Banking Difficulties Remain in Hong Kong for Crypto Start-Ups

Hong Kong’s Development as Crypto Hub May Soften Chinese Stance on CryptoHong Kong is making waves in the crypto sector that could potentially signal a shift in China’s attitude toward digital assets. That’s a theory that has been given consideration by crypto analytics firm Chainalysis in a recently released report highlighting Hong Kong’s crypto transformation and suggesting a growing tolerance for crypto within China’s corridors of power.Photo by farfar on UnsplashOTC trade showing resilienceDespite China’s stringent regulations and the ongoing crypto market downturn, Hong Kong’s over-the-counter (OTC) crypto market has demonstrated remarkable resilience, with a transaction volume of $64 billion in the past year. While this is slightly less than China’s $86.4 billion, it’s a noteworthy achievement considering Hong Kong’s smaller population and the challenges facing the crypto industry.The close relationship between China and Hong Kong has led some industry commentators to speculate that Hong Kong’s rise as a crypto hub could indicate a shift in China’s stance on digital assets.The crypto-friendly environment in Hong Kong has not gone unnoticed. Merton Lam of Crypto HK, an OTC digital asset trading center in the city, notes that cryptocurrencies have become an integral part of investment portfolios for banks, private equity firms, and high-net-worth individuals in the region. Even Chinese state-owned businesses are launching cryptocurrency-focused investment funds.Hong Kong cornering institutional tradeWhat sets Hong Kong apart in the crypto landscape is its proficiency in large institutional crypto transactions, with 46.8% of its annual crypto trades exceeding $10 million. In contrast, retail trades under $10,000 accounted for just 4% of the city’s crypto volume, slightly below the global average of 4.7%. This institutional dominance distinguishes Hong Kong from other Asian regions.For comparison, South Korea heavily relies on retail trading on centralized exchanges, while Japan maintains a transaction breakdown that aligns closely with global trends, balancing centralized exchanges with DeFi protocols.A cautionary noteHowever, Dave Chapman of OSL Digital Securities offers a note of caution, suggesting that Hong Kong’s promotion as a crypto hub might be more exploratory, aimed at gaining a better understanding of digital assets without significantly loosening mainland policies.Despite the uncertainties, Markus Thielen, Head of Research and Strategy at Singapore’s Matrixport, believes that Hong Kong is acting as a “testing ground” for broader cryptocurrency adoption in China. The city’s unique position makes it an attractive destination for the crypto asset management industry, setting it apart from other jurisdictions that often view crypto firms as service providers rather than end-users.Hong Kong’s progress is particularly noteworthy when considering the broader context of East Asia’s crypto market. Chainalysis analysis reveals that East Asia’s share of crypto transaction value dropped from around 30% in 2019 to less than 10% by the second quarter of 2022 due to China’s crypto bans. Hong Kong’s recent surge could potentially act as a “tailwind” to reignite crypto activity in the region.The evolving relationship between the mainland and the autonomous territory of Hong Kong may hold the key to understanding the future of cryptocurrency in the region.

