Exhibition in Goyang City presents blockchain’s use in digital media

DeFiance Capital Secures Interim Victory in Dispute With 3ACSingapore’s DeFiance Capital, a Web3 and crypto investment firm, has notched up a small triumph in its ongoing $140 million legal clash with failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on UnsplashFavorable rulingAccording to a statement provided via a Medium blog post by DeFiance Capital Founder and CEO Arthur Cheong on Tuesday, the High Court of Singapore has delivered a favorable ruling for the firm, endorsing its preference for jurisdiction in Singapore, rather than the British Virgin Islands, which had been advocated by 3AC.The tussle between 3AC and DeFiance Capital centers around the ownership of certain assets. The liquidators appointed by the British Virgin Islands Court, from Teneo, assert that these assets essentially belong to 3AC’s creditors. However, DeFiance Capital argues vehemently that these assets must be partitioned and returned to its stakeholders.Struggle over assets and jurisdictionAt the heart of the matter are assets totaling $115 million, encompassing digital currencies and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), which currently remain under the control of DeFiance Capital. Additionally, there are 69 SAFE (simple agreement for future equity)/SAFT (simple agreement for future tokens) agreements linked to 3AC. Although Teneo places the collective worth of these assets at roughly $141 million, DeFiance Capital’s estimation is more conservative, pegging it at around $120 million.Beyond asset ownership, jurisdiction has become a pivotal point of contention in the legal discourse. DeFiance Capital has steadfastly advocated for legal proceedings to take place in Singapore, where it operates, as opposed to the British Virgin Islands. The recent ruling from the High Court of Singapore lends support to this stance, challenging Teneo’s argument.DeFiance articulated its position, asserting: “Our position was that all the important witnesses and documents are in Singapore and the dispute ought to be heard by the Singapore Courts to ensure all relevant evidence would be available.”With the court’s decision aligning with DeFiance’s jurisdictional preference, the firm hopes that this development will pave the way for more substantive engagement between the parties, rather than being embroiled in procedural wrangling. The firm believes that this will allow the focus to shift towards addressing the core issues at hand.Business riftThe genesis of this legal saga dates back to 2020 when DeFiance was established as part of the 3AC group, operating autonomously under the stewardship of its founder, Arthur Cheong. The rift escalated in February 2022, when Cheong declined 3AC’s proposal to relocate to Dubai, eventually leading to the formation of two Singapore-based firms in May of that year.Furthermore, in the same month, DeFiance extended a loan of $35 million worth of USDC to 3AC, effectively becoming a creditor. Complications arose when 3AC’s founders transferred legal rights related to DeFiance Capital, a transaction that remained incomplete as 3AC filed for bankruptcy.In light of the ongoing dispute, 3AC asserted that DeFiance’s assets should be harnessed to settle its debts. However, DeFiance firmly stood its ground, upholding its ownership claims over the assets.With liquidators advocating for resolution in the British Virgin Islands — a move that DeFiance rejected due to its Singaporean management ties with 3AC — the stage was set for the legal clash that has now taken a notable turn with this recent court ruling.

