Top

Hong Kong Says No to Light Touch Regulation

Policy & Regulation·May 10, 2023, 11:25 PM

The CEO of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has said that while the autonomous territory will allow innovation to develop in the crypto space, that will not mean light touch regulation.

Photo by Ruslan Bardash on Unsplash

 

Lowering guard rails

After a three year hiatus, the Bloomberg Wealth Asia Summit returned to Hong Kong on Tuesday. Speaking at the conference, Eddie Yue, the CEO of the HKMA, Hong Kong’s regulatory body, outlined that the territory intends to enable innovation relative to crypto businesses that establish themselves in Hong Kong.

“We will let the industry develop and innovate, we will let them create an ecosystem here,” he said. However, he added the following caveat: “But that doesn’t mean light touch regulation. If any participant thinks that the regulation is too tight, they’re welcome to go elsewhere.”

Yue outlined that over the course of the past three years, guardrails relative to the operation of crypto-related activities were excessively high. Yue alluded to a new approach that sees those guard rails dropped to a level whereby innovation will be enabled in the digital assets space. However, he followed up by underlining the fact that the Authority has no intention of following a light touch regulatory approach.

 

No safeguards not an option

Although acknowledging that Hong Kong may have been excessively crypto unfriendly relative to digital asset regulation in the recent past, he believes that Hong Kong has now got it right. “Our guardrails are lower, to a reasonable and sustainable level,” Yue said.

The HKMA regulator flagged jurisdictions that provide little or no guardrails at all as the ones that will run into difficulties. “If you look elsewhere, there are no guardrails in some places, the guardrails are very low and there you see problems”, Yue clarified.

He cited FTX as a stand out example of a basic lack of internal controls. FTX International was based in the Bahamas. While customers of FTX International find themselves in a difficult position, those of subsidiary companies FTX Japan and FTX Europe are having their funds returned as a direct consequence of much better regulatory safeguards in those regions.

“All those wrongdoings by the platforms that we saw in the last one or two years will not happen in Hong Kong,” Yue claimed.

 

A continuing trend

While many commentators and critics from the conventional world have described bitcoin and crypto as a ponzi or a passing fad, Yue pointed out that digital assets are not going anywhere and that the trend towards digital assets will continue. Expanding further, he articulated that the overarching digital assets sector encompasses much more than just crypto: “Virtual assets or crypto is actually a very broad term. It’s not really about crypto, you’re talking about stablecoins or tokenized assets in the future.”

A mere $0.3 trillion of illiquid real world assets have been tokenized thus far. It’s anticipated that this level of tokenization will climb to $16 trillion by 2030.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Mar 28, 2025

Central Asian republics work towards crypto bank & crypto hub development

News emanating from the Central Asian republics of Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan in recent days points to further rollout and development of cryptocurrency sector infrastructure. A press release published on March 26 outlined that Kyrgyzstan is working on various initiatives in order to copper-fasten its position as a regional crypto hub. Those efforts include the advancement of digital asset regulation, enabling the launch of licensed crypto platforms and ongoing trials of legal frameworks relative to crypto. Photo by Steve Johnson on UnsplashA7A5 stablecoinOne initiative that may aid in the development of the digital assets sector in Kyrgyzstan is the rollout of the A7A5 stablecoin. A7A5 is pegged to the Russian ruble, with the token having been issued by Kyrgyz company Old Vector. The product was first launched in February, with the intention for it to be used on the A7 cross-border payment platform of Russian state-owned bank Promsvyazbank. Garantex, a Russian crypto exchange which had been sanctioned by U.S. and European authorities and was recently shut down, announced on Feb. 19 the listing of the A7A5 stablecoin. The stablecoin’s backers claim that it was issued “in complete accordance with the new national legislation - under the control of regulatory authorities and directed to an officially registered, regulated broker.” The stablecoin is being promoted on the basis of an annual yield of up to 20%, which has been established due to its link to the refinancing rate of the central bank of the Russian Federation. Kazakhstan crypto bank proposalMeanwhile, lawmakers in Central Asian neighbor Kazakhstan have proposed the creation of a national crypto bank. According to The Times of Central Asia, an English-language daily newspaper, Azat Peruashev, leader of the Ak Zhol political party within Kazakhstan’s lower house of parliament, put forward the proposal, which would implicate the involvement of the National Bank of Kazakhstan and a number of the country’s commercial banks. Peruashev addressed the proposal to Kazakhstani Prime Minister Olzhas Bektenov. However, the Central Asian country may have some fundamental issues to address before a crypto bank can become a reality. Currently, Kazakhstan has yet to establish a legal framework for the use of digital assets.  Last year, the authorities shut down 36 cryptocurrency exchanges which were deemed to have been operating illegally. In total, 3,500 illegal crypto exchanges have been shut down in Kazakhstan. Leading American crypto exchange business Coinbase faced a setback in the Central Asian country in November 2023 when the government cut access to its website within the country. While these crypto businesses have struggled to operate in Kazakhstan, Binance Kazakhstan successfully obtained a trading license from the Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) in September of last year. Earlier this month, the company added options trading and futures copy trading to the platform. Blockchain industry pioneer Kyle Chasse took to X to report on this most recent development. He suggested that given that 90% of crypto activity in Kazakhstan is off the books, the authorities are interested in launching a crypto bank so as to bring it all under their control. 

