OPNX Enables Margin Trading via oUSD

Kbank’s Upbit Customer Deposits Total $2.2BKbank, an internet-only bank in South Korea, is facing criticism due to its relatively high proportion of cryptocurrency customer deposits compared to other banks. Kbank reportedly manages approximately KRW 3 trillion (equivalent to $2.2 billion) in deposits from customers of cryptocurrency exchange Upbit, which accounts for about 18% of its total customer deposits.This percentage stands out, being notably higher than other banks that provide accounts to the other four crypto-to-fiat exchanges in Korea. That is according to a report by Maeil Business Newspaper, which obtained documents submitted to lawmaker Kim Hee-gon by the Financial Services Commission (FSC).According to Korean law, crypto exchanges must secure real-name bank accounts from banks to offer crypto trading services against the Korean won. Kbank offers its accounts to Upbit, the dominant player in the Korean crypto market.Photo by David McBee on PexelsNotable exposure to crypto exchangeThe FSC documents showed that Kbank’s Upbit customer deposits totaled KRW 3.09 trillion, making up 18% of its total deposits, which amount to KRW 17.2 trillion.In a striking contrast, Nonghyup Bank had 0.2% of its deposits, equivalent to KRW 557.8 billion, in Bithumb, which is the nation’s second-largest cryptocurrency exchange. Kakaobank, another internet-only bank, had 0.3% (KRW 112.2 billion) of its deposits in Coinone. Shinhan Bank held 0.01% (KRW 43 billion) in Korbit, and Jeonbuk Bank had a similarly small 0.02% (KRW 4.2 billion) in Gopax.Lawmaker Kim pointed out that Kbank has become a bank dedicated to crypto trading. Kim proposed that financial authorities take proactive measures to assess the potential risks that may emerge when Kbank utilizes Upbit customer deposits as a basis for offering credit loans. Such risky financial practices could potentially result in higher loan defaults and the emergence of a greater number of individuals with poor credit histories, which could ultimately jeopardize the stability of the financial market.Regulatory gapThe current Financial Transaction Reporting Act mandates that virtual asset service providers (VASPs) segregate customer deposits from their own assets as a measure to combat money laundering. However, it has been noted that there are regulatory gaps stemming from the absence of specific guidelines for the custody of these deposits.According to the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), Nonghyup and Kakaobank store deposits in separate accounts within the bank. On the other hand, Kbank and Jeonbuk Bank keep deposits in corporate accounts under their respective exchange partners’ names.When deposits are stored in separate accounts within the bank, only the bank has access to those funds, and they are essentially operated in a manner similar to a trust, preventing the bank from using the funds arbitrarily. In contrast, funds held in corporate accounts can be used by the bank as a source for lending. Lawmaker Kim warned that in scenarios such as exchange bankruptcies or similar situations, banks holding customer funds in corporate accounts could face difficulties in ensuring customer protection.Each of these banks receives reserve funds from crypto exchanges in anticipation of potential compensation requirements in the event of unforeseen losses. The FSS states that as of the end of last month, the reserve amounts held by each bank were as follows: Kbank had KRW 200 billion, Nonghyup Bank had KRW 100 billion, Kakao Bank had KRW 73 billion, and both Shinhan Bank and Jeonbuk Bank had KRW 30 billion.Kbank’s Upbit customer deposits are approximately 72 times larger than Shinhan Bank’s Korbit customer deposits. However, the reserve amounts held by Kbank are only 6.7 times greater than those held by Shinhan. Lawmaker Kim emphasized the importance of banks maintaining reserve funds that are proportional to the customer deposits held in their partner crypto exchanges.Signs of recoveryMeanwhile, the Korean cryptocurrency industry, which faced a downturn in the latter half of last year due to events like the Terra collapse and FTX’s bankruptcy, has exhibited signs of recovery in the first half of this year.The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the FSC recently reported that the cryptocurrency market cap in South Korea has reached KRW 28.4 trillion as of the end of June this year. This reflects a 46% increase compared to the end of last year when it stood at KRW 19.4 trillion. Additionally, the total operating profit of domestic exchanges surged by 82% to KRW 227.3 billion over the past six months, compared to the previous figure of KRW 124.9 billion.The total market’s max drawdown (MDD) was 62%. MDD assesses the extent to which an asset has declined in value from its highest point to its lowest point within a specific time frame, before experiencing a recovery. The FIU considers this MDD to be high, urging investor caution.

