Top

Korea’s FSS to Collect Public Comments on Financial Statement Guidelines for Virtual Asset Entities

Policy & Regulation·July 24, 2023, 7:32 AM

The South Korean Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) has revealed a set of exemplary financial statements aimed at clarifying the disclosure requirements of virtual asset-related entities. These guidelines have been designed to align with the Korean version of International Financial Reporting Standards (K-IFRS), which was established by the Korea Accounting Institute (KAI).

It was reported earlier this month that the Financial Services Commission (FSC) brought forward these regulations to tackle accounting uncertainties within the blockchain industry.

The main goal of these exemplary guidelines is to help entities provide financial statement readers with essential information regarding virtual assets. This includes details about the reserve amount held by virtual asset issuers and information about the virtual assets held by virtual asset service providers (VASPs).

Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash

 

Presentation sessions

To ensure effective dissemination and understanding of these guidelines, the FSS, KAI, and the Korean Institute of Certified Public Accountants (KICPA) have planned presentation sessions. These sessions will take place from July 26 to August 11, which will involve visits to VASPs, listed companies, and accounting firms. Valuable feedback and suggestions from these stakeholders are anticipated, as the events encourage open two-way communication and welcome participation from anyone interested.

 

Discussion meetings

To further refine the ideas put forward during the presentation sessions, two separate discussion meetings with experts are scheduled for September and October. The recommendations gathered from the industry will undergo a careful review by experts and be thoughtfully incorporated into the guidelines.

The FSS will finalize the guidelines in cooperation with the FSC, and the Securities and Futures Commission under the FSC will review them and give approval for their implementation. This is expected to take place between October and November.

The FSC has stated that these exemplary guidelines are currently in their preliminary stage and open to potential changes during the public comment period. Additionally, companies have the flexibility to make necessary adjustments to these practice guidelines to suit their specific needs and requirements.

 

Issuers, holders, exchanges

The exemplary practice guidelines are specifically targeted at three types of entities: virtual asset issuers, virtual asset holders, and virtual asset trading exchanges.

For virtual asset issuers, providing essential information about their virtual assets is a key requirement. This information should encompass their business models, accounting policies, obligations (e.g. whitepapers), and the current status of their projects. Such details should be disclosed in the annotations of their financial statements. Furthermore, revenue generated from the sales of virtual assets must be recognized, and any changes to their obligations should be duly noted. Moreover, disclosure of the reserved amount of issued virtual assets and their intended usage plan is mandatory.

Companies holding virtual assets must provide information regarding accounting policies, the total value of assets held, the reasons behind their holdings, and any gains or losses incurred. Additionally, holders are obligated to disclose risks associated with virtual assets and their potential impact.

Virtual asset trading platforms, such as exchanges, are mandated to disclose not only their own virtual asset holdings but also those held on behalf of their customers. This disclosure should encompass detailed information about their accounting policies, the total value of assets under their custody, associated risks, and the involvement of third-party custodians. In particular, the platforms must indicate whether they treat customer assets under their custody as assets or liabilities and provide a clear rationale for such classification in the annotations of their financial statements.

