Lemon Healthcare launches blockchain-based electronic prescription service

Korea to Tighten Scrutiny of Crypto Exchange Shareholders Amid Rising ConcernsSouth Korea’s financial regulator is stepping up efforts to evaluate the qualifications of majority shareholders of cryptocurrency exchanges, according to a report by local news outlet Newsis. This initiative follows instances where majority shareholders of local exchanges, including Bithumb, found themselves embroiled in criminal proceedings. Drawing parallels with the banking sector, the regulator is scrutinizing the credentials of majority shareholders to ensure compliance and integrity within the cryptocurrency exchange landscape.Photo by Terrence Low on UnsplashRevamping reporting requirementsThe Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Financial Services Commission recently set up a task force to revamp the reporting requirements for crypto exchanges.The upcoming requirements are anticipated to be integrated into the reporting forms that cryptocurrency exchanges must complete, starting in October of next year. Essentially, these stipulations will determine whether existing exchanges, such as Upbit, Bithumb, and Coinone, can sustain their operations in the future.Periodic evaluationAccording to the Enforcement Decree of the Financial Transaction Reports Act, all virtual asset service providers (VASPs), including exchanges, are mandated to submit a renewal report every three years. Upbit, having been the first to submit its initial report in October 2021, will join other crypto exchanges in updating their reports in October 2024.A majority shareholder qualification assessment is a process in which the government periodically checks whether majority shareholders have the necessary qualifications to operate a financial company. Through this process, the FIU aims to curb potential illicit activities by majority shareholders, who hold significant sway over cryptocurrency exchange operations, thereby mitigating any potential harm to the users.Regulatory grey areaThis measure emerged from concerns that majority shareholders of exchanges have existed in a regulatory grey area. In fact, under the Financial Transaction Reports Act, only exchange representatives and registered officers are required to report and undergo examination when declaring VASPs. This leaves the actual owners and controllers — the majority shareholders — unidentified and unexamined.The current circumstances involving VASPs are markedly different and more concerning compared to other financial sectors. In the banking sector, restrictions are placed on share ownership and voting rights if majority shareholders have breached financial laws or if they are capital entities forbidden from owning a bank. Similarly, online peer-to-peer lenders and large lenders are also under obligation to have their majority shareholders scrutinized, as they fall under analogous regulations.Fraud and manipulation allegationsThe heightened scrutiny is also thought to have been sparked by recent allegations of fraud and market manipulation involving some majority shareholders of Korean exchanges. For instance, Mr. Kang Jong-hyun, a majority shareholder of Bithumb, is currently facing a criminal trial for allegations of fraudulent and unfair trade activities under the Capital Markets Act. Additionally, Song Chi-hyung, the majority shareholder of Upbit and chairman of Dunamu, is facing a Supreme Court trial over alleged price manipulation through wash trading.Moves to amend legislationMeanwhile, efforts are underway in the National Assembly to amend the existing legislation. Yun Chang-hyun, a lawmaker from the ruling People Power Party and a member of the National Policy Committee, has recently proposed a bill to revise the Financial Transaction Reports Act. The amendment seeks to implement a majority shareholder screening system for VASPs.The proposed amendments would obligate VASPs, including crypto exchanges, to disclose information about their majority shareholders in their reports, thereby enabling the FIU to scrutinize any past financial crimes or economic offenses committed by these majority shareholders.

