Unprecedented surge in trading volumes on HashKey exchange

During a National Policy Committee audit, South Korean lawmakers pressed financial regulators on their oversight of the domestic crypto market, focusing on Binance’s acquisition of local exchange Gopax, risks from order-book sharing with foreign platforms, and weaknesses in anti–money laundering (AML) controls.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashQuestions over Gopax compensationAccording to Kuki News, Democratic Party lawmaker Min Byeong-dug has urged regulators to reach out to Binance for details on its plan to compensate Gopax creditors following its acquisition of the local exchange. One of the nation’s five fiat-to-crypto exchanges, Gopax suspended withdrawals from its GoFi service, a yield-bearing product, in November 2022 after the collapse of the Bahamas-based FTX crypto exchange and the bankruptcy of Genesis, a U.S.-based crypto financial services firm. Citing investor losses estimated at 10 billion to 50 billion won (about $7 million–$35 million), Min said Binance had agreed to cover the shortfall as part of its cashless acquisition of Gopax, but full repayment to Korean users remains unresolved. He noted that the deal had faced delays due to concerns raised by the Financial Services Commission’s (FSC) Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) over Binance’s eligibility as a major shareholder, and urged the FSC and FIU to ensure a clear and timely resolution for affected investors. Concerns over order-book sharingPeople Power Party (PPP) lawmaker Lee Heon-seung raised additional concerns about order-book sharing tied to the Binance–Gopax deal, warning it could create regulatory blind spots. According to Dailian, he asked the FIU about risks such as possible gaps in AML oversight at foreign exchanges and the potential exposure of Korean user data. FIU head Park Gwang said inadequate AML systems at overseas platforms can hinder fund tracing. He noted that separate approval is required before a domestic exchange can share its order book with a foreign platform, adding that no such request was under discussion. Park said the FIU would closely examine the matter and ensure protection of personal data. Lee also questioned how effectively regulators can supervise the crypto market given its scale, pointing to the Bithumb exchange as an example, where he had raised similar concerns about order-book sharing. Bithumb serves about 3.8 million users and records roughly 605 trillion won (approximately $426 billion) in annual trading volume. He said order-book sharing with major global exchanges such as Binance could complicate AML compliance, data protection, and regulatory oversight, and called for stronger enforcement. In response, Park said that the agency would ensure proper supervision to address these risks. Allegations of AML loopholes and illicit useAnother PPP lawmaker, Kim Jae-sub, flagged a potential AML loophole involving Binance, saying the exchange had allegedly been used by Cambodia’s Prince Group, which is linked to fraudulent schemes to conceal illicit funds. Last week, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a civil forfeiture complaint to seize roughly 127,271 Bitcoin linked to Prince Group’s operations, marking the largest seizure in its history. Kim also cited past allegations connecting Binance to illicit transactions involving Hamas and North Korea, and said the exchange’s founder faces related charges. He urged the FSC to conduct a thorough examination to determine the extent of any involvement if the claims prove accurate. As the parliamentary audit continues, lawmakers from both parties are pressing regulators to clarify standards, tighten oversight, and prioritize investor protection while maintaining fair and predictable rules for market participants. 