North Korea Using DeFi for Money LaunderingThe United States Treasury issued a warning on Thursday where it identifies North Korea as a user of DeFi services for money laundering. According to the Treasury, both North Korea and criminal organizations have been using DeFi platforms to launder dirty money.©Pexels/PixabayWhile DeFi has been praised for its potential to democratize finance and provide greater financial freedom to users, it has also been criticized for its lack of regulatory oversight. According to the Treasury, this lack of oversight has made DeFi platforms an attractive target for money launderers and other criminal organizations.In its warning, the Treasury noted that North Korea has been using DeFi platforms to launder money and evade international sanctions. The country is believed to have developed a sophisticated system for laundering money through cryptocurrency exchanges, and it is now turning its attention to DeFi platforms.Illicit money movementCriminal organizations are also using DeFi services for money laundering, according to the Treasury. These groups are said to be using DeFi platforms to move money around the world, in order to avoid detection and to launder the proceeds of their illicit activities.The use of DeFi for money laundering poses a significant challenge for law enforcement agencies, as these platforms operate outside of the traditional banking system and are often difficult to track. The Treasury has urged DeFi platforms to implement strong anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) policies, in order to prevent their services from being used for criminal activities.The warning from the Treasury comes at a time when DeFi is becoming increasingly popular among investors and users. According to data from DeFi Pulse, the total value locked in DeFi protocols recently surpassed $100 billion, indicating a significant level of interest and investment in the sector.Calls for greater regulationHowever, the lack of regulatory oversight and the potential for DeFi to be used for money laundering and other criminal activities have raised concerns among regulators and policymakers. Some have called for greater regulation of the sector, in order to prevent its abuse by criminal organizations.Despite these concerns, many proponents of DeFi argue that the sector has the potential to transform the financial industry and provide greater financial freedom to users. They point to the benefits of decentralized systems, such as greater transparency, lower fees, and faster transaction times.The use of DeFi for money laundering is a complex issue that requires a multifaceted approach. While regulators and policymakers must work to implement strong AML and KYC policies, users and investors must also take responsibility for ensuring that they are using DeFi platforms in a responsible and legal manner.Ultimately, the future of DeFi will depend on how the sector is able to balance innovation and regulation. While DeFi has the potential to transform the financial industry, it must also be subject to appropriate oversight and accountability in order to prevent its abuse by criminal organizations.By working together, regulators, policymakers, and industry stakeholders can help to ensure that DeFi is used for its intended purpose — to provide greater financial freedom and empowerment to users around the world.

Korean Prosecutors Say Do Kwon and His Colleagues Knew Terra Was Unviable from the BeginningKorean prosecutors claimed that Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon and the key members behind the Terra-LUNA crash were aware of the project’s unviability from the beginning, according to a file issued by the Seoul Southern District Court.©Terraform LabsTerraform Labs founders misleading Korean investorsTerraform Labs founders Do Kwon and Daniel Shin attracted 280,000 investors in Korea alone, claiming that the Terra stablecoin is a means of transaction, even though the company leaders had been notified by the financial authority that Terra-accepting businesses were impermissible. It is reported that during a search and seizure of the company, Korean prosecutors collected evidence that its employees shared such knowledge on their internal messaging system.Terra’s cross trading on crypto exchangesKnowing their cryptocurrency’s unviability, Terra executives registered its sister token LUNA for listing on major Korean crypto exchanges in May 2019. According to the Korean prosecution, they used a bot to create a trade volume of more than 800 million won in three domestic crypto exchanges by cross trading between 2019 and early last year.Cross trading is illegal in the stock market, as it is considered as an act of price manipulation, but LUNA was traded in crypto exchanges and it hasn’t been determined whether their token is a security or not. Under current Korean law, the court has to accept it as a security to punish those behind the Terra collapse.Shin’s denial of allegationsMeanwhile, Daniel Shin denied the prosecution’s allegations and argued that they had never received such a notice from the financial regulator.