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Oct 19, 2023

OSL Parent Company Denies Sale Plans

OSL Parent Company Denies Sale PlansBC Technology Group, a Hong Kong-based investment holding company, has firmly denied recent reports suggesting it is exploring the sale of its licensed digital asset business, OSL, for up to HK$1 billion (US$137.3 million).Photo by Nextvoyage on PexelsCompany stock plummetsThis comes in response to a report that emerged via Bloomberg on Monday. The news of the possible sale had a significant impact on the company’s stock, which plummeted by over 22% to HK$3.35 the following day.BC Technology Group, which has been listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange since 2012, is the parent company of OSL. The reports hinted at the possibility of selling off parts of the business, citing undisclosed sources.In response to these rumors, BC Technology Group issued a formal statement to clarify the situation, deeming the article “factually inaccurate and highly misleading.” It vehemently refuted any intention to sell OSL, a key player in the cryptocurrency exchange sector.First licensed exchangeOSL was the first cryptocurrency exchange to be licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in Hong Kong in 2020, initially operated under a voluntary scheme and was limited to serving professional investors. However, the recent licensing requirement broadened its scope, allowing it to cater to retail investors as well, including popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.Both OSL and HashKey had their licenses upgraded this year, enabling them to serve retail investors as per the new policy. However, the reception to this new regulatory framework has been somewhat lukewarm, with only five local exchanges applying for the new virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license. The SFC had to publish a list of applicants following a financial scandal involving the JPEX crypto exchange, which led to over 2,500 complaints and losses totaling approximately HK$1.5 billion.The backdrop of this unfolding situation is Hong Kong’s efforts to establish itself as a significant virtual asset hub. The city announced its ambition to transform into a hub for digital assets a year ago, drawing considerable attention from cryptocurrency exchanges. These efforts included implementing new regulations in June that mandated licensing for cryptocurrency exchanges.Several companies with connections to Hong Kong and mainland China have expressed their intent to obtain a license, potentially taking advantage of Hong Kong’s favorable stance toward virtual assets when compared to mainland China’s strict regulations.High compliance costsNonetheless, high compliance costs in Hong Kong continue to pose a barrier, potentially preventing the city from becoming the primary base of operations for crypto businesses. Industry insiders estimate that the cost of compliance from start to finish can be as high as HK$60 million for a company. Firms have reported that obtaining a trading license in Hong Kong can involve an outlay of between HK$20 million and HK$200 million.As per BC Technology Group’s mid-year report, the company reported a net loss of HK$94.7 million in the first half of 2023. This marked a notable improvement compared to the HK$312.1 million in losses during the same period the previous year. OSL remains a significant source of income for the company.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Nov 02, 2023

South Korean FIU rejects Hanbitco’s bid to become fiat-to-crypto exchange

South Korean FIU rejects Hanbitco’s bid to become fiat-to-crypto exchangeWhile numerous cryptocurrency-only exchanges in Korea have been vying for registration as fiat-to-crypto exchanges with the financial regulator, the government has turned down another platform’s attempt to achieve this status.Photo by Dim Hou on UnsplashUnmet standardsAccording to a report from local news provider MoneyToday, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC) recently convened a committee that decided against approving Hanbitco’s request to change its business status. Industry sources suggest that this decision was based on Hanbitco’s inability to meet the standards set by the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, often referred to as the Financial Transaction Reporting Act.Fine and cautionary orderA person familiar with the matter that the committee started deliberating on Hanbitco’s request to alter its business status about two weeks ago and ultimately decided against it. A significant factor in this decision might have been the KRW 2 billion ($1.49 million) fine levied on Hanbitco, stemming from numerous violations found in recent on-site inspections, the source added.Before approaching the FIU with its request, Hanbitco formed a partnership with Kwangju Bank in June to obtain real-name accounts, facilitating Korean won deposits and withdrawals. Achieving this is quite uncommon for a crypto-only exchange. In Korea, exchanges are legally required to have real-name bank accounts for trading in Korean won. Presently, only five platforms hold registration as fiat-to-crypto exchanges: Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit and Gopax, each having its own banking partnership.As per the details released by the FIU, besides the levied fine, Hanbitco was issued a cautionary order, and five of its employees faced reprimands.The fine of KRW 2 billion is the heaviest handed out to a virtual asset service provider from on-site inspections held between last year and the first half of this year. For perspective, Upbit, the country’s largest crypto exchange, was fined KRW 80 million.An FIU representative noted that during the evaluation of Hanbitco’s application to transition into a fiat-to-crypto exchange, factors such as the firm’s anti-money laundering (AML) protocols, its internal control systems and past sanctions played a role in the decision-making process.

news
Loading