BitGo Singapore launched to serve APAC region

Singapore Elects Crypto Skeptic as PresidentGarnering 70.4% of all votes cast on Saturday, Singaporeans chose to elect Tharman Shanmugaratnam as their next president, a move that may have implications for Singapore’s outlook when it comes to digital assets.While many had hoped that he would be the nation’s first non-Chinese prime minister, the crypto industry has greeted his rise to this largely ceremonial role with mixed feelings. Shanmugaratnam’s previous stances on cryptocurrency and digital assets have been predominantly critical.Photo by Justin Lim on UnsplashFormer MAS ChairmanIn the past, the president-elect has referred to cryptocurrency as “slightly crazy” and “purely speculative.” His ascent to the presidency comes after a distinguished career that includes serving as the former finance minister, deputy prime minister, and chairman of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the country’s central bank, from 2011 to 2023.Crypto platform collapsesIt was during his tenure at MAS that two prominent crypto companies, Three Arrows Capital (3AC) and Terraform Labs, faced catastrophic collapses.The demise of Terraform Labs, along with its TerraUSD (UST) stablecoin, triggered a severe “crypto winter” in May 2022, from which the industry is still struggling to recover. This downfall wiped out a staggering $500 billion in value over just two weeks, devastating the portfolios of numerous retail investors.The ripple effect of TerraUSD’s fall also engulfed 3AC, a significant cryptocurrency hedge fund headquartered in Singapore. The contagion spread across the cryptocurrency market, leading to the downfall of other major entities like crypto lending platforms Celsius Network and Voyager Digital, alongside Singapore-based Hodlnaut.Given that these catastrophic events unfolded during Shanmugaratnam’s tenure at MAS, it’s plausible that he bore the brunt of the consequences. That might explain why in speaking on the subject in 2021, he appeared to be more accommodative, suggesting that there may be a useful role that crypto could play and highlighting that Singapore had allowed crypto businesses to develop within the city-state.In June of last year, MAS reprimanded 3AC for providing misleading information and exceeding the allowed assets under management (AUM) threshold, thereby breaching its status as a registered fund management company.In January, Shanmugaratnam said that regulating the crypto sector would give credibility to speculation and on that basis, it would be best to leave it unregulated. He went on to suggest that crypto should be subject to existing regulation as laid down for traditional finance.Early stage concernsBack in 2018, when he was Singapore’s finance minister, Shanmugaratnam questioned the wisdom of broad regulation potentially legitimizing a speculative and “slightly crazy” market. During the 2018 World Economic Forum, he emphasized the importance of anti-money laundering measures and advocated for educating consumers about the risks inherent in the unregulated crypto sector.Although he acknowledged blockchain’s potential to enhance global payment systems, Shanmugaratnam favored integrating existing traditional payment mechanisms as an alternative to blockchain innovations.Singapore’s new president brings with him a history of skepticism towards cryptocurrency and digital assets. However, with a largely ceremonial role relative to day-to-day governance, he’s not in a position to take direct action that could hold the sector back although he will have the power to initiate corruption investigations upon the advice of the Singaporean cabinet.

China’s Fuzhou City Offers Incentives to Entice Blockchain Start-UpsAdministrators in Fuzhou city, the capital and one of the largest cities in China’s Fujian Province, have introduced a raft of policies aimed at enticing blockchain-centric companies to establish themselves in the city.Photo by 尧智 林 on UnsplashMonetary rewardsThe measures are understood to include rent subsidies applicable to the use of commercial office space in the city, as well as the payment of cash rewards based on such start-up businesses hitting various revenue targets. The cash reward incentives are being capped at 500,000 yuan, around $71,800 US dollars, for each applicable project.The city administrators are also offering cash rewards to institutions within the city area and local blockchain firms in cases where they attain government-issued certifications. Another category through which these entities can reap more cash rewards is in providing training services centered upon blockchain technology.A blockchain firm basing itself within the city limits that is successful in attaining state certification reflecting its status as a national level laboratory specializing in blockchain technologies may be awarded as much as 1 million yuan ($144,000).Rent subsidiesThree specific industrial locations are applicable where the rent subsidy is concerned. Blockchain-based businesses wanting to avail of that incentive will have access to an annual rent subsidy of up to 600,000 yuan ($86,300) for every 1,000 square meters of commercial office space that they rent.Stepping up activityThere seems to be heightened activity related to various aspects of blockchain-related technology within China’s borders in recent months. It appears that while the country is taking the initiative with blockchain-related technology, that excludes the development of or open market use of decentralized cryptocurrencies.China has been pursuing a policy of pushing cryptocurrency beyond its borders in recent years, to include bans on cryptocurrency exchanges and crypto miners. However, over recent months, it is allowing this segment of the overall blockchain innovation to develop within the autonomous Chinese territory of Hong Kong. In fact, it’s actively encouraging it. It’s quite a savvy move by the Chinese who don’t want their citizens using decentralized cryptocurrency generally but are quite happy to still participate on a global level in that sector, by having Hong Kong make efforts to become a regional crypto hub.A second strand to its overall strategy appears to be a concerted effort to expand the user base within China of the digital yuan, its central bank digital currency (CBDC). A series of initiatives have been rolled out in an effort to bring the CBDC into active use. China remains the global leader in CBDC development, much further along in that process than its international peers.Lastly, it’s strategically pursuing the development of blockchain-related business, just as this initiative in Fuzhou indicates. The local government initiative is not an isolated one. Last Wednesday, China’s National Blockchain Technology Innovation Center was formally launched. As far back as 2019, Beijing-based smart contract platform Trias has been assisting authorities in Fuzhou in utilizing blockchain in an effort to better manage its electrical grid infrastructure.