Busan City Houses Two Foreign Financial Firms on the Road to Becoming Blockchain, Fintech HubThe city of Busan said Monday that it has chosen two financial companies, UIB Korea and Lina One, as the new occupants of Decacorn-Space — an office space on the 63rd floor of the Busan International Finance Center (BIFC) — in an effort to position the southern port as the nation’s blockchain and fintech hub.Busan has been running an open call for foreign financial institutions to move into the recently renovated space since June. After a rigorous two-step evaluation process, UIB Korea and Lina One were selected, the city said.This comes as part of Busan’s efforts to further develop the BIFC and become a major financial powerhouse in Korea.“We have been relocating public financial institutions, fostering financial experts, and exploring new growth drivers such as fintech, blockchain, and digital innovation,” the city’s mayor Park Heong-joon explained.Photo by Minku Kang on UnsplashAbout UIB Korea and Lina OneUIB Korea, or UIB Insurance Brokers, is the Korean branch of UK-based UIB Group — a global insurance broker that offers risk management advisory services. In particular, the firm is set to work with other domestic companies such as DB Insurance and Meritz Fire & Marine Insurance to establish a consortium for providing insurance products and consulting services.Meanwhile, Lina One is the Korean branch of Chubb Group, the world’s largest publicly traded property and casualty insurance company. One of the firm’s major goals is to promote the insurance information technology market in Busan.Notably, both companies aim to leverage their digital capabilities, experience, and competitiveness to achieve similar goals, which include digitizing insurance for various partners, ranging from maritime and industrial companies to regional banks, fintech companies, and individuals. In turn, their efforts are expected to expand Busan’s network with the larger global financial community and present the city as an ideal spot for international conferences.On the road to becoming a financial hubDespite considerable challenges such as the withdrawal of foreign financial institutions from Korea and the impact of COVID-19 on international travel, the city has continuously made efforts in collaboration with the Busan Finance Center to attract international financial institutions through events like investor relations meetings and local networking activities.To support the successful landing of these companies in Busan, the city will also offer one-stop services such as business model development support and residential settlement consultations.Once settled, UIB Korea and Lina One are expected to generate significant synergy with partner firms such as local financial holding company BNK Financial Group during the third phase of the development of the BIFC whose objective is to house innovative financial workspace by 2025.“It is crucial for us to attract more competent domestic and foreign financial institutions that will have a great impact on the city’s financial economy,” Mayor Park emphasized.

HKMA reflects on retail CBDC pilot phase one completionHong Kong’s Monetary Authority (HKMA), the Chinese territory’s central bank, recently released a report following the completion of phase one of its central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot, highlighting the potential benefits of a retail CBDC, commonly referred to as e-HKD (digital Hong Kong dollar).Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashUndecided on full implementationIn a press release published by the HKMA on Monday, the authority clarified that the report underscores that while a retail CBDC could bring value to the payments ecosystem and unlock new economic transaction possibilities, in-depth investigation and evaluation are essential before considering large-scale implementation.At this stage, Hong Kong’s central bank has not committed to introducing an e-HKD, but the report sheds light on the prospects and challenges associated with such a move. The region has been signaling its intent to position itself as a hub for virtual assets, evident in the regulatory framework introduced in June and the granting of licenses to crypto trading platforms in August.Project e-HKD, initiated by the HKMA in 2021, is a significant step toward assessing the feasibility of a digital Hong Kong dollar. The pilot program was launched in November 2022 as part of the HKMA's “Fintech 2025” strategy. However, the HKMA remains cautious, as reflected in the comments of HKMA CEO Eddie Yue earlier this month. Yue told the South China Morning Post that the central bank is still waiting for greater clarity when it comes to the technological, legal and societal aspects of full implementation.Three core attributes identifiedThe report identifies three primary areas where an e-HKD could provide value: programmability, tokenization and atomic settlement. These attributes could lead to faster, more cost-efficient and more inclusive transactions. However, it’s essential to note that the 14 pilot programs conducted with 16 participating firms during phase one were executed on a small scale within a controlled environment.The phase one review highlights that the true potential and prerequisites for implementing an e-HKD on a larger scale depend on market developments and further investigation. It acknowledges that minor issues identified during the pilot phase could become more prominent or even unacceptable in a production environment.Gearing up for phase twoPhase one of the pilot program delved into various aspects, including full-fledged payments, offline payments, tokenized deposits, programmable payments and the settlement of Web3 transactions and tokenized assets. Hong Kong is now gearing up for phase two of the pilot, with plans to explore new use cases for an e-HKD and engage in more focused pilot initiatives. The goal is to understand how the e-HKD can facilitate innovative methods of transacting goods and services while maintaining financial stability.The HKMA’s stance on a retail CBDC places it at the center of a global debate. While the U.S. remains undecided on the issue, with the topic becoming contentious in presidential elections, India has forged ahead with plans for a retail CBDC. Meanwhile, Thailand’s central bank commenced a pilot project for a retail CBDC earlier this year.