Bybit Denies Plans to Leave UK Market

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of Thailand has initiated legal proceedings against Akarlap Yimwilai, the former director and CEO of Zipmex Thailand. Failure to disclose vital informationThe Commission set out its allegations against Yimwilai in a statement published to its website on Thursday. The allegations revolve around Yimwilai's purported failure to disclose vital information during his tenure, resulting in financial losses for Zipmex customers. According to the SEC's investigation, Yimwilai allegedly transferred cryptocurrency from Zipmex Thailand's wallets to overseas digital wallets without prior disclosure to customers.Photo by Olivier Darny on Pexels Unauthorized digital asset movementsThe SEC's findings indicate that customer assets held in Zipmex Thailand's Z Wallet were moved into overseas digital wallets before any official announcement regarding changes in terms and conditions. This conduct, the regulator asserts, contradicts the information provided by Zipmex Thailand, constituting fraudulent misrepresentation. Yimwilai served as CEO of Zipmex Thailand from August 2018 to November 2023, as per his LinkedIn profile. This deceptive action misled users regarding the security of their assets, the SEC claims, prompting the Commission to charge him with violating Section 82 of the Digital Asset Business Operation Act B.E. 2561. The SEC's accusations extend to Zipmex Thailand's submission of inaccurate reports on customer assets and violations of regulatory requirements. The regulator contends that the reports submitted by Zipmex Thailand were inconsistent with independently verified information. Inviting further legal actionIn response to these allegations, the SEC has forwarded charges against Yimwilai to the Office of the Public Prosecutor (OPP) for further legal proceedings. The SEC has also filed a formal complaint against Yimwilai with the Office of the Provincial Crime Suppression Division, indicating a pursuit of additional legal action. The determination or otherwise of legal liability will be a pivotal step in this process, emphasized by the SEC. Zipmex Thailand, a subsidiary of Singapore-based Zipmex under the leadership of Marcus Lim, obtained approval to operate from the Ministry of Finance and SEC in 2020. The company reportedly came under scrutiny from financial regulators over its acquisition by V Ventures in 2023.  V Ventures backed out of the $100 million buyout of the company last year, which would have included the return of customer deposits. It claimed that Zipmex had not lived up to the terms of the buyout contract.On Feb. 2, the Thai SEC directed Zipmex to temporarily suspend its digital asset trading and brokerage services, granting the firm a 15-day period to adhere to regulatory guidelines. Earlier reports had highlighted Zipmex's application for court protection amidst a wave of bankruptcies among crypto lenders. In November 2023, Zipmex proposed a restructuring plan to reimburse creditors at $0.30 on the dollar, encountering resistance from key stakeholders. The initial offer stood at three cents on the dollar, with the potential to increase to 30 cents in the event of optimized capital recovery.

Crypto Features in India-UK Markets DialogueAccording to a press release published by HM Treasury, the 2nd India-UK Financial Markets Dialogue meeting held on Wednesday featured six key themes with crypto featuring among them.©Pexels/SkitterphotoThe event brought officials from both nations together in the first in-person financial dialogue since 2017. While the meeting considered banking, insurance and reinsurance, capital markets, asset management and sustainable finance, it also allotted time to discuss payments and crypto-assets.CBDC knowledge sharingBoth sets of officials discussed the scope for augmenting knowledge on Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC) by way of mutual learning. The officials agreed on the importance of robust global approaches relative to the emergence and development of crypto-assets internationally. The joint statement issued following the meeting revealed that progress relative to the G20 roadmap for enhancing cross-border payments was a matter which was discussed. It’s an item that could have major implications for the use of cryptocurrency in cross border transactions.Global collaborationThe meeting marks another move towards greater global collaboration on policy and regulation relative to digital payment systems and crypto assets. Earlier this month, India’s Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said that the introduction of any new regulations on digital assets needs to be coordinated on a global basis. “The G20 and its members agree that it’s not going to be possible to have an independent, standalone country dealing with crypto assets”, Sitharaman stated at a news conference following a meeting of central bank governors and G20 finance ministers.There’s a growing recognition among politicians, government and central bank officials that decentralized money doesn’t end at a territory’s borders due to its inherently decentralized properties.Taking steps to regulate cryptoWhile on the one hand strategizing as to how digital assets can be best controlled on a global level, India is also taking its own individual steps towards national regulatory action. Recently, it expanded its Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) to include consideration of digital assets. The newly amended PMLA will now deal with the exchange of digital assets for fiat money and vice versa. It also considers safekeeping, transfer and administration relative to cryptocurrency. Furthermore, its broadened scope deals with financial services offered related to virtual or digital assets.Rajagopal Menon, the VP of India’s leading cryptocurrency exchange WazirX, has said that “regulations levied by India have been baby steps toward institutional participation in the crypto exchange.” While market participants in the digital assets space are apprehensive about the regulatory measures that governments and state regulators choose to adopt, so long as the objective isn’t to regulate the innovation out of existence, such developments can have a profoundly positive effect on the digital assets market.There’s no doubt that in line with Menon’s point relative to the Indian context, the same scenario can play out in all digital markets given the application of the right regulatory approach. Institutional investment for the most part has eluded crypto despite many already heralding its arrival in recent years. Institutions move slowly and the only way in which they will be comfortable in working with digital assets is with complete regulatory clarity having been set out.So while some in crypto may be concerned at the mention of global regulatory coordination in respect of digital assets, so long as it doesn’t go too far, greater work towards improved regulatory clarity in the digital assets market can be a catalyst for further adoption and growth in India, the UK and further afield.

