Japanese Startup Drives Asian Digital Payment Network Initiative

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) plans to roll out a new structure for its central bank digital currency (CBDC) operations, moving the digital yuan into a deposit-based role within the commercial banking system beginning Jan. 1, 2026. Lu Lei, a deputy governor of the PBOC, announced the update, marking a new direction after nearly a decade of pilot programs. According to a report by FTChinese, the move fits into Beijing’s broader economic planning, as authorities seek to reinforce China’s role in global finance while containing risks tied to loosely regulated digital activity. The deputy governor said China will continue to run the digital yuan under a two-tier system, with the central bank responsible for rules and infrastructure, while commercial banks manage wallets, payments, and compliance. He added that the arrangement is designed to prevent banks from being sidelined and to limit shadow banking risks associated with digital payment platforms outside the regulated system.Photo by Eric Prouzet on UnsplashDigital yuan transactions top $2.3TThe announcement comes as use of the digital yuan, known as the e-CNY, continues to rise. By late November 2025, the system had handled 3.48 billion transactions with a total value of 16.7 trillion yuan ($2.3 trillion). There are about 230 million personal wallets and 18.84 million corporate wallets. Beyond domestic use, the e-CNY is being positioned for international trade. Lu pointed to progress on mBridge, a cross-border payments project involving multiple central banks. The platform has processed 4,047 transactions worth the equivalent of 387.2 billion yuan ($55.3 billion), with the digital yuan accounting for about 95.3% of the settlement value. The deputy governor also sounded a note of caution on private-sector innovation, saying the rapid growth of digital assets and stablecoins could complicate the conduct of monetary policy. He said central banks need to ensure that new payment tools do not undermine macroeconomic stability or allow money to circulate beyond regulated channels. Hong Kong to license crypto dealers, custodiansAs Beijing moves to strengthen its state-backed currency framework, Hong Kong is also tightening oversight of the crypto market. On Dec. 24, the city’s Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) released their conclusions on proposed legislation to regulate virtual asset dealing and custodial services. Following the implementation of the Stablecoins Ordinance in August, regulators are now moving to require firms offering crypto dealing or custody services in Hong Kong to obtain licenses and operate under regulatory supervision. They also began seeking feedback on whether to extend oversight to virtual asset advisory and management providers, with the proposed framework modeled on existing securities market rules. In a separate development underscoring the contrast between state-backed and decentralized digital currencies in the region, reports this month pointed to a sharp drop in Bitcoin network activity linked to mainland China. BTC hashrate drop seen amid China mining changesKong Jianping, CEO of Nasdaq-listed Web3 infrastructure firm Nano Labs, said on the social media platform X that the global Bitcoin network’s hashrate fell by about 100 exahashes per second, or roughly 8%, around Dec. 15. He attributed the decline to the shutdown of an estimated 400,000 mining rigs, mainly in Xinjiang. A lower hashrate means less computing power is securing the network, reducing competition among miners that validate transactions. China has maintained a broad ban on crypto trading and mining since 2021. Industry outlet Wu Blockchain said the reasons for the latest shutdowns were unclear. 

