Amber Group Targets Trust in Web3 Via Thoughtworks Partnership

CJ ONE to Sell 3,000 NFTs for New Membership ServiceCJ ONE, a lifestyle membership service operated by digital service company CJ OliveNetworks of South Korean conglomerate CJ Group, announced on Tuesday that it will sell 3,000 digital membership NFTs for its new lifestyle service, PRISM ONE. This comes as part of efforts to enhance brand value and boost customer benefits.Photo by Choong Deng Xiang on Unsplash“The PRISM ONE Membership NFT is an important milestone that reflects changes within CJ ONE. As a lifestyle membership, our brand will strive to provide unique experiences in all aspects of our members’ lives,” said Ha Jae-young, Head of Data Marketing at CJ OliveNetworks.Tier benefitsThe NFTs are categorized into four tiers — Basic, Special, Premium, and Prestige — with higher tiers offering more benefits. Depending on the tier, which will be decided randomly, customers can receive up to 10,000 CJ ONE membership points per month and eight times the number of points that they accumulated the previous month over a period of half a year.CJ ONE points can be used like cash at various CJ Group subsidiaries that offer services in culture, dining, shopping, and entertainment, as well as over 30 brand partners such as cafe Mega MGC Coffee, convenience store CU, and refinery company Hyundai Oilbank.10 customers with the Prestige NFT will also be chosen to receive benefits worth KRW 1 million, including welcome packages from CJ The Market, CJ Group’s online grocery shopping mall, and accommodation vouchers to use at Starville, a luxury “glamping” — a portmanteau of “glam” and “camping” — site.Limited sales and resell opportunitiesMinted with a new brand identity design, the NFTs will be sold for KRW 45,000 each on the NFT trading platform Pala starting from 7 PM (Korea Standard Time) on September 13. Customers who participate in an event until September 3 can win a chance to purchase them at a discounted price of KRW 42,000 prior to the public sale. Payments can be made with Polygon tokens (MATIC) or Korean won, and digital wallets Klip and MetaMask are also supported, the company said. In particular, the NFTs can be resold on trading platforms like Pala.

Hong Kong’s HaskKey launches app following regulatory approvalHong Kong-based cryptocurrency firm HashKey has unveiled the HashKey Exchange app, which has received the approval of the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC).News of the app launch emerged following insights shared by HashKey’s Chief Operating Officer, Livio Weng, in an interview with The Block recently.Photo by Manson Yim on UnsplashAppealing to retail tradersThe HashKey Exchange app went live on Wednesday, having received regulatory clearance from Hong Kong’s securities regulator the previous Friday. This achievement allows the app to offer full mobile trading capabilities. Prior to this milestone, HashKey had been primarily catering to professional investors under a voluntary licensing scheme.With the new app, Hongkongers can now conveniently purchase bitcoin and ether, utilizing either Hong Kong dollars or US dollars, directly from their local bank accounts. The app launch is significant as HashKey has become one of Hong Kong’s first fully compliant retail-facing crypto trading platforms. “We’ve recorded large trading volume since we began to serve retail users,” Weng stated. The move aligns with the Hong Kong government’s efforts to bolster the virtual asset sector, which was set in motion one year ago with various policy shifts.These shifts included the introduction of a mandatory licensing scheme for cryptocurrency platforms, enabling them to offer tokens with large market capitalizations to retail traders. The new licensing regulations officially took effect in June, with a one-year grace period, though no new exchanges have been approved to date. HashKey and its rival, OSL, had their previous licenses upgraded in August.Developmental challengesHong Kong has faced several challenges on this journey. While the new regulations are largely in line with international norms, the process has been notably expensive, particularly against the backdrop of a bearish crypto market.The lingering fallout from the JPEX scandal, a cryptocurrency exchange allegedly involved in fraudulent activities, continues to impact Hong Kong’s virtual asset landscape. The SFC first raised concerns about JPEX in mid-September, and since then, it has moved to tighten regulation in response, having received thousands of complaints in relation to JPEX.Despite these challenges, HashKey Group has reported significant activity on its retail platform since its launch in August, with a total trading volume exceeding US$600 million. On October 30, the 24-hour trading volume exceeded US$100 million.Planned token launchIn a move designed to incentivize new users, HashKey Exchange has introduced its platform token, HSK, which is slated to be officially listed on the exchange next year. With a total supply of 1 billion HSK, the company has specified that these tokens will not be initially sold to retail investors, emphasizing its long-term vision for the project.Established in Hong Kong in 2018, HashKey Group operates a digital asset brokerage and a venture capital arm. HashKey Exchange earned the distinction of becoming Hong Kong’s second licensed exchange in November of the previous year, following in the footsteps of OSL. Notably, five companies have applied for the new licensing scheme, according to the SFC, while several other exchanges have expressed their intent to pursue similar approval.