NFTs not subject to South Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection ActIn anticipation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act coming into effect in July of next year, the South Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) has issued an advance notice regarding its subordinate statutes.Photo by Ethan Brooke on UnsplashSeven specific provisionsThe subsidiary regulations under the Act detail seven specific provisions aligned with the Act’s objectives. Firstly, assets categorized as electronic securities, mobile vouchers, deposit tokens backed by the Bank of Korea’s central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) will not be classified as virtual assets and hence, not regulated by this Act. However, in instances where NFTs are used as a means of payment for specific goods or services, they will be regarded as virtual assets.Secondly, banks will take responsibility for managing the deposits of users on cryptocurrency exchanges. This aligns with the Act’s requirement for virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to keep users’ funds separate from their own, either by depositing them in, or entrusting them to, reputable institutions. Under these regulations, banks are required to manage users’ assets in a manner consistent with how investors’ deposits are handled under the Capital Markets Act. This means that banks are allowed to invest VASP users’ assets only in secure instruments, such as state and local government bonds, and are also obligated to pay fees to deposit owners, taking into account the yields of these investments.80% of user assets in cold walletsThe third key aspect of the regulations is that VASPs are required to store a minimum of 80% of user assets in cold wallets, which are not connected to the internet. This is higher than the current requirement of 70%, enhancing the security measures for users of virtual assets. To calculate the total value of a virtual asset at any given time, its total supply is multiplied by its average daily price over the past year. VASPs are obligated to assess the value of virtual assets every month.The fourth regulation mandates that VASPs must enroll in an insurance plan, contribute to a rainy day fund or accumulate reserves. This is to ensure they can fulfill their compensation responsibilities in the event of incidents like security breaches or technical failures. The required preparation amount is set at a minimum of 5% of the user assets stored in hot wallets, as these are more susceptible to risks. VASPs are required to update their compensation thresholds or reserves monthly and must take any necessary actions to comply with these requirements by the next working day following the update.Information disclosure guidelinesAnother regulation addresses the issue of insider trading in the context of the virtual asset market. Under the current Capital Markets Act, information is considered disclosed when it’s made available through disclosure systems of the FSC or the Korea Exchange (KRX). However, since the cryptocurrency market lacks a similar system, the new statute provides criteria for determining when information is deemed disclosed.For instance, if a VASP, including exchanges, releases crucial information about a virtual asset on an exchange and six hours pass, that information is regarded as disclosed. This acknowledges the non-stop nature of the crypto market. Moreover, information disclosed post 6 p.m. is treated as officially disclosed after 9 a.m. the next day.Additionally, if a virtual asset issuer publishes significant information about its token on a website hosting its white paper, the information is deemed public after one day. This is conditional upon the website being publicly accessible and having consistently provided important token information for the preceding six months.These rules aim to provide clarity and fairness in information disclosure in the crypto market, adapting the principles of traditional financial markets to the unique dynamics of virtual assets.No arbitrary suspension of transactionsThe sixth regulation restricts VASPs from arbitrarily halting deposits and withdrawals of virtual assets unless there are justifiable reasons for such actions. Acceptable circumstances for suspending these transactions include situations where the VASP experiences a technical disruption in its system, where regulatory authorities instruct a VASP to cease deposits and withdrawals or where cyberattacks or similar incidents have occurred or are clearly imminent.Lastly, virtual asset exchanges are required to monitor for abnormal transactions continuously. These are transactions that show substantial shifts in the prices or trading volumes of virtual assets, particularly in response to news or rumors that could influence cryptocurrency prices. If VASPs suspect unfair trading practices, they must report to the FSC or the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS). When there is ample evidence of such activities, crypto exchanges are obligated to notify the police or the prosecutors’ office. In addition, the financial regulator has the authority to levy fines based on the prosecution’s decisions or after completing consultations with the prosecution if a year has passed since the day of the report.During the period of advance notice, which spans from Nov. 11 to Jan. 22, the FSC will seek comments from relevant organizations, experts and businesses. This process is aimed at refining the rules and regulations subordinate to the Virtual Asset User Protection Act. Moving forward, the financial authorities plan to publish a set of guidelines and Q&A materials and conduct explanatory sessions, with the goal of ensuring a smooth implementation of the Act.