Korean Financial Watchdog Warns Investors Against Crypto Scams

Korea’s DAXA Prohibits Relisting of Delisted Cryptos for a YearThe Digital Asset Exchange Alliance (DAXA) in Korea will prohibit the relisting of cryptocurrencies delisted from its member exchanges for a year, according to Korean media outlet Edaily.©Pexels/Jan van der WolfDAXA’s arbitrary regulationSome criticize this regulation, arbitrarily created by DAXA, which consists of five major Korean cryptocurrency exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax), as this rule poses a significant impact on crypto issuers and investors.In fact, a blockchain industry insider said that when cryptos are designated by DAXA as a risky asset, their operators receive a notification from the group that relisting is possible after a year once delisted. So far, assets that have been delisted or designated as such are WEMIX, PCI, BASIC, SRM, and OMG.Coinone’s relisting of WEMIXDAXA added this stipulation, as it faced criticism for the absence of relisting regulations in its guidelines when Coinone, one of its members, exclusively relisted the WEMIX token. This raised doubts about the self-regulation of the industry because DAXA had decided the delisting of WEMIX on the grounds that the information on its circulation supply was unreliable.Crypto enterprises are complaining about DAXA’s devising of strict penalties when delisting processes are not transparent. DAXA has stated that a consensus has been reached for the first draft and it will be continuously revised.Stronger DAXA presenceThe Korean crypto industry forecasts that this regulation will empower DAXA’s presence in the crypto scene, considering that its members are responsible for 98% of the domestic trading volume.Experts note that DAXA needs to establish fairness and transparency in order for it to gain trust as a self-regulatory body. Park Yong-beom, Chairman of the Korea Society of Blockchain, said rules on listing and delisting have to be fair and transparent, and if market participants find them unconvincing, it would undermine the credibility and authority of the self-regulatory body.In an interview with Economic Review, Former KB Kookmin Bank CEO Lee Kun-ho suggested that DAXA should prioritize market vitalization and ecosystem strengthening. He believes that instead of focusing on market management and supervision, DAXA should concentrate on enhancing investor protection.

The Need for Crypto Regulation Improvements in South KoreaAlthough the cryptocurrency market entered a bearish phase last year, there are prospects for growth as regulatory inclusion and market transparency begin to improve. However, the domestic market is currently hindered by deepening monopolies and inadequate support policies, limiting the development of the industry, said Kim Jin-won, Executive Director of Korean crypto exchange COREDAX, during a conference last Friday in Seoul.The conference, hosted by the Federation of Korean Industries, invited experts to discuss the oncoming era of convergence and the current status and challenges of virtual asset legislation in South Korea, as well as the necessary steps for improving regulations on virtual assets.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashGlobal decentralization trendsOverseas, various decentralized projects, such as the integration of blockchain technology into traditional financial markets, have led to the growth of related markets such as Bitcoin futures, decentralized finance (DeFi), over-the-counter (OTC) trading, custodial services, the metaverse, and Web3. However, in Korea, the lack of clear guidance or policy management for crypto businesses and services prevents the market from thriving.Countries like the US and Japan as well as the European Union (EU) are overhauling regulations in order to dominate the global industry and market through blockchain technology and virtual assets. Kim emphasized that Korea also needs to incorporate such flexible regulatory improvements considering the likely possibility that various industries are going to thrive on crypto-related businesses.Challenging existing regulations and calls for clarityHe started off by stating that the implicit regulation known as the “One Exchange, One Bank” principle was created for administrative convenience and is acting as a barrier to entry into the crypto industry. He argued that it is a discriminatory regulation, especially considering the fact that securities firms choose to operate stock trading accounts through multiple banks.Regarding the standards for issuing bank accounts under real names, which will be determined by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), he argued that they are difficult to comply with, even for banks that already have contracts with crypto exchanges. He called for the FIU to express a clear stance on the retroactive application of these standards to avoid potential consequences such as barriers to market entry for late-movers.“The crypto market — including DeFi, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), artificial intelligence (AI), the metaverse, and Web3 — is growing at an annual average rate of 12.8%, and is expected to reach a scale of $4.9 billion by 2030,” he said. “When combined with Web3 innovation, the metaverse will evolve into a 3D platform business that incorporates the use of payment methods, NFTs, and virtual assets.”Promoting innovation in the crypto industryTo foster such industry growth, it is necessary to actively explore new types of services as well as potential challenges. Innovative financial services should also be designated or promoted through regulatory sandboxes. The regulatory sandbox is a system run by the Korean government that exempts or suspends existing regulations for a designated amount of time for companies releasing new products and services and regulates them post-mortem if there is a problem.Kim went on to propose specific measures such as negative regulations — regulations that outline what is prohibited by law while allowing everything else — to promote new industries. He also suggested that banks should be allowed to engage in custodial services for virtual assets.Furthermore, he highlighted the need for cooperation between payment companies and crypto firms. “Payment service providers like Visa and Mastercard are already collaborating with global crypto exchanges to incorporate virtual assets into their businesses,” he said. “With companies like Tesla, eBay, and more adopting or considering adopting cryptocurrency as a payment method, we must consider allowing collaborations between domestic credit card companies, payment gateway companies, and crypto firms.”He also urged for the early approval of initial exchange offerings (IEOs) to stimulate the crypto market and advocated for support policies for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). He cited examples such as brokering transactions for security tokens, allowing OTC trading, requesting security token issuance assessments through system integration with account management agencies, and permitting outsourcing for issuance operations.

