Zipmex Thailand halts crypto trading citing SEC compliance

During a National Policy Committee audit, South Korean lawmakers pressed financial regulators on their oversight of the domestic crypto market, focusing on Binance’s acquisition of local exchange Gopax, risks from order-book sharing with foreign platforms, and weaknesses in anti–money laundering (AML) controls.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashQuestions over Gopax compensationAccording to Kuki News, Democratic Party lawmaker Min Byeong-dug has urged regulators to reach out to Binance for details on its plan to compensate Gopax creditors following its acquisition of the local exchange. One of the nation’s five fiat-to-crypto exchanges, Gopax suspended withdrawals from its GoFi service, a yield-bearing product, in November 2022 after the collapse of the Bahamas-based FTX crypto exchange and the bankruptcy of Genesis, a U.S.-based crypto financial services firm. Citing investor losses estimated at 10 billion to 50 billion won (about $7 million–$35 million), Min said Binance had agreed to cover the shortfall as part of its cashless acquisition of Gopax, but full repayment to Korean users remains unresolved. He noted that the deal had faced delays due to concerns raised by the Financial Services Commission’s (FSC) Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) over Binance’s eligibility as a major shareholder, and urged the FSC and FIU to ensure a clear and timely resolution for affected investors. Concerns over order-book sharingPeople Power Party (PPP) lawmaker Lee Heon-seung raised additional concerns about order-book sharing tied to the Binance–Gopax deal, warning it could create regulatory blind spots. According to Dailian, he asked the FIU about risks such as possible gaps in AML oversight at foreign exchanges and the potential exposure of Korean user data. FIU head Park Gwang said inadequate AML systems at overseas platforms can hinder fund tracing. He noted that separate approval is required before a domestic exchange can share its order book with a foreign platform, adding that no such request was under discussion. Park said the FIU would closely examine the matter and ensure protection of personal data. Lee also questioned how effectively regulators can supervise the crypto market given its scale, pointing to the Bithumb exchange as an example, where he had raised similar concerns about order-book sharing. Bithumb serves about 3.8 million users and records roughly 605 trillion won (approximately $426 billion) in annual trading volume. He said order-book sharing with major global exchanges such as Binance could complicate AML compliance, data protection, and regulatory oversight, and called for stronger enforcement. In response, Park said that the agency would ensure proper supervision to address these risks. Allegations of AML loopholes and illicit useAnother PPP lawmaker, Kim Jae-sub, flagged a potential AML loophole involving Binance, saying the exchange had allegedly been used by Cambodia’s Prince Group, which is linked to fraudulent schemes to conceal illicit funds. Last week, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a civil forfeiture complaint to seize roughly 127,271 Bitcoin linked to Prince Group’s operations, marking the largest seizure in its history. Kim also cited past allegations connecting Binance to illicit transactions involving Hamas and North Korea, and said the exchange’s founder faces related charges. He urged the FSC to conduct a thorough examination to determine the extent of any involvement if the claims prove accurate. As the parliamentary audit continues, lawmakers from both parties are pressing regulators to clarify standards, tighten oversight, and prioritize investor protection while maintaining fair and predictable rules for market participants. 

Late Korean artist Lee Jung-seob’s ‘Bull’ NFT on auction at OpenSeaNFT marketplace OpenSea is hosting an ongoing auction for a digital representation of the painting “Bull” by the late Korean artist Lee Jung-seob, Yonhap News TV reported on Tuesday. Celebrated for his distinctive lines in his paintings, Lee passed away in 1956. This auction is set to conclude on Dec. 12, with the starting bid placed at 300 WETH (Wrapped Ethereum), which is approximately equivalent to $626,000.Photo by Hans Eiskonen on UnsplashWhite bull as NFTLee’s “Bull,” featured in the OpenSea auction, is distinguished by its depiction of a white bull set against a dark green background. This particular piece is one of Lee’s unpublished works and is currently being offered for sale by a private art collector. Regarding the authenticity of the painting, the description on the OpenSea page states, “This work received a handwritten evaluation from Professor Jung Jum-sik, a founding member of the Lee Jung-seob Art Award, on November 9, 2000.”The current owner of the original artwork has expressed their intention for auctioning it as a desire to share a valuable piece of art. The painting originally belonged to poet Ku Sang and has since changed hands multiple times, experiencing some damage along the way. While the copyright for an artist’s work typically remains with their inheritors for 70 years posthumously, in the case of Lee Jung-seob, this period has already lapsed.Authenticity and NFT investmentsMeanwhile, art appraisal experts are advising caution, emphasizing the need to first confirm the authenticity of the original painting. This caution stems from the fact that the painting has not undergone evaluation by an official appraisal organization.During his interview with Yonhap, Jung Jun-mo, CEO of Korea Art Authentication Appraisal Inc., offered a word of caution regarding investment in NFTs tied to artworks with questionable authenticity. He emphasized that NFTs representing works that lack genuine authentication also hold no value in terms of authenticity. Jung advised potential investors to thoroughly verify the legitimacy of such artworks before proceeding with any investment in their NFT representations.Last year, many paintings of modern Korean artists were converted into NFTs, but they sparked controversy over issues of authenticity. Experts in art investment have since been advising thorough research prior to making any investments in these digital assets. They warn that losses incurred from transactions involving these NFTs fall squarely on the investors.

