ZA Bank gears up for retail crypto app offering

Zipmex Thailand halts crypto trading citing SEC complianceTroubled cryptocurrency exchange Zipmex Thailand has recently announced the temporary suspension of digital asset trading until early next year.Photo by Anh Tuan To on UnsplashTrading and deposits suspendedThe decision, outlined by the firm in a Facebook post on Saturday, is attributed to the platform’s efforts in ensuring full compliance with the standards set by Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).In the Facebook post, Zipmex Limited addressed its customers, stating:“Dear customers, Zipmex Limited would like to ensure the proper and compliant conduct of the company’s business operations in accordance with the criteria set by Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).”The suspension of digital asset trading and deposits of all types became effective from Nov. 25.Withdrawals remain openDespite the suspension, customers will retain the ability to withdraw Thai baht and digital assets from their Trade Wallet through the website and mobile application until Jan. 31, 2024. However, for digital assets categorized as “Trade Only,” customers are instructed to contact Customer Support for withdrawal. Beyond Jan. 31, 2024, when the withdrawal feature through the website and mobile application is suspended, customers will need to seek assistance from Customer Support.Zipmex Thailand also emphasized that the withdrawal process for digital assets may take between seven to 14 days, requiring customers to provide supporting documents for identity and account ownership verification.As a cryptocurrency exchange headquartered in Singapore and operating in multiple countries, including Thailand, Australia and Indonesia, Zipmex has already fallen foul of Thailand’s SEC. Earlier this year, it was hit with penalties related to allegations of improper use of a digital asset custodian service and the redirection of customers to the Singapore-based exchange, Zipmex Pte, creating a conflict of interest.Financial difficultiesThe exchange has faced financial challenges, including difficulties in repaying creditors after losses incurred from exposure to crypto lenders Babel Finance and Genesis in 2022. A planned $100 million buyout earlier in the year fell through when the buyer, reportedly V Ventures, withdrew from the purchase.Zipmex’s troubles date back to last summer when the exchange halted withdrawals due to volatile market conditions and a liquidity crunch resulting from exposure to the troubled crypto lender Babel Finance. Despite facing financial difficulties, the exchange expressed its commitment to maintaining the integrity of its platform.In August of the same year, Bloomberg reported that Zipmex intended to meet with potential investors and Thailand’s financial regulator to discuss a recovery plan. By November, the platform was in advanced discussions with venture capital fund V Ventures for the sale of a majority stake.Earlier this year, the Thai Securities and Exchange Commission announced an investigation into whether Zipmex breached local rules in its offering of certain digital-asset products. In April, the company filed a request to extend the moratorium period to enable the firm to work towards restructuring. Later that month, it appeared that the V Ventures investment deal had fallen through. By July, the beleaguered firm had sued the investor for breach of contract.The ongoing challenges faced by Zipmex underscore the complex landscape and regulatory scrutiny surrounding cryptocurrency exchanges in various jurisdictions.

