Regulator in Tokyo moves to ban insider trading in crypto market

Bank of Korea Anticipated to Conduct Retail CBDC Pilot TestThe Bank of Korea (BOK), the South Korean central bank, is reportedly planning to conduct a pilot test for distributing retail central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) to the general public via commercial banks, according to a report by local news outlet IT Chosun.Photo by Zequn Gui on UnsplashBOK’s CBDC initiativesIn 2020, the BOK initiated a pilot test for CBDC issuance, establishing a platform for both online and offline payments. Last month, the BOK announced the successful completion of a CBDC simulation to ensure connectivity with commercial banks.A representative from a commercial bank stated that the BOK would recruit banks next month for a retail CBDC experiment. The pilot test for this retail CBDC is projected to take place next year.Wholesale and retailThe upcoming CBDC pilot test aims to cater to the retail needs of ordinary citizens. There are two types of CBDCs: wholesale CBDCs, which facilitate payments between financial institutions, and retail CBDCs, which are accessible to all economic entities, including the general public.The successful execution of the retail CBDC pilot test requires close collaboration between the BOK and commercial banks. A banking official highlighted that while the BOK can outline the distribution framework for wholesale CBDCs, it may not be the most suitable entity to design the intricate distribution scheme for retail CBDCs.Last year, 15 financial institutions, including five commercial banks (KB Kookmin Bank, Shinhan Bank, Hana Bank, Woori Bank, and NongHyup Bank), participated in an inter-institutional CBDC linkage experiment with the BOK. The BOK is expected to select banks from among these participants to design the distribution structure of retail CBDCs and proceed with a pilot test.Speculative timelineAn official from a commercial bank that took part in the BOK’s prior experiment said that the Korean central bank has recently maintained close communication with commercial banks and successfully completed the infrastructure linkage test for CBDCs. The official also mentioned that the retail CBDC test is expected to see its completion this year, potentially enabling the commencement of retail CBDC implementations in the private sector next year.However, a BOK official expressed a more cautious stance. The official stated that the BOK has recently expanded its digital currency research team and plans to conduct further research in the future. Specific timelines and plans for the retail CBDC test could not be disclosed at this time.Other countriesDifferent countries have adopted varying approaches to CBDC research and implementation, depending on their economic conditions. Developing nations have been promoting CBDC issuance to facilitate financial inclusion, while developed countries have prioritized the stability of their financial systems.However, as cash payments decline and private digital currencies continue to proliferate, developed countries are also turning their attention to retail CBDCs. For instance, the Bank of England collaborated with the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) to establish and experiment with retail CBDC prototype infrastructure. Similarly, the European Union (EU) has released draft legislation to introduce the digital euro as a legal tender within the Eurozone.

