GRVT Debuts zkSync’s Inaugural ‘Hyperchain’

Korea’s DAXA Prohibits Relisting of Delisted Cryptos for a YearThe Digital Asset Exchange Alliance (DAXA) in Korea will prohibit the relisting of cryptocurrencies delisted from its member exchanges for a year, according to Korean media outlet Edaily.©Pexels/Jan van der WolfDAXA’s arbitrary regulationSome criticize this regulation, arbitrarily created by DAXA, which consists of five major Korean cryptocurrency exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax), as this rule poses a significant impact on crypto issuers and investors.In fact, a blockchain industry insider said that when cryptos are designated by DAXA as a risky asset, their operators receive a notification from the group that relisting is possible after a year once delisted. So far, assets that have been delisted or designated as such are WEMIX, PCI, BASIC, SRM, and OMG.Coinone’s relisting of WEMIXDAXA added this stipulation, as it faced criticism for the absence of relisting regulations in its guidelines when Coinone, one of its members, exclusively relisted the WEMIX token. This raised doubts about the self-regulation of the industry because DAXA had decided the delisting of WEMIX on the grounds that the information on its circulation supply was unreliable.Crypto enterprises are complaining about DAXA’s devising of strict penalties when delisting processes are not transparent. DAXA has stated that a consensus has been reached for the first draft and it will be continuously revised.Stronger DAXA presenceThe Korean crypto industry forecasts that this regulation will empower DAXA’s presence in the crypto scene, considering that its members are responsible for 98% of the domestic trading volume.Experts note that DAXA needs to establish fairness and transparency in order for it to gain trust as a self-regulatory body. Park Yong-beom, Chairman of the Korea Society of Blockchain, said rules on listing and delisting have to be fair and transparent, and if market participants find them unconvincing, it would undermine the credibility and authority of the self-regulatory body.In an interview with Economic Review, Former KB Kookmin Bank CEO Lee Kun-ho suggested that DAXA should prioritize market vitalization and ecosystem strengthening. He believes that instead of focusing on market management and supervision, DAXA should concentrate on enhancing investor protection.

Korbit Report: SEC Commissioner Shares Insights on Crypto RegulationKorbit Research Center, a division of South Korea’s cryptocurrency exchange Korbit, on Monday, released a report that provides a comprehensive summary of its interview with Hester M. Peirce, a Republican Commissioner at the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which took place on August 18. The interview was conducted by Peter Chung, the head of research at Korbit Research Center.Photo by Joshua Hoehne on UnsplashKorbit’s meeting with US crypto expertsIn August, Chung made a trip to the United States, where he met with prominent figures and companies within the cryptocurrency industry to gain a deeper understanding of the ongoing institutionalization of cryptocurrencies in the United States. Through this opportunity, Korbit intends to release a series of reports that will encapsulate the valuable insights garnered during these interactions in the US.His first interviewee of the series was Commissioner Peirce, who serves as one of the five commissioners at the SEC. These commissioners are appointed by the President of the United States with the confirmation of the US Senate. To maintain political balance and impartiality, it is mandated that no more than three commissioners belong to the same political party.Peirce assumed her role as a Commissioner at the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in January 2018, following her appointment by President Trump. Before her tenure at the SEC, she held the position of Senior Counsel on the United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. She is known as an advocate for technological innovation.Token safe harbor proposalPeirce earned the nickname “Crypto Mom” due to her advocacy for encouraging innovation within the cryptocurrency industry through the implementation of reasonable regulations. One notable initiative that exemplifies her perspective is the token safe harbor proposal. This proposal suggests giving blockchain network developers a three-year grace period during which they can work on building a decentralized network while being exempted from complying with the registration rules of federal securities laws, as long as certain conditions are met.During the interview, Peirce expressed concerns about recent actions taken by the SEC, which have added to the uncertainty surrounding cryptocurrency regulations. She also emphasized the need for swift legislative action to establish a framework for cryptocurrency regulation. Peirce noted that there appears to be a tendency to prioritize the classification of virtual assets over investor protection.Suggestions for KoreaAlthough Peirce hasn’t engaged in any direct interactions with Korean regulators, she suggested the Korean government optimize regulations for its own cryptocurrency industry. Her suggestion was to minimize unnecessary intervention and instead foster an environment where the sector can naturally evolve in accordance with the principles of a free-market economy.Furthermore, Peirce delved into detailed discussions on three pivotal topics: the classification of virtual assets as securities, the need for disclosure requirements, and the significance of assessing the extent of decentralization within a network.Classification of cryptocurrenciesThe Commissioner said that it is inappropriate for the SEC to contend that most cryptocurrency projects should fall under its regulatory purview. The SEC’s argument is based on the assertion that cryptocurrencies may constitute securities because they function as a medium of value exchange in fundraising activities, much like investment contracts in traditional financial markets. Despite this, she expressed optimism regarding the recent US court’s ruling on the Ripple vs. SEC case, which she believes may help rectify misconceptions surrounding the classification of investment contracts.Balancing investor protection and investor choiceMeanwhile, she expressed her viewpoint that regulations aimed at protecting investors should stay true to the disclosure principles introduced back in 1934 when the SEC was first established. However, she also argued that the SEC should avoid imposing arbitrary restrictions on investors’ choices. During the initial phases of a cryptocurrency project, there tends to be an inherent information asymmetry between crypto project leaders and individual investors. To ensure a fair investment environment, she advocated for legal mandates for disclosure. Notably, both her token safe harbor proposal and the Responsible Financial Innovation Act proposed by US Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Cynthia Lummis incorporate such disclosure requirements.Decentralization assessmentCommissioner Peirce also approached the assessment of decentralization with a thoughtful perspective. Her Token Safe Harbor Proposal 2.0 states that after the three-year grace period, “token transactions may not constitute securities transactions if the network has matured to a functioning or decentralized network.” However, she admitted to grappling with the challenge of precisely defining what constitutes sufficient decentralization. During the conversation, she sought Mr. Chung’s perspective on this matter. In response, Mr. Chung shared that the Korbit Research Center regularly conducts measurements and assessments of the degree of decentralization for major blockchain networks every six months.Regarding the interview, Peter Chung expressed his admiration for the high-ranking official’s openness to innovation and strong communication skills. He also voiced his hope for more open discussions in Korea that could promote sustainable growth of the country’s crypto industry.