Hong Kong court grants trademark injunction against HuobiThe Hong Kong Special Administrative Region High Court has resolved a trademark dispute between X-Spot Global Limited and Huobi Global Limited, ruling in favor of X-Spot.Back in June, X-Spot alleged that Huobi Global infringed on its trademark rights related to the “Huobi” name. In the legal process which followed, the court sided with X-Spot, compelling Huobi Global to cease using the “Huobi” trademark or any similar name or logo in Hong Kong.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashPotential confusionThe court’s official judgment highlighted concerns about potential confusion among the public and industry professionals arising from Huobi Global’s use of the “Huobi” trademarks. It emphasized that such confusion could lead people to believe that X-Spot Global, as the registered trademark owner, is actively engaged in cryptocurrency business associated with the trademark. In response, the court dismissed Huobi Global’s plea to revoke the service order and halt negotiations, also instructing the covering of X-Spot Global’s legal expenses.Post-acquisition conflictThe background to this dispute originates in the acquisition of Huobi Global last year. It’s widely believed that TRON blockchain network founder Justin Sun purchased the exchange for $1 billion although Sun has subsequently suggested that he is just an advisor to the crypto exchange business. The acquisition was made by About Capital Management, an entity associated with the controversial crypto entrepreneur.In May of this year, Sun claimed that Wei Li, a brother of Huobi founder Leon Li, had unjustly profited from the sale of Huobi’s native HT token. The disagreement escalated and as a consequence of that conflict, it became apparent that the acquisition agreement explicitly prohibited the buyer from using the “Huobi’’ trademark.Leon Li accused the cryptocurrency exchange of violating the acquisition agreement’s rules by unauthorized use of the “Huobi” trademark. This legal battle has shed light on the strained relationship between Leon Li and Justin Sun.The court’s decision adds a layer of complexity to Huobi Global’s legal challenges, intensifying existing regulatory issues. Notably, the cryptocurrency exchange is already grappling with a recent order from Malaysian authorities to cease operations in the country due to alleged illegal activities.The ruling comes at a critical juncture for Huobi Global. In September the business rebranded to HTX, signaling aspirations for global expansion amidst a shifting legal landscape. At the time, Justin Sun provided the rationale behind the rebrand. Taking to the X social media platform, he wrote:“It’s very hard for foreigners, Westerners, to pronounce ‘Huobi’… It doesn’t make any sense to them.” Sun went on to explain that the word Huobi means fire and coin in Chinese, adding, “That’s why we rebranded as HTX for international branding.”In light of this trademark infringement injunction decision, it could equally be speculated that the company was acting in advance of an unfavorable ruling in compliance with the terms of the business acquisition agreement.In reaching a decision on the matter, Judge Mimmie Chan J noted the lack of a defense mounted by Huobi against the trademark infringement action.

Zettai Pte Ltd., the Singapore-based holding company that controls Indian crypto exchange WazirX through its subsidiary Zanmai India, has filed an application for a moratorium with the Singaporean High Court, under section 64 of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018. Six months requestedIn the filing (HC/OA 861/2024), the company has pleaded with the court to be granted a six-month moratorium, which would give the firm the space and time needed to restructure its liabilities. The company laid out details of its moratorium application in a blog post published to its website on August 28. The firm outlined that a moratorium represents “ the most efficient way to address users’ cryptocurrency balances on the Platform and facilitate recovery for users.” An automatic moratorium of 30 days has effectively been granted as a consequence of the application itself, and it is up to the court if it approves the six-month moratorium that is being sought. A date for the hearing of that matter has yet to be scheduled.Photo by Palu Malerba on Pexels$234 million hack falloutWazirX has been dealing with the fallout from a $234 million hack which occurred in July. One key entity that is owed funds is Indian crypto app CoinSwitch. In an effort to get its funds back, the company has sued WazirX. Taking to the X social media platform, CoinSwitch outlined why it felt the need to take legal action. It stated: "From the day of the incident, we have tried to be in constant touch with the WazirX team, seeking recovery of the funds that are stuck on their exchange. However, our efforts have not come to fruition." In a follow-up tweet, CoinSwitch assured its own users that its exposure to WazirX has no impact on user balances. The company has WazirX exposure that amounts to 2% of its overall user funds. That exposure is reduced further if WazirX’ claim that only ERC-20 tokens were affected is taken on board, accounting for 1% of CoinSwitch user deposits. White KnightWazirX co-founder Nischal Shetty spoke to the notion of a “white knight” in an affidavit submitted under the Zettai name to support the application. He outlined that WazirX is in talks with 11 crypto exchanges and has signed three non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). The company has also received offers for financing and for partnering with Zettai, the WazirX parent company. WazirX has outlined that it has set aside $12 million in digital assets to cover legal and associated costs that the company anticipates incurring as part of its restructuring efforts. Matters are further compounded by the fact that a cloud hangs over the ownership of the company. Shetty has claimed that he is no longer an owner of the exchange. In 2022, he wrote that Binance had acquired WazirX. Around the same time frame, Binance’s Changpeng Zhao (CZ) outlined that Binance didn’t control WazirX systems.  India’s economic intelligence agency, the Enforcement Directorate, has claimed in the past that Shetty has gone out of his way to obscure the ownership structure by way of a complex chain of companies in Singapore.