KITC Cooperates with Buysell Standards to Develop Security Token Products in Korea

Representatives from various judicial authorities in China, including the country’s Supreme People’s Court, held a seminar recently to discuss crypto-related legal issues. Speculation on easing of crypto regulationsThat event has sparked a wave of speculation within the crypto sector about a potential softening of the official stance in China relative to crypto. The Chinese government banned crypto trading and mining in 2021. However, beyond these speculative takes, no verifiable information has arisen following the seminar to indicate that the Chinese authorities are pivoting and looking to overturn the current bans on crypto trading and crypto mining. A report emerged on Feb. 25 on Chinese social media platform WeChat that the seminar was held on Feb. 23. Among the attendees was the Dean of the Law School of the Renmin University of China, the Dean of the Law and Fintech Institute (China University of Political Science and Law) and officials from the Supreme People’s Court. Photo by Mikhail Pavstyuk on Unsplash‘Virtual currency disposal issues’The research topic, “virtual currency disposal issues,” included consideration not just of the disposal path of virtual currency but also how to establish and improve digital currency supervision going forward. Participants scrutinized both criminal and civil cases that had involved digital assets, with a focus on possible future enforcement strategies. Some attendees highlighted financial security concerns at a national level relative to digital assets, proposing a strengthening of Chinese regulations in order to minimize that risk. One official from Beijing’s Third Intermediate People’s Court outlined past rulings within the Chinese judicial system in crypto-related cases, while suggesting that there was a need for further research to be carried out in order to further refine the approach taken by the courts. Some proposed a need for further research that takes into consideration legal theory together with real-world application relative to the treatment of virtual assets. This view received the backing of Zhai Chao, vice president of the Supreme People’s Court, the highest court within the People’s Republic of China.Establishing legal precedentOver the last few years, Chinese courts have had the opportunity to establish several precedents relative to digital assets. In 2023 the People’s Courts recognized the legal status of cryptocurrency, classifying it as property. Around the same timeframe, the Shanghai Second Intermediate People’s Court published a report which recognized the unique attributes of Bitcoin, with the report also considering the legal treatment of cryptocurrencies. In September of last year, the People’s Court Daily, a state-run media outlet, published an article calling for standardization in terms of the legal treatment of virtual currencies within the court system. Last August a court in the Chinese province of Hubei ruled that investors must bear their own losses from virtual asset investments where such losses were caused by the closure of a crypto exchange. November 2024 saw further crypto-related court precedent in China, with the Shanghai High Court recognizing virtual currency as property, while a court in Shenzhen ruled that an employment contract that included payment of wages using stablecoin was invalid.

Russia is moving to let ordinary investors gain limited exposure to cryptocurrencies under a draft law that would bring digital assets under the country’s existing financial market framework rather than treating them as a separate category of regulation.Photo by Michael Parulava on UnsplashAnnual retail crypto cap set at $3,800According to a Jan. 13 report by TASS, Anatoly Aksakov, chairman of the State Duma Committee on the Financial Market, said the changes would allow digital assets to become part of everyday life for Russian citizens, but within limits. Under the proposal, annual crypto purchases by retail investors would be capped at 300,000 rubles (roughly $3,800). Aksakov added that professional investors would face no restrictions on crypto investing, noting that digital assets are expected to play a significant role in international settlements. The shift had already been signaled in a December statement from the central bank, cited by Bloomberg. The Bank of Russia said non-qualified investors would be allowed limited access to the most liquid cryptocurrencies after passing a knowledge test. Qualified investors, meanwhile, would be able to buy digital assets without restrictions—excluding anonymous tokens—after completing a risk-awareness assessment. Under the proposals, crypto transactions would be routed through existing market infrastructure. Regulated exchanges, brokers, and trust managers would operate under their current licenses, while custodians and crypto exchange services would be subject to separate requirements. Residents would also be permitted to buy digital assets abroad and transfer their holdings through Russian intermediaries, provided such transactions are reported to tax authorities. The central bank submitted the proposals to the government as part of legislative amendments intended to regulate trading by July 1. It also warned that crypto assets remain high-risk and that investors could face losses. The move marks a notable shift in tone for the Bank of Russia, which in early 2022 pushed for strict limits on the issuance and use of digital assets, likening them to pyramid schemes. Crypto’s role in Russia’s cross-border activity has since expanded amid Western sanctions, including restrictions on access to the SWIFT messaging system imposed on Russian banks after the invasion of Ukraine. Ruble stablecoin booms amid sanctionsThat environment has helped fuel the recent rise of a ruble-backed token used in cross-border flows. A7A5, launched in Kyrgyzstan in January 2025, capitalized on this demand, processing more than $93.3 billion in transaction volume over about a year, according to Chainalysis data. Operating on the TRON and Ethereum blockchains, the token has become a major tool for Russian users navigating banking restrictions. This utility had driven daily transfer volumes past $1 billion by July, according to Elliptic. The activity has persisted despite sanctions and questions about fundamentals, even as the ruble had gained roughly 40% against the dollar by early June, based on Bank of America data cited by CNBC. CoinMarketCap data show A7A5 listed only in a USDT pair on Uniswap V2, while an August Chainalysis report found that activity is concentrated on U.S. Treasury Department Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)-sanctioned services with Russian ties, including Meer, Bitpapa, and Grinex, a confirmed successor to Garantex. Operations on these platforms follow a strict Monday-to-Friday schedule, with volumes surging early in the week and vanishing on weekends. 