How will Binance’s criminal case affect its presence in South Korea?Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, has reached a settlement with the U.S. government to pay a fine of more than $4.3 billion after the exchange was accused of anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions violations. Co-founder and CEO Changpeng Zhao also pleaded guilty to violating the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires financial institutions to submit documentation to prevent them from becoming mediums for criminal funding. Binance will thus be withdrawing completely from the U.S.Photo by Vadim Artyukhin on UnsplashNews of this incident has sparked keen interest within the South Korean crypto industry regarding the impact it could have on Binance’s presence and influence in the country.Murky future for Binance as Zhao resignsBinance allegedly failed to report transactions involving criminal entities such as terrorist groups, ransomware perpetrators and money launderers without implementing a system to prevent such crimes. In particular, organizations like the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades — the armed wing of the Palestinian militant group Hamas — as well as the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and ISIS were found to have utilized Binance as a channel for their funds. Furthermore, the exchange also facilitated transactions with users in sanctioned territories such as Iran, North Korea and Syria.Zhao has subsequently decided to step down as Binance’s CEO, taking to his X (formerly Twitter) account to state that he believes it is the right move. However, he also emphasized that the U.S. government did not accuse Binance of misappropriating user assets or engaging in market manipulation.Despite this fiasco, some insights have painted Binance’s future in a positive light. JPMorgan, the largest bank in the U.S., stated that the uncertainty surrounding Binance itself would diminish. “For crypto investors, the prospect of settlement would see the elimination of a potential systemic risk emanating from a hypothetical Binance collapse,” the bank said, according to an article published by digital asset news outlet The Block.GOPAX reaffirms partnership with Binance despite concernsGOPAX, a Korean fiat-to-crypto exchange that was acquired by Binance in February, also maintained a rather unexpected positive outlook. The acquisition had been followed by a complicated string of events hindering Binance’s full-fledged expansion in Korea, including delayed approval from the country’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) to become a virtual asset service provider (VASP) and multiple leadership changes as a result.Investors in GOFi — GOPAX’s decentralized finance (DeFi) service — subsequently responded by filing a lawsuit at the end of June, claiming that financial authorities unjustly delayed the approval. They argued that, by approving the request, the FIU would enable Binance to provide the capital that GOPAX had struggled to gather to pay principal and interest payments on GOFi in the wake of last year’s FTX collapse.However, these circumstances did not sway GOPAX’s decision to work with Binance. “We learned of the news about Binance’s fine through articles from foreign media platforms,” GOPAX said. “Regardless, we are still in a business and technical partnership with the exchange.”Prospects for Binance’s landing in KoreaIn contrast to GOPAX’s seemingly positive outlook, the Korean crypto community has voiced mixed opinions about the effect of this development, especially on Binance’s successful entry into the domestic market.If GOPAX’s VASP approval had been delayed due to concerns about Binance’s suitability as its largest shareholder — incited by the legal risks it posed in the U.S. — the possibility of the approval going through may be more plausible as some of these risks have since been alleviated, said Yoon Seung-sik, an analyst at Seoul-based research firm Tiger Research.However, Jang Hye-won, an analyst at crypto data research platform Xangle, pointed out that interpretations may differ depending on the reasons behind FIU’s hesitation in approving the GOPAX acquisition. “If the concerns revolved around legal risks, then the path for Binance’s entry into Korea may seem cleared since those risks have been resolved. But if the concerns are about Binance’s capital inflow into the country, then this incident (Binance’s criminal case) will have no effect,” she explained.On the other end of the spectrum, some experts believe that this incident may have negatively affected the GOPAX acquisition. Hwang Suk-jin, a professor at Dongguk University’s Graduate School of International Affairs & Information Security and a member of the ruling People Power Party’s committee for virtual assets, stated, “Since criminal punishment for Zhao and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) lawsuit are still pending, it’s hard to conclude that legal risks have been completely resolved. Binance paying a fine for money laundering may actually reinforce the FIU’s concerns about legal risks, making the GOPAX acquisition decisively unfavorable.”These statements come after a public opinion survey conducted earlier in June by Cratos, a Korean blockchain-based polling app, revealed that a 64.6% majority of respondents favored approving the GOPAX acquisition.