BitOasis Obtains First Early-Stage Broker Dealer License in Dubai

Haechi Labs Joins Hands with Oasys for Entry into Japanese MarketHaechi Labs, a South Korean blockchain service and digital wallet provider, announced Thursday that it has signed a business deal with Japanese blockchain gaming platform Oasys to establish a footing in the Japanese market.Photo by Erika Fletcher on UnsplashFostering collaborationThrough the new partnership, the companies plan to share their technical expertise and promote mutual growth. In particular, Haechi Labs’ digital wallet, Face Wallet, will be onboarded on the Oasys mainnet. This integration will allow Oasys users to easily access Web3 services using their existing social media accounts. Face Wallet supports login through various social media platforms such as Google, Discord, Twitter, Facebook, Apple, and Kakao, thereby reducing entry barriers for users who are new to Web3.Haechi Labs will also provide a software development kit (SDK) for Face Wallet, enabling game developers operating their games on the Oasys platform to integrate the wallet into their services.“We expect that Face Wallet’s integration into the Oasys mainnet will streamline the onboarding process for Web3 games,” said Moon Geon-gi, CEO of Haechi Labs. “We will continue to pursue close cooperation with various companies in the future.”Gaming focusOasys’ multi-layered blockchain network is centered around gaming, consisting of a built-in L2 scalability solution. It has worked with various major gaming companies such as SEGA, Ubisoft, Bandai Namco, Nexon, and Netmarble, who participate in the network as validator nodes.

Korean National Assembly Members’ Crypto Holdings to Undergo InvestigationThe Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission of Korea (ACRC) has announced that it has convened a special investigative team to conduct an investigation into the virtual asset dealings of members of the 21st National Assembly, particularly details on acquisition, trading, and losses.Photo by Mediamodifier on UnsplashComing under scrutinyThe National Assembly passed a resolution back in May titled “The Resolution on Voluntary Reporting and Investigation of Virtual Assets of National Assembly Members,” requesting that all members of the Assembly should voluntarily report the status and changes in their holdings of virtual assets for a thorough investigation by the ACRC amid public concern about conflicts of interest and illegal transactions.As a result, individual consent forms for the collection, use, and third-party provision of personal information were submitted to the ACRC last Monday by Assembly members of the ruling and opposition parties.Other minor political parties like the Justice Party, Basic Income Party, and Transition Korea Party that had previously submitted their personal information consent forms have resubmitted their forms in accordance with the format of those submitted by the ruling and opposition parties. Independent lawmakers and some non-negotiation bodies have also voluntarily submitted forms of their own.Extensive legal probeThe scope of the investigation includes the domestic acquisition, trading, and losses of virtual assets by Assembly members starting from the beginning of their term on May 30, 2020, to May 31, 2023, when their personal information consent forms were submitted. The ACRC will compare this information with reports formerly filed by the members themselves.The ACRC appointed Vice Chairman and Secretary General Jung Seung-yoon as the head of the team and assigned some 30 investigators to carry out a census for 90 days starting on September 18. It will be executed under the Act On The Prevention Of Corruption And The Establishment And Management Of The Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission and the Personal Information Protection Act.“As this is an important matter of public interest, we will conduct the investigation promptly and fairly in accordance with the law and guidelines,” said Jung. “We will also strictly protect the data acquired during the investigation process, including the personal information consent forms.”

Korean Lawmakers Complete First Rough Draft of Virtual Asset User Protection BillKorean lawmakers have completed the first rough draft of the virtual asset user protection bill at a National Policy Committee meeting held later last month.©Pexels/Matthias ZomerAgreeing on term usage ‘virtual assets’So far, 18 bills have been proposed to regulate cryptocurrencies, and the lawmakers and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) agreed to use the term “virtual assets” to encompass similar terms such as digital assets and crypto assets.Phased enactment of billsThe bills are likely to be reviewed under the title “Virtual Asset User Protection Act.” The bipartisan group agreed to enact the bills in phases, introducing the user protection bill in the first phase and the virtual asset listing and issuance bill in the second phase.Meanwhile, there were mixed opinions on the content of the bills. In particular, there was debate over whether the bills should stipulate that the central bank digital currency (CBDC) is excluded from virtual assets, and whether the bills should include a standard for determining if a virtual asset is a security.Debate over stipulating CBDC’s statusThe stipulation of excluding CBDC from virtual assets was the most divisive topic since it would lead to defining the conditions for other assets such as non-fungible tokens. Moreover, the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, which currently regulates virtual asset service providers (VASPs), does not contain any stipulation on CBDC. Some raised concerns that such discrepancies could later cause confusion. In the end, assembly members decided to discuss the matter again in April after consulting with the Bank of Korea and the Ministry of Government Legislation.Criteria for classifying virtual assets as securitiesRegarding whether to include criteria for classifying virtual assets as securities, the lawmakers and financial regulators took different sides.Lee Yong-woo, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, underlined that a clear statement of the relationship between the issuer and the recipient of virtual assets in a whitepaper can determine their security status. He added that such provisions should be included in the bills.Park Min-woo, an FSC official, on the other hand, commented on a cautious note that in case virtual assets fall under the category of securities, they may not be applicable to the virtual asset act. He explained that VASPs might deal with both securities and virtual assets, and in such cases, there could be a misunderstanding that VASPs are not subject to the virtual asset act simply because they trade securities.