WEMIX Play Completes Successful Migration to the WEMIX3.0 Mainnet

Singapore Judge Says Crypto Not MoneyIn recent years, legal processes in various jurisdictions worldwide have seen judges comment on whether cryptocurrency is actually money. The latest such determination has been made by Justice Vinodh Coomaraswamy who outlined in a Singapore court that while being a component of financial transactions, cryptocurrencies are not money.The consideration emerged in a recent court hearing at Singapore’s High Court in a case involving the Algorand Foundation and failed Singapore-based hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC). Justice Coomaraswamy’s comments arose due to a discussion in the midst of the court proceedings involving the Judge and counsel representing the Algorand Foundation.©Pexels/EKATERINA BOLOVTSOVASeashells as moneyIn setting out his rationale for the need for 3AC to be wound up, Daniel Chan, a lawyer for the WongPartnership law firm that was representing the Algorand Foundation in the proceedings, told the judge that despite foreign currencies not being recognized as legal tender in Singapore, or used broadly as a medium of exchange within the city state, those foreign currencies are recognized by Singapore law as money. Using that analogy Chan suggested that by implication, the same scenario should be considered where cryptocurrencies are concerned.The judge provided a counterpoint: “What if you had a [community] in the world that used seashells as its internal medium of exchange? Would the Singapore courts have to recognize that as money.” Chan claimed that the judge had used an extreme example although Coomaraswamy remained steadfast in his view, pointing out that seashells had indeed been used as a form of money in the distant past.Coomaraswamy proceeded to dismiss the Algorand Foundation’s winding up application. He acknowledged that the Foundation did have standing in bringing the application. However, as he determined that cryptocurrency couldn’t be classed as money, on that basis he dismissed the application. In conveying his decision, he stated: “The word indebtedness, in my view, must require a debt which is in fiat currency. Determining whether or not a particular intangible, such as cryptocurrency, is money would require a detailed examination of evidence which is not appropriate in the context of insolvency.”Legal tenderThus far, bitcoin has been recognized as legal tender in two countries — El Salvador and the Central African Republic. In 2020, a French court referred to the leading cryptocurrency as money, agreeing that Bitcoin loans can be recognized as customer loans in the same way as loans denominated in fiat currencies. Earlier that year, an Australian court recognized bitcoin as a legally legitimate form of investment. In the United States, a Federal court recognized bitcoin as “money” or “funds” in a prosecution taken against Silk Road website operator Ross Ulbricht.There have been many similar instances in courts globally where judges have had to grapple with the consideration of whether bitcoin and crypto more generally can be regarded as money. Similar to the difficulty authorities are having in regulating cryptocurrency, it’s an issue that in most cases lacks complete clarity and in which we can expect further discussions on, similar to this most recent consideration in the Singaporean high court.

