South Korean cryptocurrency-only exchange Cashierest to close its doors

Taiwan’s Comma3 Ventures Raises $45M Crypto FundTaiwan-based Comma3 Ventures, a venture capital firm focused on Web3, has closed funding on a $45 million Web3 fund.The raise was achieved through the participation of a diverse range of institutional investors, high net worth individuals and family offices based in Taiwan and Singapore.In a press release published on Friday, the company stated that the funds raised will be allocated to blockchain infrastructure projects at an early stage of development, focusing on dApps, zero-knowledge proof technology, cross chain bridging projects, as well as layer one and layer two blockchain networks.Photo by Frolda on UnsplashSingapore tiesWhile Taiwan-based, the venture capital has strong ties with Singapore, given that Nicole Liu, one of the firm’s general partners, was formerly an investment manager with Jubilee Capital Management.Liu leads the firm alongside fellow general partners, Ivan Li and Denny Yang. Among the previous projects the trio have invested in are Zilliqa, a smart contract blockchain network that focuses on throughput and scalability, Ethereum layer two side-chain network Polygon, South Korean enterprise blockchain Klaytn, blockchain-based esport game producer Thetan Arena, and a project called Highstreet which seeks to re-imagine retail in the metaverse.Earlier this month, Cetus, a decentralized exchange (DEX) and concentrated liquidity protocol built on the Sui and Aptos blockchains, secured funding from Comma3 Ventures, alongside AC Capital, Adaverse, Animoca Brands, Coin98 Ventures, IDG Capital, KuCoin Ventures, Leland Ventures, NGC Ventures and OKX.Funding 80 to 100 Web3 start-upsAccording to Comma3 Ventures, crypto start-ups that have the potential to scale within the Web3 space within niches such as DeFi and GameFi, will be prioritized for funding. With a spend of $45 million at its disposal, the venture capital firm intends to target around eighty to one hundred start-ups, with a capital funding variance of between $250,000 to $1 million depending on the particular project.In a press release Liu stated: “We regard ourselves as an early-stage investor, so team background and previous experience are very important for us. And on the other hand, we are looking for entrepreneurs who really know what blockchain and Web3 are and how to rebuild their businesses empowered by decentralization technology and token economics. We are dedicating ourselves to investing in and supporting early-stage blockchain infrastructure such as L1&L2, cross-chain, and ZK, as well as DAPPs with the potential to bring traffic to Web3, such as DeFi, GameFi, and creator economies.”In a 2021 podcast, Ivan Li explained that his first allocations in the crypto space were to Bitcoin and Ethereum. Those successful investments were reinvested and allocated to blockchain, data analysis and cyber security projects. From 2021 onwards, Li explained that institutions in the TradFi space in Taipei started to approach him with an interest in trying to get exposure to crypto. That led to him forming Red Building Capital in 2018. Comma3 Ventures followed in 2022.