Korea’s FSS to Collect Public Comments on Financial Statement Guidelines for Virtual Asset EntitiesThe South Korean Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) has revealed a set of exemplary financial statements aimed at clarifying the disclosure requirements of virtual asset-related entities. These guidelines have been designed to align with the Korean version of International Financial Reporting Standards (K-IFRS), which was established by the Korea Accounting Institute (KAI).It was reported earlier this month that the Financial Services Commission (FSC) brought forward these regulations to tackle accounting uncertainties within the blockchain industry.The main goal of these exemplary guidelines is to help entities provide financial statement readers with essential information regarding virtual assets. This includes details about the reserve amount held by virtual asset issuers and information about the virtual assets held by virtual asset service providers (VASPs).Photo by Kelly Sikkema on UnsplashPresentation sessionsTo ensure effective dissemination and understanding of these guidelines, the FSS, KAI, and the Korean Institute of Certified Public Accountants (KICPA) have planned presentation sessions. These sessions will take place from July 26 to August 11, which will involve visits to VASPs, listed companies, and accounting firms. Valuable feedback and suggestions from these stakeholders are anticipated, as the events encourage open two-way communication and welcome participation from anyone interested.Discussion meetingsTo further refine the ideas put forward during the presentation sessions, two separate discussion meetings with experts are scheduled for September and October. The recommendations gathered from the industry will undergo a careful review by experts and be thoughtfully incorporated into the guidelines.The FSS will finalize the guidelines in cooperation with the FSC, and the Securities and Futures Commission under the FSC will review them and give approval for their implementation. This is expected to take place between October and November.The FSC has stated that these exemplary guidelines are currently in their preliminary stage and open to potential changes during the public comment period. Additionally, companies have the flexibility to make necessary adjustments to these practice guidelines to suit their specific needs and requirements.Issuers, holders, exchangesThe exemplary practice guidelines are specifically targeted at three types of entities: virtual asset issuers, virtual asset holders, and virtual asset trading exchanges.For virtual asset issuers, providing essential information about their virtual assets is a key requirement. This information should encompass their business models, accounting policies, obligations (e.g. whitepapers), and the current status of their projects. Such details should be disclosed in the annotations of their financial statements. Furthermore, revenue generated from the sales of virtual assets must be recognized, and any changes to their obligations should be duly noted. Moreover, disclosure of the reserved amount of issued virtual assets and their intended usage plan is mandatory.Companies holding virtual assets must provide information regarding accounting policies, the total value of assets held, the reasons behind their holdings, and any gains or losses incurred. Additionally, holders are obligated to disclose risks associated with virtual assets and their potential impact.Virtual asset trading platforms, such as exchanges, are mandated to disclose not only their own virtual asset holdings but also those held on behalf of their customers. This disclosure should encompass detailed information about their accounting policies, the total value of assets under their custody, associated risks, and the involvement of third-party custodians. In particular, the platforms must indicate whether they treat customer assets under their custody as assets or liabilities and provide a clear rationale for such classification in the annotations of their financial statements.