Streami Appoints New CEO, Boosting Hopes for Regulatory Crypto Approval in Korea

UAE Forges Partnership to Develop Blockchain-Based Carbon Credit SystemIn an endeavor to combat climate change, the UAE Ministry of Climate Change and Environment (MOCCAE) has joined forces in an initial collaboration with the Industrial Innovation Group and the Venom Foundation to pioneer a groundbreaking blockchain-based carbon credit system.Photo by Daniel Zacatenco on UnsplashThis is the latest commitment by the Middle Eastern country to combat climate change after announcing an ambitious target to slash carbon emissions by a substantial 40% before 2030, a significant escalation from its prior commitments.According to local news sources, a memorandum of understanding (MoU) outlining the partnership was signed by the three entities at MCCE offices in Dubai recently.Carbon credits on blockchainAt the heart of this innovative endeavor lies blockchain technology, heralded as a pivotal tool for both organizations and nations to meticulously trace carbon credits. By virtue of its immutability, data enshrined within the blockchain ensures ironclad security, enabling the seamless sale or exchange of credits while upholding complete transparency among stakeholders.Functioning as crucial intermediaries, government entities such as the UAE’s MOCCAE are poised to either allocate or sell dual-purpose credits to businesses. Beneficiaries can deploy the credits, authorizing the emission of a predetermined quantum of carbon within specific timeframes, or they can be lucratively traded, thereby aiding other establishments in mitigating their ecological footprint.Venom blockchainVenom blockchain is a network developed by the Abu Dhabi-based Venom Foundation. As an asynchronous blockchain, its design implements dynamic sharding with flexible nodes that adapt to traffic changes, rendering it infinitely scalable. The project has established itself within the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM), an international finance center and fintech hub.Revised environmental goalsThe UAE leadership recently orchestrated a sweeping recalibration of the nation’s environmental goals and carbon offset strategies. Envisioning a sustainable horizon, their overarching aspiration revolves around achieving carbon neutrality by 2050.Mariam Al Mheiri, UAE Minister of Climate Change and Environment, articulated how these shifts have cast a positive impact on the nation’s emissions reduction roadmaps:“The UAE believes in its ability to make a difference in this field and has pledged, through the third update of its second Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), to reduce its emissions by 40% compared to a business-as-usual scenario, an increase of 9% over its previous pledge.”Even though the UAE ranks 31st on a global scale in terms of total carbon emissions as of 2023, there stands a more sobering reality — the nation ranked sixth worldwide in terms of per capita emissions according to 2021 data. It also emitted a staggering 21.79 tonnes of carbon per capita in the same year.Concurrently with its overarching national push towards emissions reduction, each of the UAE’s seven emirates has unveiled localized initiatives to align with the bold “net zero by 2050” target.Among these, a comprehensive program championed by Crown Prince Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan has recently gained approval in Abu Dhabi, emblematic of a collective commitment to fostering a sustainable future.

HKX management has advised Hong Kong resident users of the platform to withdraw assets following the company’s decision to halt operations in Hong Kong.  The company publicized its decision on July 18, making the following statement on its website: “We would like to inform you that our management team has, after careful consideration, decided to withdraw our application for the Type 1 and Type 7 licenses under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) and the virtual asset service provider license under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (Cap. 615).”Photo by Zhe ZHANG on UnsplashCompliance strugglesHKX’s exit from Hong Kong is the latest in a series of crypto exchange withdrawals from the Chinese autonomous territory. Other exchanges such as OKX, KuCoin, Gate.io and Binance had all bowed out back in May.  HKX initially applied for a Hong Kong license in February. However, like many others, the exchange failed to comply with Hong Kong’s regulatory requirements. While Hong Kong has been making a concerted effort to establish a regulatory framework and licensing system in order to create the conditions for it to become a crypto hub, it has also been grappling with making regulations strict enough to stamp out fraud in the wake of the JPEX exchange scandal. With that, it appears that many exchanges are finding the regulatory requirements difficult to live with. Originally, 24 exchanges had applied for a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license. As it stands today, 12 of those original applicants have dropped out, with one more having its application returned with no clarity emerging as to the reason why. HKX has suspended new user registrations. The company’s management has not suggested that they will reapply for a license and reboot the service at a later stage. The company had flagged its intentions back in May, suspending trading and deposit services on May 29. OKX announced on May 24 that it was withdrawing from the Hong Kong market, citing a review of its business strategy. Around the same timeframe, Gate.io withdrew from the market in Hong Kong having failed to achieve compliance in accordance with the new licensing requirements.  Notwithstanding that outcome, the firm suggested that it planned to revamp its platform in line with the Chinese autonomous territory’s licensing requirements, and return to the market once that had been achieved. In a notice posted to its website on May 22, it stated: “Gate.HK is actively working on the aforementioned overhaul. We plan to resume our business in Hong Kong in the future and contribute to the virtual asset ecosystem after obtaining the relevant licenses.” That overhaul has yet to be completed as right now, the platform only allows the withdrawal of funds by its previous Hong Kong-based customers. Back in May 2023, Eddie Yue, the CEO of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, suggested that there would be no light touch regulation in Hong Kong. HashKey Exchange, alongside OSL, was the first business to secure licensing under the new framework. In April, HasKey CEO Livio Weng told the Financial Times that these regulations block access to overseas investors while the local market in Hong Kong isn’t very big. It emerged in recent weeks that Hong Kong regulators are reviewing whether crypto regulation is “excessively stringent.” 

