Top

How will Binance’s criminal case affect its presence in South Korea?

Policy & Regulation·November 27, 2023, 7:48 AM

Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, has reached a settlement with the U.S. government to pay a fine of more than $4.3 billion after the exchange was accused of anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions violations. Co-founder and CEO Changpeng Zhao also pleaded guilty to violating the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires financial institutions to submit documentation to prevent them from becoming mediums for criminal funding. Binance will thus be withdrawing completely from the U.S.

Photo by Vadim Artyukhin on Unsplash

News of this incident has sparked keen interest within the South Korean crypto industry regarding the impact it could have on Binance’s presence and influence in the country.

 

Murky future for Binance as Zhao resigns

Binance allegedly failed to report transactions involving criminal entities such as terrorist groups, ransomware perpetrators and money launderers without implementing a system to prevent such crimes. In particular, organizations like the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades — the armed wing of the Palestinian militant group Hamas — as well as the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and ISIS were found to have utilized Binance as a channel for their funds. Furthermore, the exchange also facilitated transactions with users in sanctioned territories such as Iran, North Korea and Syria.

Zhao has subsequently decided to step down as Binance’s CEO, taking to his X (formerly Twitter) account to state that he believes it is the right move. However, he also emphasized that the U.S. government did not accuse Binance of misappropriating user assets or engaging in market manipulation.

Despite this fiasco, some insights have painted Binance’s future in a positive light. JPMorgan, the largest bank in the U.S., stated that the uncertainty surrounding Binance itself would diminish. “For crypto investors, the prospect of settlement would see the elimination of a potential systemic risk emanating from a hypothetical Binance collapse,” the bank said, according to an article published by digital asset news outlet The Block.

 

GOPAX reaffirms partnership with Binance despite concerns

GOPAX, a Korean fiat-to-crypto exchange that was acquired by Binance in February, also maintained a rather unexpected positive outlook. The acquisition had been followed by a complicated string of events hindering Binance’s full-fledged expansion in Korea, including delayed approval from the country’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) to become a virtual asset service provider (VASP) and multiple leadership changes as a result.

Investors in GOFi — GOPAX’s decentralized finance (DeFi) service — subsequently responded by filing a lawsuit at the end of June, claiming that financial authorities unjustly delayed the approval. They argued that, by approving the request, the FIU would enable Binance to provide the capital that GOPAX had struggled to gather to pay principal and interest payments on GOFi in the wake of last year’s FTX collapse.

However, these circumstances did not sway GOPAX’s decision to work with Binance. “We learned of the news about Binance’s fine through articles from foreign media platforms,” GOPAX said. “Regardless, we are still in a business and technical partnership with the exchange.”

 

Prospects for Binance’s landing in Korea

In contrast to GOPAX’s seemingly positive outlook, the Korean crypto community has voiced mixed opinions about the effect of this development, especially on Binance’s successful entry into the domestic market.

If GOPAX’s VASP approval had been delayed due to concerns about Binance’s suitability as its largest shareholder — incited by the legal risks it posed in the U.S. — the possibility of the approval going through may be more plausible as some of these risks have since been alleviated, said Yoon Seung-sik, an analyst at Seoul-based research firm Tiger Research.

However, Jang Hye-won, an analyst at crypto data research platform Xangle, pointed out that interpretations may differ depending on the reasons behind FIU’s hesitation in approving the GOPAX acquisition. “If the concerns revolved around legal risks, then the path for Binance’s entry into Korea may seem cleared since those risks have been resolved. But if the concerns are about Binance’s capital inflow into the country, then this incident (Binance’s criminal case) will have no effect,” she explained.

On the other end of the spectrum, some experts believe that this incident may have negatively affected the GOPAX acquisition. Hwang Suk-jin, a professor at Dongguk University’s Graduate School of International Affairs & Information Security and a member of the ruling People Power Party’s committee for virtual assets, stated, “Since criminal punishment for Zhao and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) lawsuit are still pending, it’s hard to conclude that legal risks have been completely resolved. Binance paying a fine for money laundering may actually reinforce the FIU’s concerns about legal risks, making the GOPAX acquisition decisively unfavorable.”