More to Read
View All
Markets·

Mar 17, 2025

North Korea becomes major nation-state holder of Bitcoin following hack

While South Korea’s central bank has opted not to accumulate Bitcoin (BTC) at a nation-state level, North Korea has become a major holder of the leading crypto asset, albeit in a very unconventional way. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) is believed to currently be in possession of 13,518 BTC. That’s according to data compiled by the blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence. Arkham has labeled the holding as belonging to the notorious North Korean hacking organization Lazarus Group. It’s been alleged by many observers over recent years that Lazarus is controlled by the North Korean government. Photo by Vasilis Chatzopoulos on UnsplashOn this basis, it would appear that North Korea now has a larger Bitcoin holding than the Bitcoin-friendly jurisdictions of Bhutan and El Salvador. The Kingdom of Bhutan holds 10,635 BTC through Druk Holdings and Investments (DHI), the commercial arm of the Royal Government of Bhutan.  Meanwhile, El Salvador holds 6,119 BTC. Bhutan has been accumulating Bitcoin as a consequence of Bitcoin mining activity carried out by the government in partnership with Singapore-based Bitcoin mining firm Bitdeer and others within the Asian country over recent years. El Salvador made a commitment to buy Bitcoin on an ongoing basis following its recognition of the digital asset as legal tender back in 2021. Based on Bitcoin pricing at the time of writing, Arkham’s data suggests that North Korea currently holds Bitcoin with an overall value of around $1.14 billion. It’s believed that North Korea’s overall holdings have been bumped up recently following a $1.4 billion hack of global crypto exchange Bybit last month. According to crypto data analysis firm Coin Metrics, the hack stands as one of the largest of all time.  Arkham’s data suggests that North Korea now has the third largest nation-state holding of Bitcoin, with the U.S. in first place, with 198,109 BTC, and the UK next with a holding of 61,245 BTC. Besides Bitcoin, the Lazarus Group is understood to be sitting on ETH, BNB, DAI and BUSD worth in the region of $30 million. In the immediate aftermath of the hack, the hackers moved to swap out some of the stolen Ether (ETH) for Bitcoin via the THORChain decentralized liquidity protocol. South Korea not building Bitcoin reserveWhile North Korea appears to have accumulated Bitcoin at the nation-state level through nefarious means, the Republic of Korea’s (South Korea) central bank has given an indication that it currently has no plans to accumulate Bitcoin.  According to a recent local media report, the Bank of Korea (BOK) responded in writing to a query from a Korean parliamentarian, outlining that there is no plan currently to develop a Bitcoin reserve or to stockpile Bitcoin at a national level.  The BOK is understood to have cited Bitcoin’s price volatility as a major concern. Additionally, the central bank outlined that Bitcoin doesn’t conform to the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) guidelines relative to foreign exchange reserve management.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Jun 30, 2023

Julius Baer Expands Crypto Wealth Management Services in Dubai

Julius Baer Expands Crypto Wealth Management Services in DubaiJulius Baer, a renowned Swiss private bank, is making strides in the world of digital assets with the expansion of its crypto wealth management services in Dubai.This move, reported by Bloomberg on Wednesday, represents the bank’s first major crypto product offering overseas. The Middle Eastern subsidiary of Julius Baer, JBME, has announced its intention to apply for a “digital assets license variation” to complement its existing permissions granted by the Dubai Financial Services Authority.If successful, this license variation will empower the company to offer advisory and custodial services for digital assets like Bitcoin, Ether, and other cryptocurrencies.Photo by Sascha Bosshard on UnsplashUAE “key geography”Jonathan Hayes, the head of digital assets development at Julius Baer, has underscored the United Arab Emirates (UAE) as a “key geography” for the bank’s expansion. He points to the region’s substantial economic development as a catalyst for venturing into the Dubai market.Julius Baer has already made strides in the crypto space within Switzerland by offering lending services to select crypto clients. This pioneering service allows customers to leverage their digital assets held by the bank. However, it is currently limited to clients with diversified portfolios that include traditional assets.Attracting international interestThe UAE, along with other individual Emirates in the country, has been actively striving to attract crypto businesses. As US authorities tighten regulations, numerous companies are seeking more crypto-friendly environments to operate in. It started to accept crypto business license applications in April. US crypto exchange Coinbase indicated its interest in locating a base there the following month.In Dubai, prominent cryptocurrency exchanges such as Binance Holdings Ltd., OKX, and Crypto.com have all submitted license applications to the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority. Binance was among one of the first to secure a license while its understood that it may be looking towards the UAE as a strategic base for the company going forward. Meanwhile, another US crypto platform, Gemini, has suggested that it will now work towards obtaining a crypto license in the UAE.Julius Baer has witnessed a broad demand from affluent individual clients ranging in age from 25 to 70, according to Lucia Desmarquest, the Deputy Head of the bank’s central and eastern European division.Having first launched its crypto services in May of the preceding year, Julius Baer currently provides standard advice on digital assets to investors domiciled across 25 countries, including Luxembourg and Singapore.The bank’s wealth management services cover approximately the top 15 cryptocurrencies in the market. Each token undergoes meticulous due diligence and is subject to review by a dedicated panel.This expansion aligns with the broader trend of TradFi firms exploring opportunities in the digital assets space, as the industry continues to evolve and gain traction globally. Julius Baer’s expertise and established reputation position it well to navigate the evolving landscape of crypto wealth management and cater to the needs of its savvy clientele.