Binance Initiates Registration Process for AML Compliance in TaiwanGlobal crypto exchange Binance has set in motion the process of registering under Taiwan’s Money Laundering Control Act, the sole crypto-related regulatory framework currently established in Taiwan.In a confidential gathering on Tuesday, Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) conveyed to numerous domestic crypto service providers that Binance is in the process of applying for registration to ensure compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) regulations, according to a local media report.Photo by Thomas Tucker on UnsplashImportance of AML complianceTaiwan has mandated that virtual asset service providers (VASPs) adhere to its anti-money laundering statutes since the FSC introduced AML rules in July 2021. Outside of these measures, the cryptocurrency industry in the country remains largely unregulated.Speaking to The Block on Friday, an FSC official refrained from confirming whether Binance had already submitted the necessary documentation to register with the regulatory body. However, the official did emphasize the importance of offshore crypto platforms operating in Taiwan abiding by the local AML regulations.While Binance is not yet regulated in Taiwan, it has established a local entity named “Binance International Limited Taiwan Branch (Seychelles),” as per records from the Department of Commerce’s database. The registration particulars indicate that the Taiwanese government endorsed Binance’s company registration on May 12, 2023, with a registered capital of NT$30 million ($944,000) within Taiwan.Cooperation with law enforcementBinance has taken steps to cooperate with local law enforcement agencies to combat cybercrime in Taiwan. In June, the exchange revealed its collaboration with Taiwan’s Criminal Investigation Bureau, leveraging its expertise to assist over 200 Taiwanese law enforcement officers in addressing digital asset-related criminal activities.Damien Ho, Head of Global Partnerships at Binance, remarked in a blog post at the time:“As an increasing number of individuals in Taiwan show interest in cryptocurrency, ensuring a secure and comfortable crypto ecosystem for users becomes crucial.”Growing Asian influenceBinance’s influence is growing across Asia. This month, it officially launched operations in Japan after its acquisition of the local exchange Sakura Exchange BitCoin in November 2022, paving the way for regulatory oversight by the Japan Financial Services Agency (JFSA). Earlier this month, an investigative report carried out by the Wall Street Journal revealed that Binance is thriving in China in spite of the fact that crypto trading is a banned activity there.Regulatory guidelines anticipatedTaiwan’s FSC, which assumed the role of the primary regulator overseeing the crypto industry in March, is currently formulating comprehensive guidelines for trading and payments involving cryptocurrencies for VASPs.The FSC has disclosed plans to release the VASP guidelines by the end of September. Kevin Cheng, a Director at the Taiwan Fintech Association, revealed that the FSC intends to implement a stringent regulatory approach for crypto platforms in Taiwan, similar to its oversight of traditional financial institutions.Cheng noted: “The FSC plans to require VASPs to keep their own crypto assets separate from the clients’ crypto assets and to have accounting firms audit such assets every year.” However, Cheng highlighted the potential difficulty of this requirement, as many accounting firms might hesitate to serve crypto clients due to the specialized nature of crypto-related information.