framework will be issued by the end of 2023, saying, “We haven’t closed the door. We really just have to make sure people don’t get burned.”Earlier this year, the SEC joined forces with the University of the Philippines Law Center (UPLC) to collaborate on the development of guidelines for digital assets. In January 2023, the regulator introduced the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 11765 for public comment. This act, which was signed into law in 2022, however, does not explicitly mention “crypto” or “blockchain.”The crypto industry in the Philippines has been facing increasing pressure. The country’s central bank has been urging citizens to refrain from engaging in any transactions with unregistered or foreign crypto exchanges, and the SEC has echoed these recommendations.In May 2023, the SEC identified Gemini Derivatives as an unregistered security product under national law. In the investor advisory, the Commission wrote: “The public is advised not to invest or to stop investing in the investment scheme of Gemini Trust Company, LLC.”Last month the country hosted a meeting of the Regional Consultative Group for Asia of the Financial Stability Board. That meeting, held in the Philippines' oldest city, Cebu, highlighted the risks pertaining to crypto assets.Potential for positive approachNevertheless, the Philippines remains an attractive destination for crypto enthusiasts. With its rapidly growing economy, it has emerged as one of the world’s fastest-growing markets, with over 11.6 million Filipinos owning digital assets, placing it 10th worldwide in terms of crypto adoption.In an opinion piece published by Forkast News in April, Robert De Guzman, Head of Legal Compliance at Philippines-based cryptocurrency exchange Coins.ph, outlined his view that the country is forging a positive, workable framework for crypto assets. With that, it sounds like while the delay is unwelcome, the more important factor is that the South East Asian country devises a framework that is fit for purpose relative to the innovation at hand.

India Offers Suggestions in the Development of G20 Crypto GuidelinesIndia submitted its Presidency Note on Tuesday, contributing to the global framework for cryptocurrency regulation under the auspices of the G20, a forum comprising the world’s 20 largest economies.The document aligns itself with the guidance provided by prominent entities including the Financial Stability Board (FSB), the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).Photo by Swapnil Deshpandey on UnsplashKey Summit topicMany months in advance of September’s G20 Summit in New Delhi, it was clear that crypto regulation would be a key subject for discussion. The FSB’s guidelines, released in July, offer a comprehensive framework for regulating various crypto assets, particularly stablecoins, based on existing standards and principles. These guidelines encompass crucial aspects such as governance, risk management, disclosure, supervision, and cross-border collaboration.In May, the FSB’s Regional Consultative Group for Asia met in Cebu, in the Philippines. During that meeting, the FSB highlighted the risks implicated by digital assets.Published in June, the FATF guidelines put forth a universally applicable set of rules to combat money laundering and counter the risks of terrorist financing linked to cryptocurrencies. One of the main provisions is the “travel rule,” compelling crypto service providers to share customer information when conducting fund transfers.While the IMF guidelines are expected to be unveiled in August, they will encompass a synthesis paper that offers a comprehensive roadmap for crypto regulation. This roadmap is designed to reflect input from multiple stakeholders and jurisdictions.India’s supplementary additionsAmidst endorsing these global crypto guidelines, India also proposes supplementary additions, particularly highlighting the challenges faced by developing economies in the crypto realm. The document underlines that these nations may grapple with capacity and resource constraints when implementing effective crypto regulation and supervision.Furthermore, they might require more extensive access to reliable data regarding crypto activities and associated risks. Developing economies are also at a heightened risk of falling victim to illicit crypto use, including money laundering, tax evasion, and cyber-crime.In light of these concerns, India advocates for the inclusion of developing economy-specific considerations in the FSB’s guidelines. The country also urges for technical assistance and capacity-building support to be extended to these nations. Additionally, it proposes a global outreach initiative to raise awareness of the risks, commencing with nations experiencing higher levels of crypto adoption.Broadening the scopeAnother noteworthy suggestion from India is an extension of the regulatory approach beyond the G20’s scope, encompassing the broader digital economy. While recognizing that crypto is merely one facet of the sweeping digital transformation reshaping multiple sectors, India’s document underscores the need for enhanced cooperation and coordination among various stakeholders and authorities at both national and international levels.In this vein, India proposes that the G20 contemplate formulating a comprehensive framework for the digital economy. This framework should encompass a wide array of concerns, including data governance, digital taxation, digital identity, digital inclusion, and fostering digital innovation, according to the document.India’s exploration of diverse aspects related to cryptocurrency — ranging from legal status to taxation implications, central bank digital currency (CBDC) potential, and innovation possibilities — further underlines its desire to see greater international cohesion in relation to the regulation of digital assets.

Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), the independent government agency that regulates activity within Taiwan’s securities, virtual assets, banking and insurance sectors, is planning to invite applications from financial institutions to participate in a crypto custody services pilot program, scheduled to commence in Q1 2025. The Central News Agency (CNA), the national news agency of the Republic of China, published a report on Oct. 8, outlining the FSC’s intentions with regard to this crypto custody pilot program. The media outlet confirmed that three Taiwanese banks had expressed an interest in participating in the program.  The Director of the FSC’s Comprehensive Planning Division, Hu Zehua, outlined at a press conference that the regulator is planning to provide further information relative to the pilot program 15 days in advance of inviting applications from prospective participants. Photo by 張 峻嘉 on UnsplashPublic consultationAdditionally, the FSC executive outlined that the regulator intends to collect feedback from the public relative to the proposed pilot program, and fine-tune the process based upon that feedback. Hu stated that he recognizes that based on crypto custody activity carried out overseas, operational security is of paramount importance. Therefore, the FSC is interested in placing emphasis on this aspect of the activity as part of the pilot program.  Illicit funds and money laundering is another area of concern. With that the FSC executive outlined that financial institutions must proactively block virtual assets that are found to originate from illicit sources. In August a Taiwanese couple was indicted for laundering around $50 million in illegal funds through cryptocurrencies. Earlier this month, the FSC revised Taiwan’s regulatory framework relative to anti-money laundering (AML). The update now requires digital assets firms to register with the Taiwanese government by no later than September 2025. Failure to do so may result in these crypto companies being fined up to $156,000 or company executives facing up to two years in prison. Bitcoin, Ethereum and Dogecoin mentionedPilot program applicants will be expected to specify the type of digital assets they intend to custody. Explanatory information released by the FSC gave Bitcoin, Ethereum and Dogecoin as examples. Additionally, applicants are required to outline the type of client they will cater towards in providing a crypto custody service. Among the examples mentioned were virtual asset platforms, professional investors and general investors. The FSC announced at the end of last month that professional investors are now permitted to access foreign virtual asset exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and invest in them through a re-entrustment method. Taiwan has been making progress recently in bringing about regulatory clarity and establishing conditions within which Web3 companies can develop. The FSC had been working towards the production of draft crypto regulations over recent months. This followed a move by Taiwanese legislators in October 2024 to introduce the Virtual Asset Management Bill to parliament, with the objective of strengthening customer protections and establishing industry supervision. In September, the regulator released guidelines, including a measure which bans overseas crypto platforms from operating within the country.