Korean Lawmakers Make Progress on Virtual Asset User Protection Bill

South Korean FIU rejects Hanbitco’s bid to become fiat-to-crypto exchangeWhile numerous cryptocurrency-only exchanges in Korea have been vying for registration as fiat-to-crypto exchanges with the financial regulator, the government has turned down another platform’s attempt to achieve this status.Photo by Dim Hou on UnsplashUnmet standardsAccording to a report from local news provider MoneyToday, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC) recently convened a committee that decided against approving Hanbitco’s request to change its business status. Industry sources suggest that this decision was based on Hanbitco’s inability to meet the standards set by the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, often referred to as the Financial Transaction Reporting Act.Fine and cautionary orderA person familiar with the matter that the committee started deliberating on Hanbitco’s request to alter its business status about two weeks ago and ultimately decided against it. A significant factor in this decision might have been the KRW 2 billion ($1.49 million) fine levied on Hanbitco, stemming from numerous violations found in recent on-site inspections, the source added.Before approaching the FIU with its request, Hanbitco formed a partnership with Kwangju Bank in June to obtain real-name accounts, facilitating Korean won deposits and withdrawals. Achieving this is quite uncommon for a crypto-only exchange. In Korea, exchanges are legally required to have real-name bank accounts for trading in Korean won. Presently, only five platforms hold registration as fiat-to-crypto exchanges: Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit and Gopax, each having its own banking partnership.As per the details released by the FIU, besides the levied fine, Hanbitco was issued a cautionary order, and five of its employees faced reprimands.The fine of KRW 2 billion is the heaviest handed out to a virtual asset service provider from on-site inspections held between last year and the first half of this year. For perspective, Upbit, the country’s largest crypto exchange, was fined KRW 80 million.An FIU representative noted that during the evaluation of Hanbitco’s application to transition into a fiat-to-crypto exchange, factors such as the firm’s anti-money laundering (AML) protocols, its internal control systems and past sanctions played a role in the decision-making process.

Bakkt Signals Interest in Entering Hong Kong MarketBakkt, the US digital asset platform owned by Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., the owner of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), has set its sights on international expansion, with Hong Kong headlining its focus on regions that offer clearer regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrencies.Photo by Jimmy Chan on PexelsGreater regulatory clarity overseasCEO Gavin Michael highlighted Hong Kong as a target market for the company, given that the autonomous Chinese territory is making rapid progress in establishing regulatory clarity, and at a faster pace than in the United States. Alongside Hong Kong, Michael also earmarked the UK and parts of the EU as possible target markets based on similar rationale.Michael made the comments while speaking at the Piper Sandler Global Exchange & FinTech Conference in New York recently. While emphasizing the company’s commitment to the US market, Michael stated that Bakkt is actively seeking markets where it can gain traction and utilize them as a catalyst for growth. The recent acquisition of Apex Crypto, an integrated crypto-trading platform based in the US, further supports Bakkt’s international plans.Leveraging existing partnershipsMichael anticipates leveraging Apex’s existing partnerships with companies such as Webull, M1, Public.com, and Stash to facilitate expansion into international markets. Bakkt aims to accompany these companies as they venture into offering US equities trading, enabling the addition of crypto trading with minimal barriers to entry. However, regulatory concerns have led to the delisting of 25 tokens on the Bakkt platform.Michael highlighted the progress being made in crypto markets outside the US, where regulatory clarity is being achieved more rapidly. He cited the UK’s advancements in clear crypto regulation, Hong Kong’s allowance of trading certain cryptocurrencies, and the EU’s implementation of the MiCA framework for crypto regulation. While supportive of recent regulatory actions in the US, Michael believes that the country needs to provide further clarity, particularly at the federal level.The lack of regulatory clarity in the US has impacted Bakkt’s ability to collaborate with domestic companies. Despite launching with notable partnerships, including Microsoft and Starbucks, Michael revealed that many firms are awaiting clear regulatory guidelines before entering the cryptocurrency space. He noted that trading activity has been slower compared to Bakkt’s custody service, as regulatory clarity plays a significant role in shaping consumer sentiment and providing operational guidelines for trading platforms.Interest in Lightning NetworkIn addition to exploring international expansion, Bakkt is actively considering the use of the Bitcoin Layer 2 Lightning Network for custody and settlement services. Michael explained that this technology has the potential to revolutionize financial services, particularly cross-border payments.Bakkt’s strategic focus on markets with regulatory clarity and its acquisition of Apex Crypto demonstrate the company’s intent to grow beyond the US. By expanding into Hong Kong, the UK, and the EU, Bakkt aims to meet the demand of partners eager to explore these markets.However, the company recognizes the need for the US to provide clearer regulatory guidelines to foster innovation and accelerate adoption within the domestic cryptocurrency industry. With its custody services gaining traction, Bakkt is still optimistic about the potential of trading as regulatory clarity continues to improve. Moreover, Bakkt’s exploration of the Lightning Network showcases its desire to leverage emerging technologies for more efficient financial services.