Singapore-headquartered crypto exchange platform Crypto.com has boosted its standing amongst its peers by achieving the largest spot crypto trading volume for the month of July where USD-supported exchanges are concerned. According to data published by The Block, the exchange platform achieved $68.85 billion in spot trading volume among USD-supported exchanges in July out of an overall total of $178.84 billion. American exchange platform Coinbase was next in the rankings, with a July trading volume total of $63.97 billion.Photo by Alexander Grey on UnsplashInstitutional client boost It’s understood that the uptick in trading volume experienced by the exchange platform is as a consequence of an increase in the number of institutional clients using Crypto.com’s trading services.  Giuseppe Giuliani, the managing director of Crypto.com, told Cointelegraph that more institutional clients are using the platform due to an improved product offering, together with stronger market conditions. Giuliani stated: “This growth has been primarily driven by the acquisition of new clients on the platform, both large institutions and advanced retail traders, and is being supported by stronger market conditions in 2024.” Giuliani told The Block that growth on the platform has played out over the medium term, stating:  "We have seen incremental market share growth month on month over the last 18 months.” Driving Bitcoin unit price Institutional adoption has been a developing theme in 2024. Some analysts have pointed to its importance in the attainment of an ever higher Bitcoin unit price. Crypto market analyst Willy Woo has suggested recently that a 3% allocation by institutions could lead to a Bitcoin unit price of $700,000. In its most recent quarterly report, global investment bank Canaccord Genuity outlined that there is growing institutional adoption relative to spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). The launch of spot Ethereum ETF products in the U.S. last month is also understood to have helped towards an improved monthly trading volume for Crypto.com. Giuliani stated: “In the week of July 21 during which Ether ETF was launched, we have seen double-digit growth in our exchange’s Ether spot and perpetual volume week-on-week, building on consecutive weeks of robust volume growth.” Furthermore, the exchange platform claims to have seen increased interest and market participation from TradFi firms. Growing through licensing and sponsorship Crypto.com has attempted to further its market impact worldwide, including in Hong Kong, having applied for a trading license in the Chinese autonomous territory in February, and succeeding in that endeavor more recently according to subsequent reports. It received a license from the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in 2022, with the FCA awarding the company a further license, an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license, in 2023. High profile sports sponsorships is another marketing strategy the firm has pursued in recent years. The company has claimed to be reaping the rewards of these deals, which it has made in Formula 1 (F1) motor racing and the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC).

Polymarket activity under scrutiny in Taiwan due to election contractsTaiwanese law enforcement is currently delving into the activities of online influencers and community members promoting Polymarket contracts related to the upcoming presidential election which is due to be held on Jan. 13.Polymarket is a New York-based Ethereum-centric prediction market. The platform runs on the Ethereum layer-2 scaling solution network Polygon. The project invites platform users to bet on the outcomes of a broad spectrum of events, ranging from politics to entertainment.Users deposit USDC stablecoin, choose an event to bet on and purchase “outcome shares” through USDC. The user has the ability to trade those shares anytime before the resolution of the contract.Photo by Ethan Lin on UnsplashPossible election law violationsThe Taiwanese investigation came to light in a report by Taiwan-based crypto publication BlockTempo, which was published last week. The investigation comes as concerns arose about potential violations of Taiwan’s Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act, which explicitly prohibits gambling on election outcomes.Multiple influencers and crypto community members have reportedly been subpoenaed for their involvement in Polymarket contracts, allowing users to place bets on the January election. At present, the betting pool for the election holds over $300,000, with a market prediction favoring the Democratic Progressive Party’s Lai Ching-te, also known as William Lai, with a 78% chance of winning.However, the legality of such betting activities is in question under Article 88–1 of Taiwan’s election law. It stipulates that anyone gambling on the outcome of an election or recall in a public place or a place open to the public may face imprisonment, short-term detention or a fine of up to NT$100,000 ($3,196.85).Sherman Lin, an attorney at Taipei-based Lin & Partners, emphasized the seriousness with which law enforcement views gambling activities related to presidential elections in Taiwan. He explained that broad legal interpretations under the Presidential Election and Recall Act have led to investigations and convictions of gambling website operators targeting Taiwanese gamblers. Lin stated:“Law enforcement agencies in Taiwan are vigilant in investigating any gambling activities related to presidential elections.”“Broad legal interpretations have been applied to gambling crimes under the Presidential Election and Recall Act, leading to investigations and convictions of gambling website operators in Taiwan targeting Taiwanese gamblers,” he added.Prohibited in United StatesComparing the situation to the United States, where gambling on election outcomes is illegal in most states, Lin noted that enforcing such regulations often falls under the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Polymarket’s Terms of Use explicitly prohibit usage by U.S. persons.Despite potential legal consequences for gambling activities in Taiwan, including participation, promotion and platform hosting for betting pools like Polymarket, Lin pointed out that enforcing actions against overseas entities poses jurisdictional challenges. Taiwan’s legal reach is primarily limited to domestic actors, creating complexities in addressing decentralized platforms like Polymarket.Lin suggested that law enforcement may focus on online influencers who promoted the Polymarket contract, as seen in previous cases involving the collapse of the unlicensed crypto exchange JPEX in Hong Kong.Moreover, while there are legal precedents for pursuing centralized entities organizing election gambling, Lin highlighted that no established legal precedent in Taiwan currently exists for decentralized platforms organizing election betting.