These statements come after a public opinion survey conducted earlier in June by Cratos, a Korean blockchain-based polling app, revealed that a 64.6% majority of respondents favored approving the GOPAX acquisition.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Nov 03, 2023

XPLA-Kado Partnership allows fiat-to-crypto transactions for XPLA users

XPLA-Kado Partnership allows fiat-to-crypto transactions for XPLA usersXPLA, the layer 1 blockchain project operated by South Korean gaming company Com2uS Group, announced on Friday (local time) its partnership with Kado, a fiat-to-crypto on/off ramp platform, enabling XPLA users to move between fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies seamlessly.Photo by Ibrahim Boran on UnsplashXPLA available via Visa, MastercardKado simplifies the process of converting between fiat and crypto. Usually, Web3 users have to deal with the inconvenience of using centralized exchanges to make such conversions. But Kado makes this much easier, allowing users to make purchases with either fiat currencies or cryptocurrencies. The platform accommodates an array of more than 20 fiat currencies and supports well-established payment options, including Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, ACH Transfer and Wire Transfer. Moreover, Kado’s services extend across over 150 countries that support Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols.Paul Kim, CEO of XPLA, acknowledged Kado’s contributions to establishing a base for the growth of the Web3 economy. He pointed out that this collaboration will make it simpler and more intuitive for XPLA users to engage with the Web3 economy. Thanks to Kado’s services, XPLA users will now be able to transact with their tokens with greater ease.Vince Dowdle, co-founder of Kado, underscored the importance of this partnership, noting that Kado has recognized XPLA as a frontrunner in shaping the future of Web3 gaming. This recognition comes from XPLA’s proactive stance in acquiring the intellectual properties (IPs) of multiple major games, reflecting a firm belief in the potential of the Web3 content space.Meanwhile, XPLA boasts a diverse roster of validators such as Oasys, Animoca Brands, YGG, Blockdaemon, Cosmostation and LayerZero. It has also onboarded popular games like Summoners War: Chronicles, Minigame Party, Ace Fishing: Crew, Idle Ninja Online and The Walking Dead: All-Stars. With these titles, XPLA is actively working to establish itself as a major hub for Web3 content on a global scale.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Dec 23, 2023

3AC liquidators estimate 46% recovery while BVI court freezes $1B

3AC liquidators estimate 46% recovery while BVI court freezes $1BThe joint liquidators of the now-defunct Singaporean crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) have provided creditors with an estimated 45.74% recovery rate for their claims in the bankrupt estate. Meanwhile, in parallel proceedings in the British Virgin Islands (BVI), a court has frozen $1 billion of founders’ assets.According to The Block, the details were disclosed in a December report to creditors by joint liquidators Russell Crumpler and Christopher Farmer of Teneo, the firm appointed to oversee the liquidation of the failed business.$1.16B in assetsAs of Dec. 18, the estimated value of 3AC’s assets was reported to be $1.16 billion, while claims totaling $2.7 billion are expected to be recognized for distribution. The liquidators highlighted that settlements in litigation against various parties, including DCG, Genesis and BlockFi, increased reported assets by an estimated $292 million. It’s important to note that the BlockFi settlement is still pending approval.A total of 154 claims, valued at $3.4 billion, were filed against the 3AC estate. The report indicates that $200 million of claims were not admitted for distribution, and $322 million in claims have either been rejected or are expected to be rejected. Additionally, $76 million in claims are currently under dispute. The report reveals that initial distributions to creditors are being planned for the first quarter of the upcoming year.Illiquid tokensThe breakdown of assets reveals that a large majority are illiquid tokens, subject to vesting periods, comprising 82% of the total. Only 6% of the portfolio is liquid, while equity and investments account for 6.9% and 4.8% is in cash. These illiquid tokens, totaling $563 million at current prices, consist of 13 different tokens with vesting schedules unlocking assets over the next three years, reaching $200 million by the end of 2024.To date, the liquidators have staked some of these tokens, resulting in $5.4 million in staking rewards. Liquidation efforts, including the sale of $34.5 million worth of liquid tokens and $15 million in NFTs, along with other asset sales, have generated a total of $66 million.Photo by Kemp Fuller on UnsplashFrozen assetsIn a related development, Bloomberg reported on Thursday that a British Virgin Islands court has frozen assets totaling $1.1 billion belonging to 3AC co-founders Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, along with Davies’ wife Kelly Chen. The liquidators filed a claim for insolvent trading against the founders for $1.078 billion, with additional claims against Davies for $66 million and Chen for $4.6 million.Teneo outlined the rationale behind the move in the following statement it made to Decrypt:“The worldwide freezing order has been sought in connection with claims that are being pursued by the liquidators that allege, amongst other things, that the Founders should be held responsible for causing 3AC’s position to deteriorate by an amount that is equivalent to the value of the freezing orders sought.”Su Zhu, who was under house arrest for the last few weeks, became free on Dec. 20. Zhu had been arrested in Singapore on Sept. 29 and sentenced to four months imprisonment, serving two-thirds of his sentence under house arrest.Throughout the bankruptcy proceedings, legal fees have accumulated to $49.7 million while the report suggests ongoing efforts to maximize creditor recovery.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Aug 02, 2023