Japan’s financial authority has decided to regulate cryptocurrencies under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, classifying them as financial instruments. According to a report by The Asahi Shimbun, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) intends to include this reclassification in an amendment scheduled for submission during next year’s regular Diet session. Under the revised framework, local crypto exchanges will be required to provide detailed disclosures on the 105 tokens they handle. This includes the existence of issuers, underlying technologies such as blockchain, and price volatility risks. The proposed regulations will also subject these classified cryptocurrencies to insider trading rules. Issuers and individuals affiliated with exchanges will be prohibited from trading based on material non-public information, such as the suspension of trading or an issuer’s potential bankruptcy.Photo by Karola G on PexelsToken coverage in JapanAlthough the regulatory list contains 105 tokens, data from the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA), cited in a New Economy report, indicates that Japanese exchanges currently list 119 cryptocurrencies, leaving unclear how the remaining digital assets will be regulated.  To enhance investor protection, the FSA will mandate specific disclosure requirements for issuers that use token launches for fundraising. These entities will be required to report on their latest business activities and future issuance plans annually. This legislative push follows a discussion paper published by the FSA in April, which proposed dividing crypto assets into two distinct categories. The first category includes tokens issued for raising capital, while the second comprises established cryptocurrencies that are not primarily used for issuer fundraising, citing Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) as primary examples. Tax cut from 55% to 20%In parallel with these regulatory changes, the FSA plans to request tax reforms similar to those applied to traditional stock trading. Under Japan’s current tax code, taxes on cryptocurrency gains can reach as high as 55%. The agency proposes reducing this rate to a flat 20% in next year’s tax reform. Responding to the news on X, Changpeng Zhao, the founder and former CEO of Binance, welcomed Japan’s initiative to lower crypto taxes. However, he noted that the proposed 20% rate remains high compared to other jurisdictions, many of which do not levy capital gains taxes on crypto at all. Crypto ETF CFDs set to closeThe government’s move to tighten regulations is already reshaping the financial product landscape. One immediate impact is visible in contracts for difference (CFDs) linked to crypto ETFs. As reported by FinanceFeeds, IG Securities, the Japanese subsidiary of the London-listed IG Group, announced changes to its offerings. The firm will stop accepting new orders for CFDs tied to BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust and its Ethereum equivalent on Dec. 1. Open positions are scheduled to be automatically closed on Jan. 31 of next year. If clients do not settle their holdings prior to this date, the final settlement will be calculated based on the official closing price of that final day. This discontinuation adheres to an FSA decision that derivatives referencing Bitcoin or Ether ETFs must be regulated as crypto-related derivatives rather than standard ETF products. These instruments, now under the crypto-related derivative classification, fall under stricter rules regarding investor protection, operational oversight, and licensing. Japan’s latest regulatory and tax initiatives reflect a broader effort to bring clarity and investor protection to the country’s growing crypto market. As the framework evolves, the industry will be watching how the new rules influence participation and market structure. With lower taxes and stricter oversight on the horizon, both investors and exchanges may need to adjust, potentially reshaping liquidity and Japan’s overall appeal while prompting trading platforms to rethink their product offerings.