Avalon integrated with Bybit to offer Bitcoin yield

PDAX gears up for trading surge amidst Binance market exitThe Philippine Digital Asset Exchange (PDAX), an order book exchange, is planning to take full advantage of Binance’s regulatory issues in the Philippines, with the expectation of an uptick in trading volume as a direct consequence.Photo by iSawRed on UnsplashMarket opportunityAccording to a Filipino English-language broadsheet publication, The Daily Tribune, PDAX CEO Nichel Gaba sees the exit of Binance, flagged by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as an unauthorized exchange in the Philippines, as a pivotal moment for local virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to expand their market presence. Gaba envisions that the anticipated migration of traders from Binance could propel the country’s cryptocurrency trading volume to an estimated $6 billion by 2024.Data from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) demonstrates that there are currently 17 VASPs in the Philippines, with 10 operational and seven inactive. As one of the operational ones, PDAX is preparing for the expected growth in the local sector.The SEC in the Philippines has been actively working towards imposing a ban on Binance, citing various issues both locally and internationally. Gaba predicts that this development will prompt a substantial number of Filipino cryptocurrency traders to seek alternative, legitimate trading platforms. Gaba stated:“Now that Binance is being banned, there are a lot of users wondering where they can go and the best option for them is to go to a licensed exchange like PDAX. Our strategy as a company is to focus on being the best alternative.”Binance ban countdownAccording to local news outlet BitPinas, the head of the Philippines SEC, Kelvin Lee, clarified that Binance and any other unregistered exchange issued with an advisory have three months before they are banned from the country.Addressing the confusion surrounding the ban during a panel discussion on Wednesday, Lee stated that the ban would be in effect three months from the issuance date of Nov. 29. In that way, time has been allowed for feedback and potential extensions.While the original recommendation was for a shorter transition period, Lee extended it, considering the upcoming Christmas holiday, stating, “Not to make it hard for Filipino investors during that time.”Two additional exchanges bannedIn addition to Binance, Lee mentioned that OctaFX and MiTrade, along with other exchanges that have received advisories for unregistered operations, will also face bans after three months. The local SEC disclosed having a sizable list of unregistered exchanges that will gradually emerge.Responding to criticisms of the ban, given that some users find Binance to be “cheaper” than other registered exchanges, Lee emphasized the importance of compliance costs and consumer protection. He urged local investors to “invest in registered entities” among the 17 VASPs registered in the country that offer fiat-to-crypto services.The BSP-regulated VASPs are expected to process crypto assets worth approximately $3 billion by the end of the year. However, this estimate does not take into account unregulated transactions occurring outside of VASP channels.

Hong Kong Says No to Light Touch RegulationThe CEO of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has said that while the autonomous territory will allow innovation to develop in the crypto space, that will not mean light touch regulation.Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashLowering guard railsAfter a three year hiatus, the Bloomberg Wealth Asia Summit returned to Hong Kong on Tuesday. Speaking at the conference, Eddie Yue, the CEO of the HKMA, Hong Kong’s regulatory body, outlined that the territory intends to enable innovation relative to crypto businesses that establish themselves in Hong Kong.“We will let the industry develop and innovate, we will let them create an ecosystem here,” he said. However, he added the following caveat: “But that doesn’t mean light touch regulation. If any participant thinks that the regulation is too tight, they’re welcome to go elsewhere.”Yue outlined that over the course of the past three years, guardrails relative to the operation of crypto-related activities were excessively high. Yue alluded to a new approach that sees those guard rails dropped to a level whereby innovation will be enabled in the digital assets space. However, he followed up by underlining the fact that the Authority has no intention of following a light touch regulatory approach.No safeguards not an optionAlthough acknowledging that Hong Kong may have been excessively crypto unfriendly relative to digital asset regulation in the recent past, he believes that Hong Kong has now got it right. “Our guardrails are lower, to a reasonable and sustainable level,” Yue said.The HKMA regulator flagged jurisdictions that provide little or no guardrails at all as the ones that will run into difficulties. “If you look elsewhere, there are no guardrails in some places, the guardrails are very low and there you see problems”, Yue clarified.He cited FTX as a stand out example of a basic lack of internal controls. FTX International was based in the Bahamas. While customers of FTX International find themselves in a difficult position, those of subsidiary companies FTX Japan and FTX Europe are having their funds returned as a direct consequence of much better regulatory safeguards in those regions.“All those wrongdoings by the platforms that we saw in the last one or two years will not happen in Hong Kong,” Yue claimed.A continuing trendWhile many commentators and critics from the conventional world have described bitcoin and crypto as a ponzi or a passing fad, Yue pointed out that digital assets are not going anywhere and that the trend towards digital assets will continue. Expanding further, he articulated that the overarching digital assets sector encompasses much more than just crypto: “Virtual assets or crypto is actually a very broad term. It’s not really about crypto, you’re talking about stablecoins or tokenized assets in the future.”A mere $0.3 trillion of illiquid real world assets have been tokenized thus far. It’s anticipated that this level of tokenization will climb to $16 trillion by 2030.

The recent 19b-4 approval of spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is putting pressure on South Korean financial regulators to revisit their policies on digital assets. The SEC's decision to allow ETFs for Ethereum, the world's second-largest cryptocurrency, on May 24, 2024, follows its earlier endorsement of Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024. This move is seen as a significant step in merging traditional finance with the digital asset sector.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashKorean regulatory cautionIn contrast to the progressive stance in the U.S., the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) have maintained a cautious approach regarding the integration of crypto assets into traditional securities markets. According to current regulations under the Capital Markets Act, ETFs in Korea are limited to traditional underlying assets such as financial instruments, securities, international currencies and commodities. These foundations are crucial for the creation of financial derivatives, leaving little room for digital assets under current laws. Calls for regulatory reforms and market implicationsThe decision by the SEC is expected to influence the Korean regulators to update their views on digital assets, according to local media and industry experts. Jung Eui-jung, the head of the Korean Stockholders’ Alliance, has advocated for Korea to emulate the U.S. by approving Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs. He expressed concerns that continued regulatory hesitance could lead to investor funds migrating to more progressive markets like the U.S., potentially positioning the U.S. to broaden its crypto market further. Xangle, a digital currency data provider in Seoul, has also criticized the current regulations as outdated, emphasizing the need for revisions to accommodate the increasing relevance of digital assets in global finance.