The Current Status of Crypto in AsiaWith the United States having taken a very harsh line relative to cryptocurrency of late, there has been a lot of chatter surrounding the likelihood of Asia driving crypto forward. With that in mind, we’ve taken a look at the state of crypto in a number of Asian countries.©Pexels/RODNAE ProductionsJapanJapan is among the most crypto-friendly developed nations globally, having acknowledged Bitcoin as a legal payment mode and regulated crypto exchanges in 2017. Bitflyer and Bitbank are among the crypto exchanges operating in Japan, which currently has over 23 authorized crypto exchanges.The country aims to balance consumer protection and innovation by requiring crypto exchanges to register with the FSA, comply with stringent rules on security, anti-money laundering, and reporting, undergo regular FSA audits and inspections, and be part of the Japan Virtual Currency Exchange Association (JVCEA) for self-regulation.Despite being regulated, Japan’s crypto market is lively, with the Yen ranking second for Bitcoin trading volume by currency. The country has a flourishing crypto community, including blockchain firm LayerX, which requires ChatGPT expertise. Japan is also exploring the potential of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and plans to launch a pilot program with private sector partners in 2023 to test their feasibility for various use cases, aligning with the country’s strict approach to crypto.Japan’s crypto taxation is unfavorable, with crypto gains taxed at the same rates as regular income, potentially reaching up to 55% for higher income brackets. However, Japan is one of the few countries with comprehensive guidelines on crypto taxation, with the NTA providing a detailed document that explains different types of transactions and their corresponding tax calculations.ChinaChina’s ban on crypto mining led to many miners moving their operations overseas or selling their equipment at a loss. However, China’s crypto-mining industry bounced back, with a 21% share of the global hash rate. While China has a competitive advantage in cheap electricity, regulatory risks remain.China’s digital yuan is a legal tender fully backed by the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) and pegged to the renminbi. Unlike most cryptocurrencies, it is not decentralized or anonymous but is monitored by the PBOC. Adoption has been slow despite various partnerships and pilot tests, including with WeChat Pay.China is working with other countries on the Multiple CBDC Bridge project to explore the feasibility of cross-border fund transfers among different currencies. Launching its own CBDC may allow China to reduce its reliance on the US dollar and increase its influence over global trade and monetary policy. However, the success of that endeavor is questionable.Hong KongHong Kong is a crypto-friendly jurisdiction that faces banking access and mainland influence challenges. Despite difficulties opening local bank accounts after the closure of two crypto-friendly banks, Hong Kong remains committed to fostering its fintech hub status.The government proposed allowing retail investors to trade cryptocurrencies and ETFs and reviewing property rights for tokenized assets while considering legalizing smart contracts. Crypto purchases for all citizens are due to be legalized in June 2023. These measures should attract more investors and businesses to the city’s crypto industry.Nonetheless, Hong Kong must overcome hurdles regarding banking access and regulatory uncertainty from mainland China to maintain its attractive status for crypto businesses and investors.SingaporeSingapore has a supportive crypto ecosystem and regulations with low tax rates, favorable policies, strong financial center reputation, and proximity to other Asian markets. Notable international crypto players with offices in Singapore include Coinbase, Crypto.com and Kraken.However, Singapore imposes strict rules on crypto service providers to prevent illicit activities, requiring digital payment token (DPT) services to obtain a license under the Payment Services Act or face fines and jail time. Singapore’s crypto industry also faces competition from other jurisdictions, such as Hong Kong and the UAE, offering tax incentives and favorable legal frameworks.IndiaIndia’s crypto industry faces uncertainties due to the lack of a clear regulatory framework and frequent changes in the government’s stance. Despite having a large tech-savvy population and an active crypto community, the industry struggles with regulatory compliance and legal risks. In 2018, the Reserve Bank of India’s ban on banking channels cut off many crypto businesses and users.The Supreme Court of India later overturned the ban, but draft bills to ban or regulate crypto have since been proposed without official introduction or passage. India recently imposed a preemptive ban on crypto advertising and sponsorships and is exploring the integration of a CBDC. India’s position on crypto leans toward the anti-crypto side, just short of an outright ban.For brevity, we’ve confined discussion to these five Asian venues. However, it would be remiss of us not to mention that Vietnam has one of the highest levels of crypto adoption in the world while having a crypto trading ban in place. Not so in South Korea where crypto trading is legal, with strict regulation having been put in place. Meanwhile, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approved four cryptocurrencies as tradable assets, with crypto trading in the country having a legal status.It’s difficult to figure out precisely how crypto will develop geographically but it seems certain that its future will be molded to some extent in Asia.