Atomic Wallet Hacker Uses Lazarus Crypto MixerThe stolen cryptocurrency from the recent $35 million hack of Atomic Wallet is already being moved to a crypto mixer favored by North Korea’s notorious cyber-hacking group.Photo by Micha Brändli on UnsplashSinbad.ioAccording to UK-based crypto compliance analysis firm Elliptic, the funds have made their way to a crypto mixer used by Lazarus Group, a notorious hacker group that focuses on crypto heists which is believed to have direct ties with the North Korean government.On June 5, Elliptic’s Investigations Team revealed that it had traced the funds from the Atomic Wallet hack to the crypto mixer Sinbad.io. Lazarus had previously used the mixer to launder over $100 million in stolen crypto assets.While the exact amount sent to the mixer was not specified, Elliptic noted that the stolen funds were being exchanged for Bitcoin before undergoing obfuscation through the mixer. Additionally, Elliptic reported that Sinbad.io is likely a rebranded version of Blender.io, another mixer extensively used to launder funds by the Lazarus Group. Blender.io has been sanctioned by the US Treasury.Atomic Wallet hackThe hack of several user accounts on Atomic Wallet occurred on June 3, resulting in losses of up to $35 million. News of the issue broke with the following tweet from the project team (which has subsequently been deleted): “We have received reports of wallets being compromised. We are doing all we can to investigate and analyze the situation. As we have more information, we will share it accordingly.”In a follow-up tweet the next day, the team confirmed that it was investigating the matter with the assistance of a number of “leading security companies.”However, Atomic Wallet later downplayed the incident, stating that less than 1% of its monthly active users were affected. The project team was castigated by users for trying to present the hack as a minor incident. One user took to Twitter to call out the Atomic Wallet team for “having the nerve to come to the networks and say that only 1% of wallets were affected.”The Atomic Wallet project is based out of Tallinn, Estonia, having been founded in 2017. It claims to provide a non-custodial decentralized multi-currency crypto wallet. The product supports over fifty coins and two hundred tokens. It also offers atomic swaps between digital assets, while also supporting integrations with instant exchanges such as Changelly, ShapeShift, and others.Roland Säde, the Chief Marketing Officer of Atomic Wallet, assured users that the team is working tirelessly to recover the stolen funds. He emphasized the need to complete the investigation to develop a concrete plan.Despite the ongoing efforts, Säde urged victims to track the illicit transfers and report them to popular crypto exchanges. By doing so, it was thought that may hinder the scammers from exchanging the funds.Crypto hacking menaceLazarus Group hackers have been the bane of the crypto space in recent years. Elliptic released a report last month that identified Japan as having been the country most adversely affected by the North Korean hackers. It’s understood that the estimated $721 million in stolen crypto from Japan-based entities amounts to nearly nine times the value of North Korea’s exports based on 2021 data.While Atomic Wallet is directly reporting the incidents, Säde believes that having more individuals monitoring the hackers’ activities will make it more challenging for them to move the funds undetected. Unfortunately, Elliptic’s recent findings suggest that for many victims, it may already be too late to prevent further misuse of their stolen cryptocurrency.