Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act to Take Effect in July Next Year

In a widening crackdown on overseas crypto exchanges operating illegally in India, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) has issued “compliance show-cause” notices to some of the leading global crypto platforms. In a statement published by the FIU on Thursday, the agency outlined that it has issued compliance show-cause notices to nine offshore virtual digital assets service providers. These include Bitfinex, Bittrex, Binance, Bitstamp, Gate.io, Huobi, Kraken, Kucoin and MEXC Global.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashRequest to block URLsThe FIU has also called on the information ministry to block the URLs of these entities, citing their non-compliance with Anti Money Laundering (AML) and Counter Financing of Terrorism (CFT) frameworks. The FIU is a national agency tasked with receiving, analyzing and disseminating information to enforcement agencies where suspect financial transactions are concerned. The move comes as part of India’s broader efforts to tighten oversight of the digital asset sector. Earlier this year, the government imposed money-laundering provisions on the crypto industry, aligning its regulations with those of other nations. In 2022, local crypto exchanges were dealt a significant blow with the introduction of a transaction tax, leading to a sharp decline in trading volumes. Unregistered platformsAccording to the FIU statement, offshore entities, despite serving a substantial number of Indian users, were operating without proper registration under AML and CFT frameworks. To address this, the FIU issued show-cause notices — a formal request for entities to demonstrate compliance with Indian laws when suspected of misconduct. It emerged earlier this month that in excess of 28 crypto platforms had registered with the FIU. Those compliant platforms were largely native Indian businesses. If the FIU’s recommendation is followed and in due course, URL access to the cited overseas exchanges is blocked, this could potentially be a boon for complaint platforms like WazirX, CoinDCX and ZebPay, at least in the short term. India’s actions against Binance, in particular, are not new. In 2021, the country’s anti-money laundering agency was reportedly investigating Binance’s potential involvement in a case related to betting apps. Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, has faced increasing regulatory pressure globally. In November, the company agreed to a $4.3 billion settlement, pleading guilty to anti-money laundering and U.S. sanction violations. As part of the settlement, CEO Changpeng Zhao agreed to step down. Community reactionNews of this development has caused some disquiet among Indian crypto advocates. However, taking to social media, Web3 marketer Abhinav Kumar wrote: “This isn’t a sign that crypto trading is suddenly going to be banned. . . . It’s a routine thing. The government wants to make sure foreign companies play by the same rules as Indian ones. That’s fair enough! Also remember India has over 20 million crypto investors now.” Leading crypto adoptionDespite regulatory challenges, India has emerged as a significant player in the global crypto market. Chainalysis’ 2022 global crypto adoption index ranked India as the top country by raw estimated transaction volume, second only to the United States. Responding to the growing crypto adoption, India is actively working on a regulatory framework based on joint recommendations from the International Monetary Fund and the Financial Stability Board. The government’s actions underscore its commitment to ensuring compliance within the crypto sector and aligning with international standards.  