At the end of last month, social derivatives trading platform ZKX, a protocol that runs on the Ethereum-centric Starknet layer-2 network, shut down blindsiding the project’s stakeholders. That event has led to Singapore-headquartered digital assets firm Amber Group speaking out, calling for cryptocurrency projects to be more accountable and transparent going forward. Not economically viableNews of the project shutdown emerged when ZKX founder Eduard Jubany Tur took to X on July 30 to outline the discontinuation of the protocol. Tur claimed that the project was “unable to find an economically viable path for the protocol.” In a long-form post, the ZKX founder outlined that user engagement had been minimal, resulting in disappointing trading volumes. By extension, Tur claimed that revenues didn’t come anywhere close to covering cloud server expenses. “The market is undervaluing the work done and infrastructure built by appchains and dApps coming from ecosystems like ours,” Tur added. Pseudonymous blockchain sleuth ZachXBT had a different take on the matter, claiming that the shutdown represented a rug pull. Amber Group chimed in on the subject on X on Aug. 3. Amber suggested that it wouldn’t break any contractual non-disclosure obligations it had with regard to ZKX but that aside, the firm took the opportunity to share its perspective more broadly in an effort to promote transparency.Photo by Markus Spiske on PexelsAmber Group criticismAmber Group criticized the ZKX team on the basis of a lack of transparency. It stated: “The last update we received was on July 30, when the project announced the cessation of operations. This decision was made without prior communication, highlighting the importance of transparency in our industry.” Staying with that theme, it claimed that clear communication and transparency are essential for fostering trust and collaboration within the crypto community, and that such principles would guide future projects. Amber Group had acted as a market maker relative to the ZKX project. It borrowed and purchased ZKX tokens in support of the launch of the token and in an effort to support token liquidity post-launch. It had secured two million ZKX tokens from the open market, with its overall holding totaling three million ZKX tokens. Project investor HashKey Capital also took to the X social media platform on the subject. Like Amber Group it too criticized the ZKX project for its lack of accountability and transparency. It described the project’s reluctance to communicate as “disappointing,” while it asserted that Tur’s handling of the situation had been “regrettable.” Ye Su, founding partner at ArkStream Capital, expressed a similar complaint, stating on X that “when ZKX shut down, as investors, we got zero heads-up.” He also singled out Tur, claiming that “Edward took the money from early supporters without any communication, showing no moral standards and losing his right to future entrepreneurship in the industry.”

In a move announced on Friday, OKX, the Seychelles-headquartered cryptocurrency exchange, declared its decision to delist 20 trading pairs by Jan. 5, triggering a notable price fall for major privacy coins such as Monero, Dash and ZCash. The exchange cited that the affected pairs did not align with its listing criteria, though specific details were not disclosed.Photo by Khara Woods on UnsplashPrivacy coin delisting trendWhile OKX did not explicitly articulate the rationale behind this move, industry observers are speculating that it could be part of the exchange’s broader efforts to comply with evolving regulatory measures. Privacy coins have increasingly drawn regulatory scrutiny due to concerns about potential illicit activities within the crypto space. Earlier in the year, Binance had also announced the delisting of several privacy coins to ensure compliance with local laws and regulations. The broader context of regulatory pressures on privacy-focused cryptocurrencies seems to be impacting major exchanges’ decisions. In 2022, Huobi cited regulatory pressures when it took the decision to delist Monero and other privacy coins. Kraken was further ahead of the curve still, delisting Monero for UK customers in November 2021. Downward price actionFollowing OKX’s announcement on Friday, the prices of privacy-focused cryptocurrencies, notably Zcash (ZEC) and Monero (XMR), experienced a decline. The entire sector of “privacy cryptos” has witnessed a 7.1% decrease in overall market capitalization, according to an index of such coins compiled by Malaysian crypto indexing firm CoinGecko. During this period, Monero and Zcash have seen unit price declines of 4.5% and 10.7%, respectively. Other tokens set for delisting, including Dash, Powerpool and Horizen, have recorded declines of up to 14%. OKX has provided guidance to users, advising them to cancel orders related to the affected trading pairs before the delisting date to avoid automatic cancellation, a process that may take 1–3 working days. Concurrently, the exchange has halted deposits for the impacted cryptocurrencies and plans to cease withdrawals by Mar. 5, 2024, affording holders sufficient time to withdraw their assets. However, once the delisting is complete, trading these digital assets on OKX will become impossible. Interestingly, certain privacy coins like MINA continue to be listed on the exchange, experiencing a 7.5% increase following the delisting announcement. It’s crucial to note that OKX’s delisting is not exclusive to privacy tokens, as it also includes other trading pairs associated with digital assets such as Kusama, Flow, Kyber Network and Aragon. The fight for privacySome crypto community members have voiced their concerns on social media, with many fearing that the innovation may be ‘captured’ by the various state authorities over time. However, ex-Monero developer Ricardo Spagni (AKA “Fluffypony”) was nonchalant about the whole thing, judging by his comments. In a post on social media platform X, he wrote: ”Monero users and contributors literally couldn’t care less about delistings at this point.” As the regulatory landscape evolves, cryptocurrency exchanges are navigating these challenges, impacting the availability and value of specific tokens on their platforms. Investors and privacy advocates alike will be closely watching how such regulatory compliance measures continue to shape the crypto market and crypto use.