Singaporean Regulator Proposes Framework for Digital Money Use

HKMA Issues Warning Against Crypto Firm MisrepresentationThe Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the central bank for the Chinese autonomous territory, has taken a stand against cryptocurrency businesses that falsely present themselves as “banks” and market their products as “deposits,” issuing a public advisory to raise awareness about the issue.Photo by Marcel Eberle on UnsplashBanking ordinance violationsIn a press release published to its website on Friday, the HKMA said that instances had arisen where crypto firms had labeled themselves as “crypto banks,” “crypto asset banks,” and “digital trading banks.” The regulatory authority underscored that such misrepresentations could be in violation of the Banking Ordinance in Hong Kong.In addition to adopting misleading bank-related titles, these crypto firms have been advertising “savings plans” as “low risk” with “high return,” potentially misleading the public into believing that these entities are authorized banks in Hong Kong, where they can securely deposit their funds.The HKMA stressed that only entities such as licensed banks, restricted license banks, and deposit-taking companies, collectively referred to as “authorized institutions” and holding a license granted by the HKMA, are legally permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong.Furthermore, funds held on crypto exchanges are not covered by Hong Kong’s Deposit Protection Scheme. “Under the Banking Ordinance, only licensed banks, restricted license banks and deposit-taking companies, which have been granted a license by the HKMA can carry out banking or deposit-taking business in Hong Kong,” the HKMA stated.Misuse of banking termsAny entity using the term “bank” in its business name or implying that it offers banking services in Hong Kong is committing an offense, according to the central bank. The same rule applies to any entity engaging in deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong or soliciting the public to make deposits.It’s important to note that crypto firms not officially recognized as banks in Hong Kong are not subject to the oversight of the HKMA.The HKMA advised the public to exercise caution. In cases of uncertainty regarding an entity claiming to be a bank or soliciting deposits in Hong Kong, individuals are encouraged to consult the register of authorized institutions on the HKMA’s website, and if doubts persist, it suggests that they should contact the authority via its Public Enquiry Service hotline.According to section 97 of the Banking Ordinance, only a bank or a central bank can use the term “bank” or its derivatives in its business name in Hong Kong without the written consent of the HKMA.Additionally, sections 11 and 12 of the Banking Ordinance stipulate that only entities possessing a valid banking license or recognized as authorized institutions are permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong. As per section 92 of the Banking Ordinance, only an authorized institution is authorized to issue advertisements inviting the public to make deposits, with certain exceptions.The HKMA’s advisory serves as a stern reminder to the crypto industry that regulatory compliance and transparency are essential, particularly when using terms associated with traditional banking, to protect the interests of the public.

