Token pre-sale for Web3 mental health dApp sells out in nine hours

The Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB), a policy bureau attached to the government of the special administrative region of Hong Kong, has released a new digital assets policy statement, incorporating its “LEAP” framework for the digital assets industry within the city. The document, outlining the government’s objectives and guiding principles relative to the digital assets sector, builds on its first policy statement for the industry which it published in October 2022.Photo by Harry Shum on PexelsA ‘LEAP’ towards an integrated digital assets ecosystemThe FSTB suggests that this new policy statement builds upon foundational initiatives pioneered through the initial policy statement, asserting that “Hong Kong is poised to 'LEAP' towards a trusted, sustainable, and deeply integrated [Digital Assets] ecosystem embedded within the real economy.” The government agency also suggested that this “Policy Statement 2.0” also builds on the “ASPIRe” digital asset regulatory roadmap introduced by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in February, outlining the next phase of digital asset sector development in Hong Kong. Strengthening global hub statusThe government has set out to home in on strategic measures to bring about greater liquidity in digital asset markets and diversify digital asset product offerings, while strengthening the Chinese autonomous territory’s position as a global hub for the digital asset sector. “LEAP” is an acronym for the proposed initiatives that underpin the new framework, including: - Legal and regulatory streamlining- Expanding the suite of tokenized products- Advancing use cases and cross-sectoral collaboration- People and partnership development The framework focuses heavily on the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA), with particular emphasis on bond tokenization. In February 2023, Hong Kong pioneered the issuance of the world’s first-ever tokenized government green bond. Building on that, it now seeks to bring about the regularization of the issuance of tokenized government bonds. The Hong Kong government would also like to see tokenization efforts expanding into “a broader range of assets and financial instruments.” It cited sectors such as precious metals, non-ferrous metals and renewable energy as candidates for tokenization. Promoting tokenized ETFsThe authorities are also encouraging tokenized exchange-traded funds (ETFs), with plans to introduce a stamp duty waiver for these products as an incentive. Additionally, the Hong Kong government is interested in nurturing the development of secondary market trading of such tokenized ETF products, whether that’s through digital asset trading platforms or other channels. The framework considers the further development of stablecoins. The city’s new licensing regimen for stablecoin issuers commences on Aug. 1. The FSTB maintains that stablecoins have the potential “to transform payments, supply chain management, and capital market activities by offering a cost-effective and efficient alternative to traditional systems.” In order to capitalize on this potential, the Hong Kong government, together with the city’s regulators, intends to enable licensed stablecoin issuers in the city “to explore and implement different stablecoin use cases.” Cyberport, a Hong Kong business park and digital technology incubator that hosts in excess of 1,650 startups, will also extend its support through its incubation ecosystem to further the objectives set out in the Hong Kong government’s new digital assets policy statement.

CoinFLEX founder: creditors not to interfere with OPNXMark Lamb, the co-founder of failed crypto derivatives and yield platform CoinFLEX, has asserted that creditors of the company cannot interfere with OPNX, a Seychelles-incorporated company that Lamb has co-founded with Kyle Davies and Su Zhu, the founders of failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashFallout following writIt emerged in October that a group of CoinFLEX creditors had filed a writ of summons in the High Court of Hong Kong, claiming that OPNX, a new crypto bankruptcy claims trading platform linked to CoinFLEX, was established using CoinFLEX assets without their consent. While incorporated in the Seychelles, CoinFLEX ran its operations from Hong Kong.The writ alleges that Mark Lamb misappropriated assets, diverted clients and business opportunities and engaged in actions harmful to creditors during his tenure.The creditors argue that Lamb, while serving as CoinFLEX’s CEO, simultaneously devoted time and effort to setting up OPNX, contrary to his responsibilities. The allegations include diverting assets, falsely representing OPNX’s association with CoinFLEX creditors, disclosing confidential trade secrets and soliciting employees to move to OPNX.The legal action — filed by two companies, Liquidity Technologies and Liquidity Technologies Software — claims that OPNX’s formation was unauthorized and harmful to CoinFLEX creditors. Despite CoinFLEX’s terms of service requiring dispute resolution through arbitration in Hong Kong, the allegations have not been proven in the High Court of Hong Kong.Lamb addresses ‘Twitter FUD’In response to these creditor actions, earlier this week, Lamb took to X (formerly Twitter) to address what he termed as “Twitter FUD.” Lamb wrote:“The Hong Kong court ruled that the few CoinFLEX creditors behind recent ‘FUD’ must not disrupt or interfere with OPNX in any way — and their legal counsel has subsequently stopped representing them.”Lamb added that he hoped that CoinFLEX’s 4,800 creditors would choose the path that he has proposed on the basis that it “maximizes value.”OPNX has defended its position, emphasizing that it provided an opportunity for creditors to sell their claims on the exchange for quick cash, benefiting them. Davies and Zhu have pledged to donate their share of the profit to 3AC creditors.In February, OPNX CEO Leslie Lamb, Mark Lamb’s wife, announced the rebranding of CoinFLEX to Open Exchange (OPNX). However, the writ of summons claims that OPNX is a separate entity not authorized by CoinFLEX creditors. Leslie Lamb followed up in April by claiming backing from well-known entities in crypto venture capital, only for many of those mentioned to immediately refute such claims.The dispute has also implicated Roger Ver, a well-known character in the crypto space otherwise referred to as “Bitcoin Jesus.” Ver, a significant individual customer, was accused of defaulting by CoinFLEX. Ver denied defaulting and claimed that CoinFLEX used his trading positions against him, leading to a court-ordered arbitration.OPNX, since its launch in April, has obtained a Lithuanian license for spot trading in the EU and currently processes substantial daily trading volumes. Criminal and civil proceedings against OPNX co-founders Davies and Zhu are ongoing. The situation remains fluid as the legal dispute unfolds.