India Offers Suggestions in the Development of G20 Crypto GuidelinesIndia submitted its Presidency Note on Tuesday, contributing to the global framework for cryptocurrency regulation under the auspices of the G20, a forum comprising the world’s 20 largest economies.The document aligns itself with the guidance provided by prominent entities including the Financial Stability Board (FSB), the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).Photo by Swapnil Deshpandey on UnsplashKey Summit topicMany months in advance of September’s G20 Summit in New Delhi, it was clear that crypto regulation would be a key subject for discussion. The FSB’s guidelines, released in July, offer a comprehensive framework for regulating various crypto assets, particularly stablecoins, based on existing standards and principles. These guidelines encompass crucial aspects such as governance, risk management, disclosure, supervision, and cross-border collaboration.In May, the FSB’s Regional Consultative Group for Asia met in Cebu, in the Philippines. During that meeting, the FSB highlighted the risks implicated by digital assets.Published in June, the FATF guidelines put forth a universally applicable set of rules to combat money laundering and counter the risks of terrorist financing linked to cryptocurrencies. One of the main provisions is the “travel rule,” compelling crypto service providers to share customer information when conducting fund transfers.While the IMF guidelines are expected to be unveiled in August, they will encompass a synthesis paper that offers a comprehensive roadmap for crypto regulation. This roadmap is designed to reflect input from multiple stakeholders and jurisdictions.India’s supplementary additionsAmidst endorsing these global crypto guidelines, India also proposes supplementary additions, particularly highlighting the challenges faced by developing economies in the crypto realm. The document underlines that these nations may grapple with capacity and resource constraints when implementing effective crypto regulation and supervision.Furthermore, they might require more extensive access to reliable data regarding crypto activities and associated risks. Developing economies are also at a heightened risk of falling victim to illicit crypto use, including money laundering, tax evasion, and cyber-crime.In light of these concerns, India advocates for the inclusion of developing economy-specific considerations in the FSB’s guidelines. The country also urges for technical assistance and capacity-building support to be extended to these nations. Additionally, it proposes a global outreach initiative to raise awareness of the risks, commencing with nations experiencing higher levels of crypto adoption.Broadening the scopeAnother noteworthy suggestion from India is an extension of the regulatory approach beyond the G20’s scope, encompassing the broader digital economy. While recognizing that crypto is merely one facet of the sweeping digital transformation reshaping multiple sectors, India’s document underscores the need for enhanced cooperation and coordination among various stakeholders and authorities at both national and international levels.In this vein, India proposes that the G20 contemplate formulating a comprehensive framework for the digital economy. This framework should encompass a wide array of concerns, including data governance, digital taxation, digital identity, digital inclusion, and fostering digital innovation, according to the document.India’s exploration of diverse aspects related to cryptocurrency — ranging from legal status to taxation implications, central bank digital currency (CBDC) potential, and innovation possibilities — further underlines its desire to see greater international cohesion in relation to the regulation of digital assets.