Aevo Launches Novel Index Perpetual Contract

Huobi Anticipates Break-Even in Q3 Following Consecutive LossesCryptocurrency exchange Huobi, under the guidance of its advisor and Tron Founder Justin Sun, has reported losses over consecutive recent quarters and is now eyeing a break-even point in the current quarter.Photo by Brands&People on UnsplashThree quarters of lossesIn a tweet posted by Sun on Tuesday, the Tron Founder revealed that Huobi hadn’t registered a profit from the third quarter of 2022 through the second quarter of this year. While exact loss figures were not disclosed, Sun attributed these financial challenges to excessive spending on marketing, advertising, and employee salaries. Notably, Huobi has since reined in these expenses, positioning itself for a potential return to profitability by the fourth quarter.Looking at the overall financial performance of Sun’s crypto entities, Huobi and Tron, the group appears to be on an upward trajectory. Sun’s tweet indicated a combined profit of $85 million, derived from $193 million in revenues and $108 million in expenses.Notably, the Q2 profit saw a substantial increase of 183% compared to the $30 million profit in Q1. Sun’s projections suggest that Q3 could see revenue reach $200 million, expenses remain at $100 million, resulting in a projected profit of $100 million for the quarter.Improved financial outlookSun highlighted on Twitter Huobi’s improved financial outlook, projecting a break-even status for Q3 and a modest profit for Q4 based on conservative estimates. Earlier in the year, Huobi implemented a 20% reduction in its workforce as a response to the cryptocurrency market’s bearish trends.Established in 2013, Huobi had maintained consistent profitability until the last few quarters, according to Sun. He clarified that despite reports linking him as the core investor through the M&A fund that acquired a stake in Huobi, he is merely an advisor to the exchange.Exchange business challengesHuobi’s struggles and subsequent efforts to regain financial stability mirror the broader landscape of cryptocurrency exchanges navigating a volatile market. No major exchange has been unaffected by a challenging business and regulatory environment over the past year.US exchange Coinbase is in a legal battle with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States. A report by Semafor on Wednesday suggests that the US Department of Justice is planning on bringing fraud charges against Binance, who is already fighting an action taken by the SEC. Binance has also been forced out of key four important European markets over the course of the past three months.Meanwhile, it has been claimed that KuCoin has been executing a layoff plan, something the company itself denies. In March, the company faced an action brought by the New York Attorney General on the basis of a failure to register as a securities and commodities broker-dealer.Huobi’s difficulties serve as a testament to the challenges and opportunities presented to all of the major international cryptocurrency exchange businesses.The company’s recent financial trajectory, marked by consecutive losses, has caught the attention of the industry. Justin Sun remains one of crypto’s most controversial figures, but with his guidance, the exchange will be working towards rebounding and returning to profitability in the coming quarters.

The Philippines Forging Crypto Reg. Path US Could Learn FromThe Philippines has demonstrated best practice in operating a sensible regulatory framework relative to cryptocurrency while the United States has erred by engaging in regulation via enforcement while responding after the horse has bolted in relation to a string of crypto company collapses. That’s according to Robert De Guzman, Head of Legal Compliance at Philippines-based cryptocurrency exchange Coins.ph.©Unsplash/C BuezaIn an opinion piece published in Forkcast News on Tuesday, De Guzman lays out his view as to what’s required in terms of regulation, while drawing comparisons between the application of regulation relative to crypto in both jurisdictions.The need for “sensible” regulationDe Guzman believes that the crypto industry’s recent failures are a wake-up call for the whole sector. Losses of billions of dollars affected Celsius Network, BlockFi, Voyager Digital, Genesis, and FTX, and led to Silvergate, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), and Signature banks’ collapse in a week. To maintain consumers’ trust, he believes that sensible regulation is necessary for the crypto exchanges dealing with digital assets.The legal compliance expert cites the FTX collapse. FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried’s empire was among the largest collapses. FTX pretended to support regulation, but its true nature was an offshore exchange for global clients. Nonetheless, some businesses act on their regulation support by acquiring licenses and complying with central bank audits in the countries of operation.State-level and industry-level regulationThe crypto industry being open to self regulation is one element of the solution, he says. Regulators must proactively protect their consumers from scams and business failures, not just clean up the mess after millions of people have been harmed.Regulatory failuresDe Guzman points the finger at reactionary regulatory action. Regulators filed charges against crypto industry founders after their collapse. Previously, they missed the problems of the largest companies. FTX, based in the Bahamas, was mismanaged, and American regulators only responded after customer issues. Regulations by enforcement, preferred in several countries, wait for failure to happen before taking action. Over-regulation through enforcement pushes platforms offshore, where Wild West-type environments thrive, with clear consequences.Regulators in some countries focus on surface-level questions, like which tokens should be considered securities, while others, like in the Philippines, prioritize execution-level details to protect consumers. Anti-money laundering measures and custody are core issues, with the G-7’s Financial Action Task Force’s Travel Rule likely to be more strictly applied. Active regulation and audits are needed to ensure financial platforms act responsibly with customer deposits. Basic rules need to be put in place through a licensing regime, followed by regulation of market practices like commingling of assets, self-dealing, and trading against customers.The Philippines sensible approach to regulationThe Coins.ph legal guru holds out his home country as exemplary in terms of its approach to regulation. The Philippines’ regulatory regime requires a virtual asset service provider (VASP) license to operate a crypto exchange, as well as additional licenses for other services. The country’s central bank, BSP, directly regulates all crypto exchanges and expands its crypto regulations to adapt to market needs. KYC processes in the Philippines require recognition of valid ID documents from across 82 provinces.Additionally, the BSP expects the industry to cooperate in quarterly audits where they share balance sheet information and disclose digital assets in hot and cold wallets. Regulators in the Philippines are proactive and knowledgeable about the crypto space, which sets a sensible framework based on customer protection.