Subreddit Token Price Slide Following SurgeReddit’s subreddit community tokens, Moon and Brick, having experienced a remarkable surge in prices last week fueled by a significant increase in trading volume, have taken a downward trajectory, plummeting in price.Photo by Mike Petrucci on UnsplashCrypto.com token listingThe Moon token, associated with Reddit’s r/CryptoCurrency community boasting over 6.5 million members, shot up from approximately $0.09 to nearly $0.58 on July 19, just after Singapore trading platform Crypto.com listed the token.Concurrently, trading volume spiked to around $3 million on Wednesday, marking an impressive boost.Similarly, the Fortnite subreddit community token, Brick, which Crypto.com distributes as a reward to contributors of r/Fortnite, also witnessed a substantial price surge. The token’s value surged from $0.01 on July 17 to approximately $0.10 on July 19, according to data from CoinGecko.Surge acknowledgedIn response to the sudden price surges, Crypto.com released a note early on Monday, acknowledging the surge both tokens had experienced recently. However, in a swift turn of events, both tokens experienced a significant downturn in the past 24 hours, with their prices plummeting by over 20%.As of midday (ET) on Monday, Moon was trading at $0.33, while Brick was valued just under $0.05, as reported by CoinGecko data. Moreover, trading volumes for both tokens have significantly contracted during this period of volatility. Moon’s volume shrank from over $1 million on July 23 to approximately $200,000 on Monday. On the other hand, Brick’s volume saw an even more drastic decrease, falling from approximately $210,000 on July 23 to a mere $26,000 on Monday.Terms of service changeMarket analysts speculate that the recent change in Reddit’s Terms of Service might have been the catalyst for the initial price increases. Reddit’s alteration of its Terms of Service on July 16 to permit users to trade community tokens and avatars potentially triggered the surge in token prices. It appears that Web2 centralized virtual goods such as coins and awards are making way for tradable Web3 community points.Speculating on the token price surge, Bobby Ong, the Co-Founder and COO of Malaysia-headquartered cryptocurrency data aggregator CoinGecko, wrote via Twitter last week: “Both tokens increased at the speculation of the changes coming at Reddit. No one knows exactly what is happening but Reddit deprecating Web2 Coins & Awards while allowing trading of their Web3 CPs could be something to monitor in the coming months.”Despite the recent downturn, the overall crypto space remains highly dynamic and unpredictable. Events such as the listing of tokens on prominent trading platforms can cause rapid price fluctuations. As always, that scenario makes it essential for investors to approach these assets with caution.While Moon and Brick may have encountered a sharp decline, the cryptocurrency market, in general, has proven its resilience and ability to rebound with Bitcoin currently holding a unit price of $29,125. As the market continues to evolve and gain wider acceptance, investors will need to continue to exercise caution and consider the volatility inherent in digital assets.