GRVT Debuts zkSync’s Inaugural ‘Hyperchain’

Korea’s FSS Seeks to Protect Investors from Crypto Exploit LossesLee Bokhyun, Governor of the Korean Financial Supervisory Service, said the agency will seek to protect investors from losses resulting from cryptocurrency exchange exploits, according to Korean newspaper Donga Ilbo.©Pexels/RODNAE ProductionsEfforts to enact legislationWhile delivering a congratulatory speech at a forum co-hosted by Donga Ilbo and its subsidiary broadcasting company Channel A on Wednesday, Lee underlined that the agency will be committed to enacting legislation that obligates crypto exchanges to be held accountable for customer asset losses caused by hacks.He explained that amidst a continued crypto winter triggered by multiple failures, such as the collapse of the stablecoin Terra last year, cases of security vulnerabilities are subsequently occurring.Cold wallet requirementsIn response to this situation, financial authorities and the National Assembly are collaborating on legislation that would require crypto exchanges to store a portion of their custody assets in cold wallets, which are disconnected from the Internet, or face liability for damages resulting from hacks.A February report from blockchain data platform Chainalysis showed that losses to crypto hacks last year amounted to $3.8 billion. Earlier this month, Korean crypto exchange GDAC suffered an exploit of 20 billion KRW (~$15 million).Lee said the agency will work with the financial industry to bolster the fraud detection system and build an immediate response system that prevents uncanny transactions when abnormalities are detected. These efforts are to curb the rise in financial crimes, which followed the growing popularity of remote banking services.Experts’ inputsAt the event held to discuss the protection of consumer information in the digital age, senior researcher Kim Gap-rae at Korea Capital Market Institute said that a law should be introduced to penalize unfair practices, such as market manipulation and use of undisclosed information, in the virtual asset market.Lee Joo-hwan, head of the information security management division at Hana Bank, suggested the approach used in the US, which is recovering ill-gotten gains from financial crimes to compensate victims.Kang Byung-hoon, a professor who teaches cyber security at KAIST, anticipated that the financial industry would accelerate the adoption of confidential computing, a highly secure system, to which even administrators have limited access.

Yat Siu: Hong Kong’s Crypto Adoption Sanctioned by the MainlandIn a keynote speech at the Ethereum Community Conference (EthCC) in Paris on Wednesday, Yat Siu, Co-Founder of blockchain gaming and NFT firm Animoca Brands, shed light on Hong Kong’s rapid adoption of cryptocurrencies and Web3 technology, emphasizing its connection to developments unfolding in mainland China.Photo by Serey Kim on UnsplashDriven by the Chinese authoritiesSiu argued that the current crypto trend in Hong Kong signifies more than just the actions of the Chinese autonomous area itself, pointing to a larger agenda driven by China’s aspirations.According to Siu, the Chinese government’s release of its Web3 white paper in May, which positioned Web3 as the future of the internet, carries significant weight. Notably, this announcement came only days after Hong Kong revealed plans to allow retail crypto investments. Siu highlighted that even though China’s white paper did not explicitly mention cryptocurrencies, it is key to acknowledging the country’s commitment to advancing Web3 technologies.The news of Hong Kong’s crypto developments resonated throughout China, capturing attention even on China Central Television, the national TV channel. Siu underscored the broader implications of this coverage, suggesting that the developments in Hong Kong bear the imprint of higher authorities. He made it clear that any actions taken by Hong Kong would require the approval of China.Challenging US global hegemonyBeyond Hong Kong, Siu delved into the broader significance of Web3 as a tool to challenge the United States’ technological hegemony. He expressed concerns about the security risks associated with excessive reliance on tech giants such as Google, Apple, and Facebook. Siu argued that countries like Japan, Korea, and China view Web3 as an opportunity to break free from the dominance of US-centric technologies. This motivation is especially pronounced in China, which is actively pursuing de-dollarization.Reducing dependence on the US dollar represents a key factor driving the adoption of Web3 in these countries. Siu pointed out that the global currency’s position affords the United States significant power and influence, making it crucial for China and other nations to seek alternatives. Embracing Web3 technologies serves as a potential avenue for diminishing reliance on the US dollar and challenging the current financial status quo.While mainland China banned nearly all crypto activities in 2021, the country has remained one of the largest crypto-mining hubs worldwide, despite the prohibition. The proactive stance of Hong Kong in implementing crypto-friendly regulations has sparked hope that it could pave the way for China to eventually lift its long-standing ban.However, prominent figures within the Chinese establishment, such as CPIC Investment Management CEO Chenggang Zhou, have recently reiterated the country’s anti-crypto stance.The rapid adoption of cryptocurrencies and Web3 technology in Hong Kong provides a glimpse into broader developments unfolding in mainland China. Web3 is seen as a potent instrument for challenging US technological dominance, although whether that leads to China lifting its crypto ban is something that remains to be seen.

South Korean financial regulators have decided, at least for the time being, to maintain the current policy requiring cryptocurrency exchanges to partner with only one bank, according to a report from the Seoul Economic Daily.Photo by POURIA 🦋 on UnsplashDominance and money laundering concernsA government official cited concerns that allowing multiple banking relationships could potentially strengthen market dominance by leading platforms and increase money laundering risks. Regulators plan to revisit the issue after monitoring new developments following upcoming regulations that will permit institutional participation in the crypto market. This decision runs counter to a recent proposal put forward by the People Power Party (PPP) ahead of the presidential election that seeks to eliminate the one-bank-per-exchange requirement. Bizwatch reported that while the crypto industry initially supported the removal of this restriction unanimously, opinions have recently diverged among market participants. Divided industryMajor exchanges offering Korean won-based trading are mostly against the potential policy change. Except for Upbit, the country's largest platform, competitors express concern that modifying the rules could weaken their existing banking relationships if more financial institutions choose to partner with the market leader. Conversely, crypto-only exchanges, which cannot offer Korean won trading services, generally favor eliminating banking restrictions. These platforms believe relaxed regulations could create more opportunities to establish banking partnerships. Under current rules, virtual asset service providers must secure real-name accounts from a local bank to offer Korean won trading, placing those without such accounts at a competitive disadvantage. Banks also want changeKorean commercial banks align with crypto-only exchanges in supporting the easing of banking regulations. Jung Jin-wan, CEO of key financial institution Woori Bank, recently called for allowing multiple banks to serve individual crypto exchanges. He argues that the current one-bank-per-exchange system not only undermines systemic stability but also limits customer choice. While an official from a crypto-to-fiat exchange acknowledged the need for eventual reform of the one-bank-per-exchange system to improve customer options and market development, they also pointed out that industry stakeholders hold different views depending on their position in the market. The official said that dominant platforms perceive minimal practical benefits from permitting multiple banking relationships.