China’s leading science foundation has initiated a research program to examine the effects of stablecoins, reflecting concerns that such digital currencies could pose a risk to the nation’s financial system and its fiat currency. According to the South China Morning Post, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) is now offering grants for studies focused on stablecoins and the creation of cross-border monitoring frameworks. The foundation expressed that the unmonitored circulation of private stablecoins, particularly those pegged to the U.S. dollar, could weaken capital controls and present a potential challenge to the yuan. This initiative emerges as governments around the world, from the U.S. to regional financial centers, are actively developing rules for the digital asset sector.Photo by  Christian Lue on UnsplashStrategic research and internal debateThe NSFC will fund the projects with grants valued between 200,000 and 300,000 yuan ($28,042 to $42,063). Researchers are expected to complete their work within a year and deliver policy recommendations on how China can manage the challenges posed by global stablecoins and contribute to digital finance governance. The deadline for applications is Oct. 9. This research program is set against a backdrop of internal discussion in China regarding the possible launch of a yuan-backed stablecoin. While some economists support the idea of boosting the yuan's international profile, Bloomberg noted that former central bank governor Zhou Xiaochuan has advised caution. He recently said the high efficiency of China's current payment systems and warned that financial stability could be threatened by speculation in the stablecoin market. Analysts believe any state-sanctioned yuan stablecoin would likely be confined to offshore markets and tied to the offshore CNH. Global regulatory landscapeChina’s examination of stablecoins is part of a broader global trend of increased regulatory focus on the asset class. In Hong Kong, a new ordinance took effect on Aug. 1, creating a mandatory licensing system for stablecoin issuers under the oversight of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. Other Asian nations are also taking action. South Korea’s government is reportedly exploring a model for a won-pegged stablecoin involving a consortium of banks and non-bank entities. Separately, Cointelegraph reported that Kyrgyzstan has introduced legislation outlining a regulatory framework for such assets. Developments are also accelerating in the U.S., where the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act was signed into law, creating a federal structure for stablecoin oversight. On a commercial level, a Minnesota-based credit union, St. Cloud Financial, intends to introduce its own stablecoin later this year, a move highlighted by Cointelegraph. This token, named Cloud Dollar (CLDUSD), is designed to integrate with the credit union's banking system to facilitate faster and cheaper transactions for its members within a regulated environment.

In Malaysia local regulator the Securities Commission has ordered global crypto exchange platform Bybit to shut down its operations within Malaysia as part of enforcement actions being taken by the regulator against the company.Photo by Esmonde Yong on UnsplashOperating without registration The Securities Commission published a statement to its website late last week outlining that both Bybit and its CEO Ben Zhou had been reprimanded for carrying out digital asset trading activities in Malaysia without having completed the necessary registration. The regulator also pointed out that both Zhou and his company have been listed on its Investor Alert List since July 2021. The Securities Commission took the opportunity to remind investors that they should only deal with what it termed “Recognized Market Operators” (RMOs), a designation it applies to entities that have completed registration with the regulator. Investors who utilize unregistered platforms are not extended any form of protection under Malaysian securities law, the Securities Commission warned, adding that such platforms could put them at risk of fraud and implicate them in money laundering activity potentially. Enforcement actions Bybit has been directed by the regulator to disable its website and mobile applications that are currently targeting Malaysian investors within 14 business days from Dec. 11.  The regulator also wants the company to curb other forms of promotion aimed at Malaysian investors. With that, it has requested that the company take down its Telegram-based support channel for Malaysian customers. Advertising activity, including social media posts, must also cease in cases where such activity is aimed at Malaysian investors. The Securities Commission acknowledged that thus far, Bybit has been compliant with its latest enforcement requests. Intentions to secure licensing Bybit has responded to these developments on its Bybit Malaysia Telegram channel, stating that the company understands that these actions “may cause some inconvenience” to Malaysian customers. “Once we have secured the appropriate licenses, we look forward to reconnecting with you again in the future,” it added. The enforcement action is likely to be a setback for Bybit given that the firm appeared to be focusing on the Malaysian market of late. In June it emerged that the company was moving to relocate Chinese employees to both Malaysia and Dubai.  This is not the first occasion in which Malaysia’s Securities Commission has taken action against a crypto platform. In 2023 the commission ordered the closure of the Malaysian operations of global exchange Huobi (subsequently rebranded as HTX). The circumstances in that instance were similar in that it acted against the exchange and its CEO for operating illegally within the Malaysian market. Within the Malaysian market, only six trading platforms have been registered. These include Hata Digital, Luno, MX Global, Sinegy, Tokenize Technology and Torum International. Earlier the Securities Commission acted similarly in prohibiting Atomic Wallet from operating within Malaysia given its failure to register its digital asset exchange activities.