State-Owned Newspaper to Launch NFT Platform in ChinaChinese government-owned media outlet China Daily, under the guidance of the Publicity Department of the Chinese Communist Party, has allocated a substantial budget of 2.813 million yuan (equivalent to $390,000) for the development of an NFT platform.Photo by Hanson Lu on UnsplashInviting bids from home and abroadThe move will open the door to both domestic and international blockchain technology firms, inviting them to spearhead the creation of the platform. According to a public tendering announcement published last month, the chosen firm must operate on a blockchain mainnet capable of handling over 10,000 transactions per second, ensuring top-notch performance and reliability.One of the platform’s key features will be its user-friendly interface, allowing users to effortlessly upload, display, and manage their digital collections. It will support a wide range of multimedia formats and diverse collection types, making it a versatile hub for creative expression. Additionally, the platform will offer advanced functionalities like pricing, bidding, limited-time offers, and multi-currency settlement to ensure a comprehensive and satisfying user experience.Extending the reach of Chinese cultureThe core objective of the China Daily NFT Platform is to amplify the global influence of Chinese culture by seamlessly blending technology and culture in the metaverse. This ambitious strategy integrates cutting-edge technologies such as virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), mixed reality, blockchain, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), big data, and cloud computing.In an effort to expand the global reach of their digital collections, China Daily intends to collaborate with both domestic and international mainstream NFT platforms. This ambitious plan includes partnerships with well-known foreign platforms such as OpenSea, Rarible, SuperRare, and Foundation. Despite the rigorous regulatory landscape and scrutiny that blockchain entities face in China, this approach aims to make Chinese digital collections more accessible to a global audience.The urgency and importance attached to this project are evident in the tight timeline set by China Daily. The chosen contractor must submit their application by October 17 and complete the development of the platform within three months, highlighting the publication’s commitment to this venture.NFT platform development despite crypto banHowever, it’s important to acknowledge that this initiative unfolds within the backdrop of stringent cryptocurrency regulations in China. Since 2021, although NFTs have not been banned, all forms of cryptocurrency transactions have been prohibited in the country, and blockchain entities operating within China face intense regulatory oversight.In May the Supreme People’s Procuratorate of China issued a warning relative to NFTs on the basis that they have crypto-like properties. However, the agency also acknowledged that NFTs do present a novel application of blockchain technology.Recent events, including the detention of former China Evergrande executives Xia Haijun and Pan Darong for alleged involvement in fraudulent activities, underscore the strict regulatory environment prevailing in China.Within the Chinese autonomous territory of Hong Kong, the South China Morning Post (SCMP) spun out Artifact Labs, an NFT company, following an initial decision in 2021 to launch an NFT standard called artifact.China Daily’s foray into the NFT space demonstrates that some facets of blockchain innovation are being leveraged within China, in this instance with a view towards cultural promotion and global engagement.

Tether, the company behind USDT, the popular dollar-backed stablecoin, is seeking to establish a presence in South Korea through remote hiring, according to a report from Maeil Business Newspaper citing industry sources.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashRather than opening a physical office, Tether is looking for a remote employee who will focus on increasing USDT adoption in Korea, exploring business opportunities, building partnerships and navigating the local regulatory landscape. The expansion comes as stablecoins gain significant traction in South Korea. Data provided to lawmaker Min Byeong-dug from the country's five largest cryptocurrency exchanges via the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) shows that dollar-pegged stablecoins accounted for 47% of crypto assets withdrawn from these platforms between January and March. Central bank pushes for regulationMeanwhile, South Korean officials are increasingly focused on regulating the stablecoin sector. Bank of Korea (BOK) Governor Rhee Chang-yong recently called for the swift implementation of stablecoin oversight, warning that they could bypass the country’s financial rules. During a press conference in Italy, Rhee argued that stablecoins pegged to either the Korean won or the U.S. dollar effectively function as alternative currencies and should be examined under existing money transfer laws. Rhee has emphasized that authorities must first determine whether won-backed digital tokens should be permitted at all. Last October, during a national audit, he expressed concerns about stablecoins' dependence on fiat currencies and advocated for implementing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) instead. These concerns were echoed by Ko Kyeong-cheol, head of BOK's electronic finance team, who recently highlighted at a financial law conference that stablecoins could profoundly impact the central bank's ability to carry out monetary policy, maintain financial stability and oversee payment settlements. Ko emphasized that if South Korea were to permit won-pegged stablecoins, the BOK should be involved early in the approval process to minimize potential risks to its policy objectives. On the regulatory front, Financial Services Commission (FSC) Chairman Kim Byoung-hwan has indicated that discussions on developing a stablecoin regulatory framework are likely to begin in June as part of a broader initiative. Presidential candidates weigh in on stablecoin futureThe issue has also entered the political arena ahead of South Korea's June 3 presidential election. Lee Jae-myung, the Democratic Party of Korea's presidential candidate, has advocated for a market featuring won-based stablecoins. Lee argues that quickly adopting stablecoins would help South Korea keep pace with global trends and prevent capital outflows. His platform includes introducing spot crypto ETFs and reducing digital asset trading fees.  Another candidate, Hong Joon-pyo of the People Power Party, also previously announced plans to explore the issuance of a won-pegged stablecoin before being eliminated in the party's primary election.