While cryptocurrencies may be banned in China, crypto trading activity continues in some corners, nonetheless, sometimes through accessing overseas exchanges. With that, authorities recently uncovered a massive underground banking operation that exploited crypto trading platforms to evade local forex regulations.Photo by Manuel Joseph on Pexels$2.2 billion laundering operationOn Sunday, an account on popular Chinese social media platform WeChat run by China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) published details of the $2.2 billion laundering operation bust. Xu Xiao, the Inspector at the Qingdao Branch of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, revealed that the scheme involved underground banks who purchased virtual currencies and then sold the virtual currencies through overseas trading platforms to obtain the foreign currency they needed. This process, he explained, completes the conversion of yuan and foreign currencies, constituting the illegal act of buying and selling foreign exchange. Stringent capital controlsChina enforces stringent rules on money transfers outside the country. Citizens are limited to exchanging up to $50,000 in foreign currency and require a permit for transactions beyond that limit. Any transaction exceeding the limit without a permit is considered money laundering. During a recent investigation, authorities seized cryptocurrencies valued at approximately $28,000 in Tether, Litecoin and other digital currencies. However, the operation is estimated to have facilitated the movement of over $2.2 billion, involving more than a thousand bank accounts across 17 provinces and municipalities. Monetary control loopholesChina, once the largest cryptocurrency market, imposed a comprehensive ban on crypto exchanges in September 2017 and subsequently expanded its restrictions to include crypto mining and trading. Despite these measures, reports have surfaced about underground crypto exchange operations. Earlier this year, an investigative report by the Wall Street Journal found that global exchange Binance continues to do thriving business with Chinese customers. Global crypto exchanges are reportedly still onboarding Chinese clients indirectly. The South China Morning Post (SCMP) recently accused Binance of facilitating Chinese crypto trading accounts by falsely claiming they are from Taiwan. While mainland China adopts a hostile stance towards cryptocurrencies, the special administrative region of Hong Kong remains progressive in the sector. Hong Kong’s regulatory authorities have introduced specific rules for cryptocurrencies and are licensing crypto exchanges operating within the jurisdiction. Arthur Hayes, the co-founder of the BitMEX crypto derivatives platform, recently described Hong Kong as the gateway for mainland China to global capital markets. Hayes asserted that wealthy Chinese individuals all bank in Hong Kong and with that, they all have access to crypto exchanges and brokers. In Cambodia, it is understood that illicit Chinese-linked activities oftentimes implicate the use of U.S. dollar stablecoin Tether (USDT) to move funds in and out of China even though Tether is banned in Cambodia. The latest crackdown in China underscores the ongoing challenges faced by authorities in controlling crypto-related activities, highlighting the dynamic nature of such activity within and adjacent to mainland China. As regulatory scrutiny intensifies, the contrast between mainland China’s approach and Hong Kong’s more open stance toward cryptocurrencies becomes increasingly evident.