Binance Initiates Registration Process for AML Compliance in TaiwanGlobal crypto exchange Binance has set in motion the process of registering under Taiwan’s Money Laundering Control Act, the sole crypto-related regulatory framework currently established in Taiwan.In a confidential gathering on Tuesday, Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) conveyed to numerous domestic crypto service providers that Binance is in the process of applying for registration to ensure compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) regulations, according to a local media report.Photo by Thomas Tucker on UnsplashImportance of AML complianceTaiwan has mandated that virtual asset service providers (VASPs) adhere to its anti-money laundering statutes since the FSC introduced AML rules in July 2021. Outside of these measures, the cryptocurrency industry in the country remains largely unregulated.Speaking to The Block on Friday, an FSC official refrained from confirming whether Binance had already submitted the necessary documentation to register with the regulatory body. However, the official did emphasize the importance of offshore crypto platforms operating in Taiwan abiding by the local AML regulations.While Binance is not yet regulated in Taiwan, it has established a local entity named “Binance International Limited Taiwan Branch (Seychelles),” as per records from the Department of Commerce’s database. The registration particulars indicate that the Taiwanese government endorsed Binance’s company registration on May 12, 2023, with a registered capital of NT$30 million ($944,000) within Taiwan.Cooperation with law enforcementBinance has taken steps to cooperate with local law enforcement agencies to combat cybercrime in Taiwan. In June, the exchange revealed its collaboration with Taiwan’s Criminal Investigation Bureau, leveraging its expertise to assist over 200 Taiwanese law enforcement officers in addressing digital asset-related criminal activities.Damien Ho, Head of Global Partnerships at Binance, remarked in a blog post at the time:“As an increasing number of individuals in Taiwan show interest in cryptocurrency, ensuring a secure and comfortable crypto ecosystem for users becomes crucial.”Growing Asian influenceBinance’s influence is growing across Asia. This month, it officially launched operations in Japan after its acquisition of the local exchange Sakura Exchange BitCoin in November 2022, paving the way for regulatory oversight by the Japan Financial Services Agency (JFSA). Earlier this month, an investigative report carried out by the Wall Street Journal revealed that Binance is thriving in China in spite of the fact that crypto trading is a banned activity there.Regulatory guidelines anticipatedTaiwan’s FSC, which assumed the role of the primary regulator overseeing the crypto industry in March, is currently formulating comprehensive guidelines for trading and payments involving cryptocurrencies for VASPs.The FSC has disclosed plans to release the VASP guidelines by the end of September. Kevin Cheng, a Director at the Taiwan Fintech Association, revealed that the FSC intends to implement a stringent regulatory approach for crypto platforms in Taiwan, similar to its oversight of traditional financial institutions.Cheng noted: “The FSC plans to require VASPs to keep their own crypto assets separate from the clients’ crypto assets and to have accounting firms audit such assets every year.” However, Cheng highlighted the potential difficulty of this requirement, as many accounting firms might hesitate to serve crypto clients due to the specialized nature of crypto-related information.

Chinese Court Recognizes Virtual Assets as Legal PropertyAccording to a recent report published by the People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China, a Chinese court has recognized the legal status of virtual assets, having analyzed their attributes within the framework of Chinese criminal law.The court unequivocally stated that virtual assets are considered legal property under the current legal policy framework and are thus protected by law.The People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China exercise judicial power independently, free from interference by administrative or public organizations. They have responsibility for adjudicating civil, criminal, and administrative cases.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashProperty classificationLocal news source Odaily News reported on the development on Friday, indicating that the report, titled “Identification of the Property Attributes of Virtual Currency and Disposal of Property Involved in the Case,” explicitly recognized the economic attributes of virtual assets, leading to their classification as property.This declaration is particularly significant in light of China’s sweeping ban on decentralized cryptocurrencies. Despite this ban, the report argues that virtual assets held by individuals should enjoy legal protection within the existing policy framework.Furthermore, the report proposed recommendations for addressing crimes involving virtual assets. It emphasized that in cases where money and property are involved, confiscation should be based on the integration of criminal and civil law. The approach taken aims to strike a balance between safeguarding personal property rights while also addressing broader social and public interests.Contentious approach to cryptoWhile China has been making every effort to promote its central bank digital currency (CBDC) and the development of blockchain and metaverse-related technology within the country, its stance on decentralized cryptocurrencies has been contentious at best.Its approach in that respect has been marked by a blanket ban on crypto-related activities such as mining and trading and the prohibition of foreign crypto exchanges from serving customers within mainland China. Nevertheless, Chinese courts have consistently taken a more nuanced view without necessarily contradicting the government’s approach.Differing interpretationsThe divergence between national policy and court rulings first emerged in 2019 when the Hangzhou Internet Court found that Bitcoin is a form of virtual property, and on that basis, it is safeguarded by the law from the point of view of property rights. In May 2022, a Shanghai court affirmed that Bitcoin qualifies as virtual property and, as such, falls under the purview of property rights.Global issueIt’s not just the Chinese courts that are grappling with the issue of clarifying property rights relative to virtual assets. In April of this year, a case in Hong Kong involving defunct crypto exchange Gatecoin resulted in the courts determining that cryptocurrency is property and that on that basis, it’s “capable of being held in trust.”In July a Singaporean court determined that cryptocurrency is capable of being held in trust and on that basis, it should be recognized as property. Earlier this year, the High Court of Justice in London recognized non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as property.The report from the People’s Court reaffirms the legal status of virtual assets as protected property under Chinese law. This development highlights the ongoing divergence between China’s regulatory policy and the judicial interpretation of virtual assets, signaling a potential evolution in the country’s approach to cryptocurrencies.