news
Policy & Regulation·

May 11, 2023

A Korean Lawmaker’s Crypto Holdings Worth $4.5M Spark Controversy

A Korean Lawmaker’s Crypto Holdings Worth $4.5M Spark ControversySouth Korean lawmaker Kim Nam-kuk, a member of the opposition party Democratic Party of Korea (DPK), has recently come under scrutiny due to his reported possession of 800,000 WEMIX tokens from January to February last year, as reported by the Maeil Business Newspaper. These tokens were worth approximately 6 billion KRW or $4.5 million at the time. While Korean lawmakers are obligated to disclose their wealth, virtual assets are an exception. The disclosure of Kim’s ownership of these tokens has ignited controversy, as it unveiled a wealth magnitude significantly greater than previously understood.Photo by Karolina Grabowska on PexelsTravel Rule regulationA central issue in the unfolding dispute is the source of Kim’s investment in the WEMIX tokens. It has been reported that he purchased a significant amount of these tokens between January and February last year and withdrew the entire sum between February and March before the crypto exchange implemented measures to comply with the Travel Rule regulation. This rule requires that financial authorities be informed of transactions over 10 million KRW ($7,500). After the crypto exchange reported the transactions to the Financial Intelligence Unit of the Financial Services Commission, the government agency requested a warrant to search Kim’s account due to the transactions’ abnormality. However, the court dismissed the request.Jeonse deposit to LG Display sharesIn response to the controversy, Kim took to a YouTube channel on Tuesday to explain his WEMIX token investments. He stated that he had retrieved 600 million KRW ($450,000) after his jeonse contract expired and used the money to purchase LG Display shares. Jeonse a housing rental system in Korea where tenants put up a lump-sum refundable deposit on a rental space for a two-year stay. Kim claims that these LG Display shares later rose in value to 985.7 million KRW ($744,000) in January 2021 and that he used this sum to purchase the tokens.Account balance and WEMIX tokensDespite his explanation, there are still questions surrounding Kim’s sudden increase in his bank account balance. His account balance reportedly increased from 100 million KRW ($76,000) at the end of 2020 to 1.12 billion KRW ($850,000) by the end of 2021, which raised suspicions. If Kim had directed all the money withdrawn from the LG Display shares to WEMIX tokens, it is unclear where the additional $774,000 in his account came from. Kim has reportedly explained to his party’s leadership that he retrieved the principal amount of his investment due to the increase in the WEMIX token price. However, this explanation has not satisfied some critics.Insufficient explanationIn an attempt to address these concerns, Kim shared part of his bank transaction records on Monday. However, this disclosure has fallen short of addressing all the questions that have been raised, such as the precise amount invested in the tokens and their purchase prices. There is still significant public scrutiny and skepticism surrounding Kim’s explanation for his crypto holdings, and it remains to be seen if further disclosures will be made.Kim apologized to the Korean public via Facebook for any disappointment caused, especially amid challenging economic conditions. However, he denied accusations of using undisclosed information or unlawfully acquiring wealth. Kim maintained that all transactions were transparently made using only his own wallets through his real-name bank accounts.Potential insider trading and conflict of interestNevertheless, the public’s acceptance of his explanation is yet to be seen, as questions about his $4.5 million virtual assets persist, particularly given his reported total wealth of around $1.1 million. There are concerns surrounding the possibility of insider trading. Furthermore, Kim’s participation in proposing a bill to defer tax implementation on digital assets has triggered suspicions of a potential conflict of interest.Call for an impartial third partyRecent updates indicate that the prosecution is considering requesting a warrant against Kim in relation to the controversy surrounding his crypto holdings. The Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission is also examining if his participation in proposing the bill constitutes a conflict of interest. It is evident that an impartial third party will need to investigate and analyze all relevant information to resolve this dispute. Until a thorough and unbiased investigation takes place, the public’s concerns and questions are likely to continue.

news
Loading