India’s RBI Cites Stablecoin Risks With Call for Global RegulationIn its latest Financial Stability Report released on Wednesday, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) expressed concerns about the potential harm stablecoins could inflict on emerging markets and developing economies (EMDE).Photo by rupixen.com on UnsplashPerennial criticThe RBI has been a consistent critic of cryptocurrencies, but particularly so in the case of stablecoins, from an EMDE perspective. However, the lack of authenticated data and inherent data gaps in the crypto ecosystem hindered a comprehensive assessment of financial stability risks.According to the report, one of the ways stablecoins could pose a threat to an EMDE is through currency substitution. Since the underlying assets of stablecoins are generally denominated in freely convertible foreign currencies, the widespread adoption of stablecoins could lead to currency mismatches on the balance sheets of banks, firms, and households, resulting in an increased risk to the economy.Monetary policy headacheFurthermore, the presence of stablecoins in the economy could create challenges for an EMDE’s central bank in setting domestic interest rates and managing liquidity conditions. The decentralized, borderless, and pseudonymous characteristics of crypto-assets make them potentially attractive instruments for circumventing capital flow management measures.Another concern highlighted by the RBI is that stablecoins could undermine credit risk assessment and interfere with banks’ ability to mobilize money and create credit by offering an alternative to the domestic financial system. Additionally, the report emphasized the difficulty in tracking peer-to-peer transactions, on the basis that they increase the potential for illicit activities.In light of these risks, the RBI reiterated its call for global coordination and regulation. It emphasized the need for a globally coordinated approach to analyze the risks posed to EMDEs compared to advanced economies (AEs). As India holds the G20 presidency, one of its priorities is to establish a framework for the global regulation of unbacked crypto-assets, stablecoins, and decentralized finance (DeFi).Establishing a CBDCWhile the RBI has been cautious about cryptocurrencies, it has shown more enthusiasm for central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). In November, the RBI launched a wholesale digital rupee pilot project. It followed that up in February with a retail digital rupee pilot project. In March, it signed an agreement with the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates to study a CBDC bridge aimed at facilitating trade and remittances.By calling for global regulation and highlighting the risks associated with stablecoins, the RBI aims to foster a safer and more secure environment for financial transactions while exploring the potential benefits of CBDCs in facilitating trade and remittances.As the discussions around stablecoins and CBDCs continue, we’re likely to see ever greater collaboration between regulators, policymakers, and international organizations with a view towards establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework that addresses the challenges and harnesses the potential of digital assets on a global basis.

Lack of Funds Sees Multichain Cease OperationsThe development team behind Multichain, a cross-chain protocol, has recently announced its decision to cease operations due to a lack of operational funds.This announcement follows a report by blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis, which suggested that insiders may have orchestrated a “rug pull” by withdrawing funds. The Multichain team took to Twitter on Friday to inform their community about the suspension of their business activities, citing a lack of alternative sources of information and operational funds as the primary reasons for their decision.One crucial factor contributing to the shutdown is the absence of communication with the CEO, Zhaojun, who had been missing and is now understood to be in the custody of Chinese authorities. The team explained that they had reached out to Zhaojun’s family and discovered that the police had seized his computers, phones, wallets, and mnemonic phrases.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashOperational controlThroughout the project’s lifespan, Zhaojun had maintained control over operational and investor funds. Consequently, the team, along with all their funds and access to servers, found themselves at Zhaojun’s mercy, as he now remains under police custody.Attempting to salvage the situation, Zhaojun’s sister initiated an asset preservation act and transferred some funds to addresses under her control. However, the team soon received news that Zhaojun’s sister, too, had been detained by the police and was now unreachable. Faced with these unfortunate circumstances, the team reluctantly announced the cessation of their operations.DeFi centralization risksThe debacle has raised concerns about the lack of decentralization demonstrated by the level of control Zhaojun had over the project. It prompted comment from Chris Blec, a DeFi Researcher & Analyst who has been highly critical of a whole host of DeFi projects on the basis that while many DeFi projects claim to be decentralized, they’re critically flawed and are centralized to a point that puts them at critical risk.Taking to Twitter, Blec stated: “Dude gets thrown in jail, admin keys to Multichain are on his computers, sister eventually uses his computer to steal money, now she’s in jail too. THIS IS WHY WE DECENTRALIZE.”The Multichain debacle traces back to May when the suspension of Multichain routes for an upgrade caused delays in fund transfers. The uncertainties surrounding the protocol prompted crypto exchange Binance to halt deposit and withdrawal support for certain Multichain bridged tokens.Adding to the platform’s woes, significant outflows from the Multichain MPC bridge platform raised concerns of an exploit. Observers analyzing the blockchain data reached a consensus on July 6 that the protocol had been hacked, as over $100 million worth of assets were withdrawn from the Fantom bridge on the Ethereum side.As Multichain now faces the unfortunate reality of halting its operations, it serves as a stark reminder of the challenges and risks inherent in the blockchain industry. The lack of operational funds, combined with the absence of communication with key figures and critical points of centralized failure have proven insurmountable for this cross-chain protocol.