Vietnam sets out blockchain strategy with goal of regional leadership by 2030

$100M Pyramid Scheme Linked to Prominent Chinese Filecoin ProjectA courtroom showdown currently playing out in the People’s Court of Pingnan County in northeastern Fujian province in China is laying bare an intricate pyramid scheme entwined with one of China’s flagship ventures in the Filecoin ecosystem.The lawsuit thrusts five defendants into the spotlight, alleging their orchestration of an expansive pyramid scheme under the guise of their enterprise, Shenzhen Space-Time Cloud Company. The operation is purported to have siphoned off millions of dollars, leaving in its wake a trail of financial wreckage.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashAggressive project marketingAccording to a local media report published on Monday, the saga began in June 2018 when Lai Mouhang and Lai Moujun established the Space-Time Cloud Company. Subsequently, co-defendants Hu and Liang joined the ranks in the following months. However, it wasn’t until September 2019 that Lai Mouhang escalated the company’s operations, leveraging the ipfs.cn domain to aggressively market and peddle investments linked to distributed storage technology and Filecoin’s intricate economic model.Central to Filecoin’s model is its block reward system, where miners validating new blocks receive Filecoin tokens (FIL) as a reward. In a stunning revelation, the prosecution claims that Lai Mouhang and his accomplices crafted a scheme mirroring this economic structure.Their brainchild, the filpool.io platform, served as a conduit for joint mining, masquerading as a storage server vending operation for FIL mining. This platform, intrinsically linked to Space-Time Cloud Company, allegedly formed the epicenter of the defendants’ fraudulent maneuvers.Almost 60,000 usersThe gravity of the scheme becomes evident when considering the staggering numbers: a reported 57,122 members registered on the filpool.io platform and an additional 143 partners on the bpool.io platform, a sibling project of Space-Time Cloud Company. These platforms collectively amassed a jaw-dropping RMB 607 million ($83 million), alongside RMB 62 million in diverse cryptocurrencies.The modus operandi of the defendants was rooted in enticing participants with rosy prospects of exponential profits. By acquiring a minimum of 8 terabytes of cloud computing power, individuals could attain bronze membership status or higher, unlocking the ability to further recruit participants. Unsurprisingly, the magnitude of returns correlated directly with the size of investments and the recruitment spree — classic hallmarks of a pyramid scheme.The prosecution contends that the defendants exploited these platforms as bait for participants, perpetuating the myth of high returns. This alleged deception led to substantial financial losses for many unsuspecting victims. Furthermore, these actions purportedly sowed discord and upheaval in both economic and social spheres, potentially transgressing criminal law boundaries.As the investigation into this convoluted case unfurls, its implications resonate far beyond China’s territorial confines. The intertwining of cryptocurrency, blockchain, and pyramid schemes punctuates the ever-evolving narrative of financial crime. The case highlights the importance of vigilance and regulatory scrutiny in an innovative industry that has more than its fair share of bad actors.

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.

Laser Digital, the crypto arm of Nomura, Japan’s largest investment bank and brokerage group, in collaboration with WebN Group, has unveiled Libre, an institutional Web3 protocol powered by Polygon technology. WebN Group is an incubation hub for fintech and Web3 innovators. It’s backed by Laser Digital and Alan Howard, the co-founder of alternative investment management platform, Brevan Howard.Photo by Shubham's Web3 on UnsplashFocusing on asset tokenizationLibre leverages asset tokenization and smart contracts, aiming for regulatory-compliant issuance and management of alternative investments. According to a statement, the protocol is built using the Polygon Chain Development Kit (CDK), facilitating the development of purpose-built, zero knowledge-powered Layer 2 blockchains on Ethereum. Dr. Avtar Sehra, the founder of Libre, has been actively involved in real-world asset (RWA) tokenization since 2014. His previous experience includes founding the UK FCA-licensed tokenization platform Nivaura. The protocol's applications extend beyond primary issuance services, with additional use cases such as collateralized lending and automated rebalancing of private investment portfolios. In a press release which was published on Wednesday, Sehra commented on the project:”While our MVP objective is to increase AUM by launching the primary issuance service and driving distributor integrations, we are also working closely with our partners and clients on our 2024 product roadmap, which includes collateralized lending and automated portfolio rebalancing — building the future of wealth APIs.” Libre's anticipated launch is in Q1 2024, with investment management firms Brevan Howard and Hamilton Lane poised to become the first issuers on the platform. The industry has shown growing interest in leveraging blockchain technology to revolutionize the distribution and accessibility of alternative asset funds. Making blockchains ‘mainstay financial rails’Polygon’s Indian co-founder Sandeep Nailwal outlined on a social media post on Wednesday the relevance of a dedicated network relative to real-world assets. He wrote:”RWAs have the potential to make blockchains mainstay financial rails at a global scale. I have always believed that RWAs would need their own regulated, compliant environment. Public shared chains like Ethereum mainnet, or L2 mainnets are intrinsically permissionless and not the perfect for many types of RWAs.” With that outlook in mind, Nailwal believes that Libre showcases the potential of blockchain technology to unlock new opportunities for investors globally. Natalie Smith, Head of Strategy at Brevan Howard, said, “the tokenization of funds allows us to offer investors a new way to access our strategies, providing them with optionality, and further develops our platform to serve client needs.” Competing projectsLibre is not the sole project exploring the tokenization of funds. In November, JPMorgan's Onyx collaborated with asset and wealth managers WisdomTree and Apollo, along with various blockchain technology providers, on a blockchain interoperability proof-of-concept for investment portfolio management. SC Ventures, the Singapore-based investment and innovation arm of Standard Chartered, also entered the tokenization space by launching Libeara, its tokenization platform. The SGD Delta Fund, a tokenized Singapore-dollar government bond fund, recently received an AA rating from Moody's after becoming the first fund to use Libeara. The first tokenization platforms have tended to be run on private blockchains. It will be interesting to watch the development of Libre as it’s the first time a financial institution-focused layer 2 network is being built, with final settlement on the Ethereum blockchain.