The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has unveiled a new roadmap for digital asset regulation titled “ASPIRe.” The authorities in the Chinese autonomous territory have been working towards crypto hub status in recent years. This latest ASPIRe roadmap initiative has been formulated in an effort to future-proof Hong Kong’s status as a location that has been optimized for crypto businesses to form and develop. The ASPIRe roadmap was announced by the SFC on Feb. 19 with comprehensive details on the plan published to the regulator’s website. Photo by Skull Kat on UnsplashFive pillarsA-S-P-I-Re details five pillars that the regulator is focusing on in order to address challenges to strengthen Hong Kong’s crypto hub status going forward. The “A” pillar refers to “access,” with a focus on fostering an ecosystem that’s aligned with a regulatory regime that enables global participation. The regulator wants to attract “qualified participants,” while enhancing investor choice and integrating Hong Kong’s digital assets sector with global liquidity. The “S” pillar stands for “safeguards” with the objective of adopting risk-proportionate oversight, promoting regulatory clarity and aligning compliance requirements such that a balance is struck between core regulatory objectives and providing flexibility for the adoption of new technology. “Products” forms another pillar, with a focus on expanding the range of digital asset products and services offered by regulated service providers in Hong Kong. “Infrastructure” is another aspect that the plan homes in on. The focus in this regard is on modernizing reporting, surveillance and cross-agency collaboration through infrastructure building and the use of new technology.  The final pillar, “relationships” (Re), focuses on the empowerment of both investors and the industry in general through education, engagement and transparency. Influencing modern financeThe Hong Kong regulator is putting forward this plan with the understanding that the global virtual asset market was valued at $3 trillion in 2024. It suggests that the sector “has significantly influenced modern finance.” At Consensus Hong Kong 2025 this week, a crypto conference held in the Chinese autonomous territory, SFC CEO Julia Leung suggested that this plan will put Hong Kong in a strong position to secure its role as a crypto industry hub going forward. Hong Kong Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po also delivered a keynote speech at the conference. He said that Hong Kong would “remain a stable, open and vibrant market for digital assets,” adding that Hong Kong is “investing heavily in the related infrastructure and talent development.” Mo-po went on to assert that Hong Kong’s Cyberport Web3 network and the Hong Kong Science and Technology Park are “vibrant hubs for Web3 innovation and fintech.” He also claimed that industry partnerships and the city’s universities are bringing through blockchain expertise.  The Financial Secretary understands the importance of appropriate regulation. He stated: “The key to success lies in maintaining an open, fair, balanced and forward-looking regulatory approach that is conducive to the sustainable and responsible development of financial innovation, including Web3.”