Artificial intelligence-driven education technology firm, Genius Group, has announced a plan to buy Bitcoin from the proceeds of damages that the company is pursuing through the courts. In a press release published to the Singapore-headquartered company’s website on June 26, it outlined that the firm’s Board of Directors has approved a distribution plan that would see any potential damages received from litigation that Genius Group is currently embroiled in, divided equally for distribution to shareholders and for the purchase of Bitcoin for the company’s Bitcoin treasury.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashUp to $1 billion in potential damagesGenius Group CEO, Roger Hamilton, commented on the matter, stating:“We are seeking combined damages of over $1 billion. As both lawsuits are being pursued by the Company to recover damages caused by third parties directly to our shareholders, the Board believes that 100% of any proceeds from the successful outcome of these cases should be directly distributed or reinvested for the benefit of shareholders.” On X, Hamilton outlined that there’s no guarantee with regard to how much the company recovers through litigation. However, he added that if justice prevails and the company is awarded $1 billion in damages, that would equal a $7 dividend per share for shareholders and the addition of 5,000 BTC to the firm’s Bitcoin treasury. Last month, the company provided an update on a lawsuit it has taken under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. Initially, $450 million in damages had been pursued but Genius Group amended the lawsuit, raising its claim to $750 million.  The lawsuit is being taken against Peter Ritz and Michael Moe as the controlling officers and directors of LZGI International, and against Michael Carter and John Clayton, in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida. The company alleges that the defendants attempted to defraud Genius Group.  ‘Bitcoin First’Genius Group announced its “Bitcoin First” approach, and the launch of a Bitcoin treasury in November 2024, getting started with an initial purchase of 110 BTC valued at $10 million at that time. In April 2025, a New York court prohibited the company from selling stocks in order to fund the purchase of Bitcoin. Those court-imposed funding restrictions led to the firm selling off a small proportion of the overall Bitcoin that it was holding.  Prior to that prohibition on the purchase of Bitcoin being imposed, Genius Group had expressed the aspiration to build up its Bitcoin reserve to a value equivalent to $100 million. Wading further into the Bitcoin space, the firm acquired blockchain learning platform, XD Academy, in December 2024. On May 22, Genius Group announced that the U.S. Court of Appeals had overturned the ban imposed on the company. With that, it increased its Bitcoin holdings by 40%. As of June 17, the company held 100 BTC, valued at around $10 million. The firm plans to bring forward another lawsuit “alleging naked short selling and evidence of spoofing against certain parties,” with damages being pursued in the region of $250 million. Commenting on the coming of age of Bitcoin and the pursuit of a Bitcoin treasury strategy back in November 2024, Hamilton stated that “we're living in a unique moment in history - one most public companies will miss.” 

Banking Difficulties Remain in Hong Kong for Crypto Start-UpsWhile Hong Kong has demonstrated a very clear crypto-friendly stance over the course of the past six months, crypto start-ups are still struggling with banking in the Chinese autonomous territory.Photo by Manson Yim on UnsplashLicensing backlogAll the signs are that Hong Kong is striving to develop itself as a regional hub for crypto and blockchain related business. Encouraged by that stance, against a background of the United States becoming openly hostile to crypto over that very same time frame, applications are streaming in from international firms to be licensed to operate their businesses in the city.In discussion with crypto start-up applicants, CoinDesk has established that the issue extends to firms that have already obtained a license to operate. To compound matters, the Hong Kong regulator, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), has a shortage of manpower, with just eight officials currently working on the applications of eighty crypto firms.Speaking to that backlog, Amy Yu, APAC CEO for Swiss crypto financial services company, SEBA Bank, stated: “This probably would have been a different story six or nine months ago.”A known problemIt appears that both the SFC and its regulatory peer, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) were aware of the issue and tried to get out ahead of it. Late last month, both regulators convened a meeting with bank officials and virtual asset service providers (VASPs).The objective was to try to forge a path forward such that banks could amend their approach, enabling greater facilitation and acceptance of crypto businesses such that the banks would be more inclined to approve bank account applications from those fledgling businesses.Arthur Yuen, Deputy CEO of the HKMA addressed the matter in a blog post published to the regulator’s website on April 27. Yuen was clear in calling on the banks to enable banking for VASPs:“With the implementation of the regulatory regime for VA [virtual assets] activities in Hong Kong and the strengthening of supervisory regimes in different jurisdictions according to the international standards, and as the banking industry develops a better understanding of the VA industry over time, we expect that regulated virtual asset service providers (VASPs) will be able to successfully apply for a bank account through a reasonable process.”Banker resistanceElaborating on the matter further, it’s clear that Yuen and his colleagues understand the importance of banking in enabling this nascent business sector such that the broader strategy of a pro-crypto business environment is affected in Hong Kong. “To attract businesses from new markets, it is crucial to have high quality financial services, while enhancing corporate access to bank accounts would be one of the key priorities,”he stated.An attendee at that regulator-organized round-table last month said that “It was more like a wish list from the regulator,” and that “whether the banks fully embrace it is another matter.” The issue remains as a major impediment to the ability of crypto start-up companies to operate, Some are being forced to try and work around the stumbling block, relying instead on overseas banking partners.