Japanese Crypto Exchange Zaif Adds KLAY/JPY and KLAY/BTC Trading Pairs

Duncan Chiu, a member of Hong Kong's Legislative Council, has expressed concerns over the stringent regulations imposed on cryptocurrency exchanges by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). In an opinion piece for the Hong Kong Economic Journal, Chiu argued that these rigorous standards have deterred major global exchanges from entering the Hong Kong market, undermining confidence in the region's commitment to developing Web3 technologies. He highlighted the recent withdrawal of license applications by prominent exchanges such as OKX, Gate.io and HTX as indicative of the flaws in the current regulatory framework.Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashLicensing system and industry developmentChiu criticized the fragmented approach to policy development for Hong Kong’s virtual asset market, noting that various aspects like VATP (Virtual Asset Trading Platforms), stablecoin issuance and virtual asset over-the-counter trading are managed by different departments without strategic industry consideration. He also mentioned feedback from license applicants who feel that the authorities lack a forward-thinking vision for fintech and are applying traditional financial principles too rigidly to the dynamic and innovative sector of Web3. Furthermore, Chiu pointed out the disconnect between the industry and regulators, particularly in the experience required of management in licensed crypto operations versus the practical experience of regulators in Web3, complicating effective communication and progress. 

China’s Jiangsu Province Integrates Digital Yuan Into Education SystemChina has taken a raft of measures to try to build momentum in its digital currency, the digital yuan or e-CNY, with the latest step being an expansion into the education system in Jiangsu Province.Photo by Kimberly Farmer on UnsplashChina’s digital yuan is a legal tender fully backed by the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) and pegged to the renminbi. Unlike most cryptocurrencies, it is not decentralized or anonymous but is monitored by the PBOC. While adoption has been slow, China has been first off the blocks in developing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) to the point of some level of active use by comparison with its international peers.Enforcing a payments use caseJiangsu Province will attempt to establish the use of the digital yuan in its education system by the end of 2025, according to the Jiangsu Education Department. By the end of the year, students studying within the province are likely to be paying tuition fees using the digital currency. The pilot plan that Jiangsu administrators within the province’s Education Department have put together also aims to establish a means through which examination registration fees will be paid in digital yuan, while scholarships will be received in the digital currency.Zhou Maohua, a researcher with Beijing-headquartered Everbright Bank, told China Daily that it is imperative that more users are registered and go on to actively use the digital yuan to further its development.“The establishment of infrastructure for the digital yuan should be further accelerated,” said Maohua. “Its software and hardware must be upgraded to improve user experience. The security and reliability of the system must also be strengthened,” he added.Over the course of the past three months, four million digital yuan accounts have been opened by ordinary citizens within Jiangsu Province. Total e-CNY transactions have reached a level in excess of 200 billion yuan ($29 billion).Multiple initiativesIn April, the administrators of the city of Changshu, which is situated within Jiangsu Province, announced that it was gearing up to commence paying state employees within the city in digital yuan. Around the same time, officials within the city of Xuzhou, also located within Jiangsu Province, announced that they were in the process of publishing a pilot scheme which will set out a means for promoting China’s e-CNY digital currency.If that was enough in proving Jiangsu’s commitment to furthering the development of the e-CNY, another Jiangsu Province city, Suzhou, was one of the first locations in China to run a digital yuan pilot scheme in April 2020.Earlier this month, it was revealed that the French international banking group, BNP Paribas, had partnered with the BOC in enabling an initiative to promote the use of the digital yuan among its corporate clients.China is working with other countries on a Multiple CBDC Bridge project to explore the feasibility of cross-border fund transfers among different currencies. Launching its own CBDC for cross-border transfers may allow China to reduce its reliance on the US dollar and increase its influence over global trade and monetary policy.

Korean Lawmakers Complete First Rough Draft of Virtual Asset User Protection BillKorean lawmakers have completed the first rough draft of the virtual asset user protection bill at a National Policy Committee meeting held later last month.©Pexels/Matthias ZomerAgreeing on term usage ‘virtual assets’So far, 18 bills have been proposed to regulate cryptocurrencies, and the lawmakers and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) agreed to use the term “virtual assets” to encompass similar terms such as digital assets and crypto assets.Phased enactment of billsThe bills are likely to be reviewed under the title “Virtual Asset User Protection Act.” The bipartisan group agreed to enact the bills in phases, introducing the user protection bill in the first phase and the virtual asset listing and issuance bill in the second phase.Meanwhile, there were mixed opinions on the content of the bills. In particular, there was debate over whether the bills should stipulate that the central bank digital currency (CBDC) is excluded from virtual assets, and whether the bills should include a standard for determining if a virtual asset is a security.Debate over stipulating CBDC’s statusThe stipulation of excluding CBDC from virtual assets was the most divisive topic since it would lead to defining the conditions for other assets such as non-fungible tokens. Moreover, the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, which currently regulates virtual asset service providers (VASPs), does not contain any stipulation on CBDC. Some raised concerns that such discrepancies could later cause confusion. In the end, assembly members decided to discuss the matter again in April after consulting with the Bank of Korea and the Ministry of Government Legislation.Criteria for classifying virtual assets as securitiesRegarding whether to include criteria for classifying virtual assets as securities, the lawmakers and financial regulators took different sides.Lee Yong-woo, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, underlined that a clear statement of the relationship between the issuer and the recipient of virtual assets in a whitepaper can determine their security status. He added that such provisions should be included in the bills.Park Min-woo, an FSC official, on the other hand, commented on a cautious note that in case virtual assets fall under the category of securities, they may not be applicable to the virtual asset act. He explained that VASPs might deal with both securities and virtual assets, and in such cases, there could be a misunderstanding that VASPs are not subject to the virtual asset act simply because they trade securities.