FTX Opts Out of Plan to Sell off FTX JapanThe FTX Debtor that was brought in to manage the bankrupt estate of the failed FTX cryptocurrency exchange has decided to not follow through with a plan to sell off the Japanese business.That’s according to a report by Nikkei on Thursday. In November 2022 a new management team was brought in to restructure the FTX business immediately following the business having filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the courts in Delaware in the United States.Photo by Jezael Melgoza on UnsplashOptimizing value for creditorsThe original plan was to look to sell off subsidiary companies within the group such as FTX Japan, FTX Turkey, and FTX Europe. Those plans have now at the very least been delayed. Nikkei cited an FTX executive who claimed that it’s not so much that plans have been delayed but rather that the FTX Debtor has identified another approach that will likely optimize value for creditors.“They hope to increase the price by selling the entire group, rather than selling subsidiaries in various regions,” Nikkei’s FTX source stated.Rebooting the exchangeThe response from creditors to this news has been largely positive. While the notion of a rebooted FTX business has proven to be controversial within the crypto space, most creditors recognize that the business can provide much greater value for them if it is restarted internationally.Global investment banking firm Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) was brought in by the FTX Debtor in November 2022 to carry out a strategic review of the assets held by the FTX group. In a recent bankruptcy court hearing in Delaware, one of its partners stated that they are currently in the process of inviting bids from interested parties.At that time, PWP indicated that the Debtor was looking to revive the international FTX business. That would likely mean an entity headquartered outside the United States. It remains to be seen what will happen in the case of the FTX US business. Due to an unwelcoming regulatory approach in the US right now, setting up a crypto business there is seen as having additional risk factors.Asian interestA number of weeks ago, the Debtor filed a list of interested parties. The list included a number of high-profile Asian companies, although it’s not clear if their interest lies in the business in its entirety or specific FTX assets.Among them was Japanese telecoms firm Docomo. Tokyo-headquartered global financial services company Nomura also featured. Japan’s largest Ecommerce company, Rakuten, also signed a letter of intent in expressing its interest. FTX Japan had attracted 41 bidders. It’s being speculated that some of these Japanese entities will now bid on the entire business or join consortiums who will do so.FTX Japan solventCreditors of FTX Japan have fared much better than their international counterparts. In the wake of the collapse of the Mt.Gox cryptocurrency exchange in 2014, the Japanese authorities set to work on providing greater protections for customers. As a consequence, FTX Japan was required to ring-fence customer funds. For that reason, Japanese customers have already been given access to their funds.In a recent exchange on Twitter, well-known American investor Mark Cuban pointed out that Japanese regulators had been successful in protecting FTX investors in Japan. Cuban made the point to former US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulator John Reed Stark, underscoring the failure of US regulators in doing so.

China introduces identity verification through RealDID on blockchainThe Chinese government, in collaboration with the Blockchain-based Service Network (BSN), has unveiled plans for the introduction of RealDID, a new digital identity service.Integrating blockchain into public systemsThis platform is set to bring blockchain-based digital identity verification processes into broader use, verifying the digital identities of China’s 1.4 billion people. Such an eventuality would represent a pivotal moment in China’s ongoing efforts to integrate advanced technologies into governance and public administration.The platform is being geared to deliver a spectrum of services, encompassing personal real-name confirmation, encrypted personal data protection and certification. Notably, it will enable private logins, establish business identities and offer personal identification certificate services, coupled with information vouchers on personal identity.Photo by Tamara Gak on UnsplashAnonymous online identityA standout feature of RealDID is its provision for Chinese citizens to register and access online portals anonymously through a Decentralized Identity (DID) address. This feature ensures the privacy of transactions and personal data, addressing global concerns over data security. The introduction of RealDID underscores China’s commitment to harmonizing technological advancement while at the same time, preserving the privacy of the individual.Although the specific roll-out date for RealDID across China’s vast population remains undisclosed, the potential impact of this initiative is monumental. The platform is poised to significantly enhance the security and efficiency of identity verification processes, a critical element in the realm of digital transactions and interactions.RealDID is a strategic component of China’s broader technological vision, aimed at solidifying its position as a global leader in emerging technologies. The nation has been actively investing in and regulating emerging innovations such as artificial intelligence, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and cryptocurrencies. In tandem with these endeavors, China is actively working to reduce its reliance on foreign semiconductor chips by boosting domestic production.BSN FoundationBSN, operated by China’s National Information Center, has forged partnerships with major tech players like China Mobile and China UnionPay, illustrating the collaborative nature of this national initiative. The network was co-founded by Hong Kong’s Red Date Technology. With the network originating in China, last month, the BSN Foundation was established in Singapore, featuring five global members.These included Blockdaemon; Zeeve, a Los Angeles-based blockchain infrastructure automation platform; TOKO, a Hong Kong-headquartered digital asset creation platform; Germany’s GFT Technologies; and Red Date Technology. The five will act as a governing body for the BSN Spartan Network.The unveiling of RealDID by the Chinese government signifies a significant stride in integrating blockchain technology into everyday governance and public services. Leveraging blockchain’s inherent decentralization and security features, RealDID aims to provide a more secure and efficient method of identity verification while upholding user privacy.This move aligns with the global trend of governments exploring blockchain technology for diverse public services, highlighting China’s interest in spearheading technological innovation. As the global landscape evolves, China’s strides in the realm of blockchain-based identity verification serve as a testament to its ongoing interest in the future of digital governance.