Japan’s FSA Proposes Tax Exemption for Unrealized Crypto GainsThe Financial Services Agency (FSA) of Japan has taken the step of putting forward amendments that provide a notable tax exemption for unrealized gains on cryptocurrency holdings.Photo by Erik Eastman on UnsplashFSA proposalThe move is significant in that it spares domestic companies from the standard 30% corporate tax rate typically imposed on digital assets up until now. According to reports in local media, that proposal was detailed in a comprehensive 16-page document outlining various regulatory modifications.The most pivotal change within this document is the exemption of domestic companies from the annual “unrealized gains” tax on cryptocurrencies. Unlike some countries that only tax crypto assets when they are converted into fiat currency, Japan currently enforces an annual tax on these digital assets.2023 tax reform agendaThe proposed amendment has garnered support from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, indicating its potential passage. These discussions are part of Japan’s broader tax reform agenda for 2023, suggestive of the Asian nation’s interest in fostering a favorable environment for the blockchain and cryptocurrency industries.It is important to note that this tax exemption applies exclusively to companies that issue their own tokens and does not extend to entities solely involved in investing in other digital currencies. Additionally, individual crypto investors will still be subject to a maximum income tax rate of 55% on earnings exceeding JPY 200,000 ($1,355) related to cryptocurrency, categorized as “miscellaneous income.”The exemption is structured in a way that excludes these digital coins when assessing a company’s asset market value, provided specific conditions are met. Presently, Japanese law mandates that companies holding crypto assets must pay taxes on unrealized gains at the end of each tax period.To qualify for the tax exemption, a company must meet specific criteria outlined by the tax authority. Firstly, the company must be the issuer of the cryptocurrency in question. Additionally, it must retain continuous ownership of the crypto asset after issuance, while the asset itself remains subject to transfer restrictions.Blockchain ambitionsThis development aligns with Japan’s broader ambition to nurture and expand its blockchain and cryptocurrency sectors. Prime Minister Fumio Kishida recently articulated a vision for a “new form of capitalism,” emphasizing the importance of fostering innovation and growth in emerging industries, inclusive of the Web3 sector. As Japan moves forward with these changes, it signals its interest in creating a conducive environment for blockchain and crypto ventures to thrive.Over time Japan has been iteratively building a framework in respect of digital assets. In 2017 the country recognized Bitcoin as a legitimate property in accordance with the Payment Services Act (PSA). That same year, the Tax Agency classified crypto earnings as miscellaneous income. In 2020, crypto assets were included in Japan’s fund settlement law. Around the same time frame, the FSA brought in the requirement for crypto exchanges to register and obtain a license.These amendments also form part of a series of changes that the Japan Blockchain Association (JBA), an industry advocacy group, has been canvassing for. The proposed changes reflect a pragmatic approach to taxation, doing away with a paper profits taxation treatment in favor of a more progressive approach.

Bhutan Quietly Mining Bitcoin Since $5,000The tiny nation of Bhutan continues to be full of surprises recently where crypto is concerned, with the latest report suggesting that the kingdom has been mining bitcoin for a number of years already.© Pexels/Pema GyamtshoAccording to a recent report in The Bhutanese, a Bhutan-based publication led by investigative journalist, Tenzing Lamsing, the landlocked nation had been mining bitcoin over the course of a “few years” already, in an effort to diversify its sovereign portfolio.Long-term investment strategyUjjwal Deep Dahal, CEO of Druk Holding and Investments (DHI), told the publication that the venture was part of a long-term investment strategy. DHI is the commercial arm of the Royal Government of Bhutan. It was formed pursuant to a Royal Charter in 2007 with the mandate of making investments on behalf of Bhutan while optimizing usage of resources.The mining activity had centered on Bitcoin although there was a small provision for Ethereum-based mining when Ethereum was a mineable proof-of-work (PoW)-based blockchain network. It’s unclear of the precise timeline but the report outlines that DHI has engaged in the mining space over a number of years, and at a time in which the Bitcoin unit price was as low as $5,000.Exploiting cheap hydroNestled in the Himalayas, Bhutan has considerable hydroelectric resources. Bitcoin mining is ordinarily an expensive exercise but in scenarios where there are plentiful energy resources with a marginally cheaper cost of production than the average, it can be an attractive and profitable enterprise. Dahal outlined that these conditions enabled DHI to reinvest profits back into additional mining equipment.The precise time-frame of DHIs entry into Bitcoin mining is open to speculation. However, we do know that the Bitcoin unit price was last below $5,000 at the onset of the pandemic in March 2020. Prior to that, Bitcoin had risen above $5,000 in April 2019 following an acute bear market in 2018.Crypto lender entanglementsBhutan and DHI hit the crypto radar last month when it was revealed that the kingdom had made significant investments into and out of failed crypto lenders Celsius and BlockFi. Dahal has said that the royal charter-mandated firm had taken out loans with both crypto lenders and had fully repaid those loans. However, that may have been something that happened later than anticipated. The Bhutanese company had a $30 million loan from BlockFi. BlockFi liquidated the Bitcoin collateral associated with that loan in 2022 but it left a shortfall of $800,000. The failed lender subsequently sued DHI. As of an April 13 court filing, BlockFi submitted a voluntary dismissal of the lawsuit to the courts, presumably because the shortfall was subsequently paid by DHI.In the case of Celsius, DHI had withdrawn $65 million from the lending platform prior to it declaring bankruptcy. Consequently, the matter has been the subject of speculation relative to the potential for the Celsius bankruptcy estate to pursue DHI for a clawback of the withdrawn funds.