Bankruptcy Judge Permits Terraform Labs to Subpoena FTX

Bankruptcy Judge Permits Terraform Labs to Subpoena FTXIn a significant development in the bankruptcy case of defunct crypto exchange FTX, a judge has granted Singapore-based Terraform Labs the authority to subpoena information related to its ongoing case brought by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Photo by Bermix Studio on UnsplashHack allegationsTerraform Labs, the blockchain company that developed the Terra blockchain and failed US dollar stablecoin UST, claims that the failures of its algorithmic stablecoin and governance token were the result of an attack from short-sellers, possibly involving Alameda Research (FTX’s sister company).The order, issued by Judge John Dorsey on Monday, allows Terraform Labs to serve subpoenas to FTX Trading and FTX US, aimed at collecting evidence to support its defense against the SEC’s allegations of fraud. According to court filings, lawyers representing the FTX Debtor have not formally objected to the court order.Terraform Labs’ request for subpoena power stems from its belief that short-sellers connected to FTX entities played a role in the failure of the algorithmic stablecoin and governance token, leading to the collapse of the crypto firm. The ability to obtain information from FTX through the subpoenas could be crucial in bolstering Terraform Labs’ defense against the SEC’s fraud charges.UST collapse falloutThe collapse of the UST stablecoin in 2022 contributed to a major market crash, resulting in a significant drop in the prices of many tokens. As a result, the company filed for bankruptcy in November 2022. The Co-Founder of Terra, Do Kwon, is currently serving a four-month sentence in a Montenegrin prison for using false travel documents. He may also face extradition to the United States or South Korea on fraud charges related to Terraform Labs.Motion to dismiss deniedIn a separate high-stakes ruling, US District Judge Jed Rakoff denied Terraform Labs’ motion to dismiss the securities fraud lawsuit filed by the SEC. The judge’s decision allows the SEC’s case against Terraform Labs and Do Kwon to proceed, rejecting defense arguments that the agency lacked jurisdiction and that Terraform’s TerraUSD stablecoin did not qualify as an unregistered security.Judge Rakoff’s ruling is a significant victory for the SEC as it intensifies its enforcement actions against crypto companies involved in allegedly unlawful token sales. He found the collapse of TerraUSD, which lost its dollar peg and incurred a $40 billion loss last year, plausible as a reason to consider the token as a security that should have been registered.Moreover, Rakoff dismissed Terraform’s claim that the SEC lacked the authority to regulate stablecoins without explicit Congressional authorization, asserting that the crypto industry was significant enough to warrant application of the “Major Questions Doctrine.” This doctrine limits agency overreach into major political issues but does not apply to the crypto asset markets.The judge also rebuffed Terraform Labs’ attempts to draw parallels between the Ripple case and its own. In the Ripple case, a different judge ruled that Ripple’s XRP token sales to retail investors did not violate securities laws due to the manner of purchase on secondary markets. Rakoff firmly stated that such distinctions did not apply under the legal Howey test governing whether crypto assets qualify as securities.

news
Loading